Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States

Cancer Causes and Control

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 701-712

  Cronin, Kathleen A ^a   Yu, Binbing ^b   Krapcho, Martin ^b   Miglioretti, Diana L ^c   Fay, Michael P ^a   Izmirlian, Grant ^a   Ballard Barbash, Rachel ^a   Geller, Berta M ^d   Feuer, Eric J ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer screening; Dissemination; Mammography; Population based sample

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST; SELF REPORT;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REGISTRIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; SEER PROGRAM; SURVIVAL RATE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 23444445202     PISSN: 09575243     EISSN: 15737225     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-005-0693-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. RA Smith D Saslow KA Sawyer 2003 American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: update 2003 CA Cancer J Clin 53 141 169
2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. 2002 Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and rationale Ann Intern Med 137 344 346
3. SA Newell A Girgis RW Sanson-Fisher NJ Savolainen 1999 The accuracy of self-reported health behaviors and risk factors relating to cancer and cardiovascular disease in the general population A critical review. Am J Prev Med 17 211 229
4. R Ballard-Barbash SH Taplin BC Yankaskas 1997 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database AJR Am J Roentgenol 169 1001 1008
5. EM Rogers 1995 Diffusion of Innovations 4 Free Press New York
6. Research Triangle Institute 2002 SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 8.0 Research Research Triangle Institute Triangle Park, NC
7. V Mahajan RA Peterson 1985 Models for Innovation Diffusion. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Sage CA
8. SH Taplin L Ichikawa DS Buist D Seger E White 2004 Evaluating organized breast cancer screening implementation: the prevention of late-stage disease? Cancer Epidemiol Biomar Prev 13 225 234
9. Cronin KA, Izmirlian G (2003) Calculation of hazard rates for external-internal influence diffusion of innovation models. National Cancer Institute, Statistical Research and Applications Branch Technical report. (Accessed on 1/6/2005 on http://srab.cancer.gov/reports/)
10. M Aitkin D Anderson B Francis J Hinde 1990 Statistical Modelling in GLIM Oxford University Press New York
11. TM Therneau PM Grambsch 2000 Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model Springer-Verlag New York
12. JP Klein ML Moeschberger 1997 Survival Analysis Springer-Verlag New York
13. SAS macro for the semi-parametric Gamma frailty model, Medical College of Wisconsin (accessed on 1/6/2005 on http://www.biostat.mcw.edu/SoftMenu.html)
14. Yu B (2005) Estimation of shared gamma frailty models by a modified EM algorithm.Comput Stat Data Anal (In press). Available online 12 October 2004.
15. N Breen DK Wagener ML Brown WW Davis R Ballard-Barbash 2001 Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from 1987, 1992, and 1998 national health interview surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst 93 1704 1713
16. LS Caplan MT Mandelson LA Anderson 2003 Validity of self-reported mammography: examining recall and covariates among older women in a health maintenance organization. Am J Epidemiol 157 267 272