The impacts of ignoring a crossed factor in analyzing cross-classified data

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 182-212

  Luo, Wen ^a   Kwok, Oi Man ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449580871     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273170902794214     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berkhof, J., & Kampen, J. K. (2004). Asymptotic effect of misspecification in the random part of the multilevel model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 201-218.
2. Browne, W. J., Goldstein, H., & Rasbash, J. (2001). Multiple membership multiple classification (MMMC) models. Statistical Modeling, 1, 103-124.
3. Fielding, A. (2002). Teaching groups as foci for evaluating performance in cost-effectiveness of GCE Advanced Level provision: Some practical methodological innovations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 225-246.
4. Goldstein, H. (1986). Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalized least squares. Biometrika, 73, 43-56.
5. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold.
6. Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 329-367.
7. Hough, J. R. (2006). Business segment performance redux: A multilevel approach. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 45-61.
8. Jayasinghe, U. W., Marsh, H. W., & Bond, N. (2003). A multilevel cross-classified modeling approach to peer review of grant proposals: The effects of assessor and researcher attributes on assessor ratings. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 166, 279-300.
9. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Kwok, O., West, S. G., & Green, S. B. (2007). The impact of misspecifying the within-subject co-variance structure in multiwave longitudinal multilevel models: A Monte Carlo study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 557-592.
11. Lange, N., & Laird, N. M. (1989). The effect of covariance structure on variance estimation in balanced growth curve models with random parameters. Journal of American Statistical Association, 84,241-247.
12. Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Cheng, J. H. S. (2008). A multilevel perspective on gender in classroom motivation and climate: Potential benefits of male teachers for boys? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 78-95.
13. Meyers, J., & Beretvas, S. N. (2006). The impact of inappropriate modeling of cross-classified data structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 473-497.
14. Moerbeek, M. (2004). The consequence of ignoring a level of nesting in multilevel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 129-149.
15. Rasbash, J., & Goldstein, H. (1994). Efficient analysis of mixed hierarchical and crossed random structures using a multilevel model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19, 337-350.
16. Raudenbush, S. W. (1993). A crossed random effects model for unbalanced data with applications in cross-sectional and longitudinal research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 321-350.
17. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchicallinear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
18. SAS Institute Inc. (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1 User's guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
19. Tranmer, M. (2001). Ignoring a level in a multilevel model: Evidence from UK census data. Environment and Planning, 33, 941-948.
20. Van den Noortgate, W., Opdenakker, M. C., & Onghena, P. (2005). The effects of ignoring a level in multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16, 281-303.
21. Van Landeghem, G., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2005). The consequence of ignoring a level of nesting in multilevel analysis: A comment. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 423-434