The ethics of psychology's role in politics and the development and institution of social policy

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 103-111

  Martel, Michelle M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethics; Politics; Public statements; Social policy; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449558793     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508420902772694     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adler, N. E., David, H. P., Major, B. N., Roth, S. H., Russo, N. F., & Wyatt, G. E. (1990). Psychological responses after abortion. Science, 248(4951), 41-44.
2. American Psychological Association. (1999, February 20). Resolution on affirmative action and equal opportunity. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 11, 2006 from http://www.apa.org/pi/oema/oemares.html
3. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060-1073.
4. American Psychological Assocation. (n.d.). Psychological issues related to child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved February 11, 2006 from http://www.apa.org/pi/cyf/res_neglect.html
5. Cicchetti, D., Toth, S. L., & Maughan, A. (2000). An ecological-transactional model of child maltreatment. In A. J. Sameroff, M. Lewis, & S. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychpathology (2nd ed., pp. 689-722). New York: Plenum.
6. Crosby, F. J., & Clayton, S. (2004). Values and science. American Psychologist, 59(2), 125-126.
7. Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., Clayton, S., & Downing, R. A. (2003). Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58(2), 93-115.
8. Fox, D. R. (1993). Psychological jurisprudence and radical social change. American Psychologist, 48(3), 234-241.
9. Kendler, H. H. (1993). Psychology and the ethics of social policy. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1046-1053.
10. Kendler, H. H. (1999). The role of value in the world of psychology. American Psychologist, 54(10), 828-835.
11. Kendler, H. H. (2000). Amoral thoughts about morality: The intersection of science, psychology, and ethics. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
12. Kendler, H. H. (2002). Psychology and ethics: Interactions and conflicts. Philosophical Psychology, 15(4), 489-508.
13. Kendler, H. H. (2004). Politics and science: A combustible mixture. American Psychologist, 59(2), 122-123.
14. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). When worlds collide: Social science, politics, and the Rind et al. (1998) child sexual abuse meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 57(3), 176-188.
15. Milgram, S. (1965). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority. Human Relations, 18(1), 57-76.
16. O'Donohue, W. & Dyslin, C. (1996). Abortion, boxing, and Zionism: Politics and the APA. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(1), 1-10.
17. Rind, B., Tomovitch, P., & Bauserman, R. (1998). A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 22-53.
18. Scarr, S. (1995). Psychological science in the public arena: Three cases of dubious influence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 164-188.
19. Smith, M. B. (1996). Comment on O'Donohue and Dyslin. New Ideas in Psychology, 14(1), 17-19.