High school students’ decision making about sustainability

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 201-215

  Siegel, Marcelle A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449573887     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504620600689003     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1989. Science for all Americans, project 2061, New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Asian Pacific Environmental Network. 2005. Personal email from Jennifer Lin, 8 June
3. Bell, P., and Linn, M. C., Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning on the web. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. March, Chicago, IL.
4. Bowers, C. A., 2001. Educating for eco-justice and community, London: University of Georgia Press.
5. CTB. 1997. TerraNova, Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
6. DiRanna, K., and Siegel, M. A., 2004. Facilitating learning: the role of the teacher: Elementary Science Teacher Leadership (ESTL) 2, Berkeley, CA: University of California. Also available online at: http://sepuplhs.org (accessed 20 November 2004).
7. Education Development Center. 1997. There is no away, insights series, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
8. The First National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit. 1991. Principles of environmental justice, Washington, DC: The First National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit.
9. Furman, G. C., and Gruenewald, D. A., 2004. Expanding the landscape of social justice: a critical ecological analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1): 47–76.
10. Hart, P., and Nolan, K., 1999. A critical analysis of research in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 34: 1–69.
11. Jickling, B., 2001. Environmental thought, the language of sustainability, and digital watches. Environmental Education Research, 7(2): 167–180.
12. Kortland, K., and Lijnse, P., 1996. “ Decision making on the waste issue: the classroom trial of a problem-posing teaching/learning process ”. In International Organization for Science and Technology Education 8th Symposium proceedings, Edited by: Calhoun, K., Panwar, R., and Shrum, S., Vol. 1, 113–117. Edmonton: Continuing Professional Education.
13. Matsuoka, M., 2003. Building healthy communities from the ground up: environmental justice in California, Oakland, CA: Asian Pacific Environmental Network, Communities for a Better Environment, Environmental Health Coalition, People Organizing to Demand Environmental and Economic Rights, Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition/Health and Environmental Justice Project.
14. National Research Council. 1996. National science education standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15. Novotny, P., 2000. Where we live, work and play: the environmental justice movement and the struggle for a new environmentalism, Westport, CT: Praeger.
16. Ranney, M., and Schank, P., 1998. “ Toward an integration of the social and the scientific: observing, modeling and promoting the explanatory coherence of reasoning ”. In Connectionist and PDP models of social reasoning, Edited by: Read, S., and Miller, L., 245–274. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Ranney, M., Schank, P., Hoadley, C., and Neff, J., 1994. “ ‘I know one when I see one:’ how (much) do hypotheses differ from evidence? ”. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual American Society for Information Science Workshop on Classification Research 139–156.
18. Ratcliffe, M., 1996. Pupil decision-making about socioscientific issues, within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19: 167–182.
19. Read, S. J., and Marcus-Newhall, A., 1993. Explanatory coherence in social explanations: a parallel distributed processing account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 429–447.
20. Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., and Leone, T. J., 2001. “ BGuILE: strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms ”. In Cognition and instruction: twenty five years of progress, Edited by: Carver, S. M., and Klahr, D., 263–305. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Rickinson, M., 2001. Learners and learning in environmental education: a review of recent research evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3): 207–317.
22. Romm, J., 2002. “ The coincidental order of environmental justice ”. In Justice and natural resources: concepts, strategies, and applications, Edited by: Mutz, K. M., Bryner, G. C., and Kenney, D. S., 117–137. Washington, DC: Island Press.
23. Schank, P. K., 1995. Computational tools for modeling and aiding reasoning: assessing and applying the theory of explanatory coherence Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
24. Schank, P., and Ranney, M., 1991. “ An empirical investigation of the psychological fidelity of ECHO: modeling an experimental study of explanatory coherence ”. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 892–897. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Schank, P., and Ranney, M., 1992. “ Assessing explanatory coherence: a new method for integrating verbal data of on-line belief revisions ”. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 599–604. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Schank, P., Ranney, M., and Hoadley, C., 1996. “ Convince me [revised computer program (on CD, etc.) and manual] ”. In The 1996–1997 BioQUEST library, (4th edn), Edited by: Jungck, J. R., Vaughan, V., Calley, J. N., Peterson, N. S., Soderberg, P., and Stewart, J., College Park, MD: Academic Software Development Group, University of Maryland.
27. Science Education for Public Understanding Program. 1995. Issues, evidence and you, Ronkonkoma, NY: Lab-Aids.
28. Science Education for Public Understanding Program. 1999. Science and sustainability, Ronkonkoma, NY: Lab-Aids.
29. Siegel, M. A., 1999. Teaching science for public understanding: developing decision-making abilities, University of California at Berkeley. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
30. Siegel, M. A., and Ranney, M. A., 2003. Developing the Changes in Attitude about the Relevance of Science (CARS) questionnaire and assessing two high school science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8): 757–775.
31. Siegel, M. A., Hynds, P., Siciliano, M., and Nagle, B., 2006. “ Using rubrics to foster meaningful learning ”. In Assessment in Science: practical experiences and education research, 89–106. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
32. Smith, B. K., and Reiser, B. J., National Geographic unplugged: classroom-centered design of interactive nature films. Conference proceedings on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’98). pp. 424–431.
33. Stiggins, R. J., 2001. Student involved classroom assessment, (3rd edn), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34. Swartz, R. J., and Parks, S., 1994. Infusing critical and creative thinking into content instruction: a lesson design handbook for the elementary grades, Pacific Grove, CA: Critical Thinking Press and Software.
35. Taylor, D. E., 2000. The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4): 508–580.
36. Thagard, P., 1989. Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12: 435–502.
37. Wilson, M., Sloane, K., and Roberts, L., 1995. SEPUP course I, issues, evidence and you: achievement evidence from the pilot implementation, Berkeley, CA: University of California. Bear Report Series, SA-95-2
38. Wimberly, R. C., 1993. Policy perspectives on social, agricultural and rural sustainability. Rural Sociology, 58: 1–29.