Revising the doctrine of double effect

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 257-272

  Mapel, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899345486     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5930.00193     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. J. Bennett (1981), Intended as a means, in S. McMurrin (ed.) The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. II (Salt Lake City, University of Utah Press, 1981), pp. 95-116
2. N. Ann Davis (1984) The doctrine of double effect: problems of interpretation, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 65, pp. 107-23.
3. Warren Quinn (1993), Actions, intentions, and consequences: the doctrine of double effect, Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 334-351
4. Jeff McMahan (1994), Revising the doctrine of double effect, Journal of Applied Philosophy Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 201-212.
5. Davis. Problems of interpretation, 114-5.
6. W. A. Parent (1980) Judith Thomson and the logic of rights, Philosophical Studies, vol. 37, 405-18.
7. N. Ann Davis (1988) Rights and moral theory: a critical review of Judith Thomson’s Rights, Restitution and Rism, Ethics 98, no. 4, pp. 815-19
8. Jeff McMahan (1994), Self-defence and the problem of the innocent attacker, Ethics 104, no. 2, pp. 252-90.