Separating the 'rights of' and 'justice for' bombers

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 59-61

  Brassington, Iain ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRIMINAL LAW; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INJURY; MILITARY MEDICINE; MORALITY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; POLITICS; PRISONER; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TERRORISM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CRIMINAL LAW; HEALTH RESOURCES; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; MILITARY MEDICINE; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; POLITICS; PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS; PRISONERS; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TERRORISM; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 70449559101     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160902995109     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Beauchamp, T., and J. Childress. 2009. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 6th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Gesundheit, B., N. Ash, S. Blazer, and A. I. Rivkind. 2009. Medical care for terrorists-to treat or not to treat? American Journal of Bioethics 9(10): 40-42.
3. Mapel, D. 2001. Revising the doctrine of double effect. Journal of Applied Philosophy 18(3): 257-272.
4. Primoratz, I. 1990. What is terrorism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 7(2): 129-138.
5. 'R.A.T.' 1971. The Bomb-Throwers. York?: Organization of Revolutionary Anarchists.