Measuring dynamic efficiency: Theories and an integrated methodology

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 203, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 749-760

  Chen, Chien Ming ^a,b   van Dalen, Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Advertising; Data envelopment analysis; Dynamic systems; Lagged effects; Parametric programming

Indexed keywords

ADVERTISING; DEA MODELS; DYNAMIC EFFICIENCY; DYNAMIC FACTORS; DYNAMIC PRODUCTION; DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; EMPIRICAL EFFICIENCY; EVALUATION RESULTS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY; LAGGED EFFECTS; PARAMETRIC PROGRAMMING; PHARMACEUTICAL FIRMS; PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTS; PRODUCTIVITY CHANGES; RANK REVERSALS; VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION THEORY; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING;

DYNAMIC MODELS;

EID: 70449534906     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abraham M., and Lodish L. Getting the most out of advertising and promotion. Harvard Business Review 68 (1990) 50-60
2. Adams J. Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal Political Economics 98 4 (1990) 673-702
3. Ahn S., and Schmidt P. Efficient estimation of dynamic panel data models: Alternative assumptions and simplified estimation. Journal of Econometrics 76 1-2 (1997) 309-321
4. Banker R., Chang H., and Natarajan R. Productivity change, technical progress, and relative efficiency change in the public accounting industry. Management Science 51 2 (2005) 291-304
5. Bertsimas, D., Tsitsiklis, J., 1997. Introduction to Linear Optimization. Athena Scientific Belmont, Mass (Chapter 5).
6. Binder M., Hsiao C., and Pesaran M. Estimation and inference in short panel vector autoregressions with unit roots and cointegration. Econometric Theory 21 4 (2005) 795-837
7. Charnes A., Cooper W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
8. Chen C.-M. A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks. European Journal of Operational Research 194 3 (2009) 687-699
9. Clarke D. Econometric measurement of the duration of advertising effect on sales. Journal of Marketing Research 13 (1976) 345-357
10. Dekimpe M., and Hanssens D. The persistence of marketing effects on sales. Marketing Science 14 1 (1995) 1-21
11. Dekimpe M., and Hanssens D. Sustained spending and persistent response: a new look at long-term marketing profitability. Journal Marketing Research 36 4 (1999) 397-412
12. Devaraj S., and Kohli R. Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: a longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems 16 4 (2000) 41-67
13. Devaraj S., and Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link?. Management Science 49 3 (2003) 273-289
14. Emrouznejad A., Parker B., and Tavares G. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA Journal of Socio-Economics Planning Science. Socio-Economic Planning Science 42 3 (2008) 151-157
15. Emrouznejad A., and Thanassoulis E. A mathematical model for dynamic efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computations 160 (2005) 363-378
16. Evans L., and Wells G. An alternative approach to simulating VAR models. Economics Letters 12 1 (1983) 23-29
17. Färe R., Grosskopf S., and Brännlund R. Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA (1996), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
18. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Seldon B., and Tremblay V. Advertising efficiency and the choice of media mix: A case of beer. International Journal of Industrial Organization 22 4 (2004) 503-522
19. Farrell M. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) 120 3 (1957) 253-290
20. Feinberg F. continuous-time optimal advertising under S-shaped response. Management Science 47 11 (2001) 1476-1487
21. Gal T., and Greenberg H. Advances in Sensitivity Analysis and Parametric Programming (1997), Kluwer Academic Publishers
22. Gharajedaghi J. Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture (2006), Butterworth-Heinemann
23. Golany B. A note on including ordinal relations among multipliers in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 34 (1988) 1029-1033
24. Greene W. Econometric Analysis (2003), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
25. Greuner M., Kamerschen D., and Klein P. The competitive effects of advertising in the US automobile industry, 1970-1994. International Journal of the Economics of Business 7 3 (2000) 245-261
26. Henderson R., and Cockburn I. Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND Journal of Economics 27 1 (1996) 32-59
27. Herrington J., and Dempsey W. Comparing the current effects and carryover of national-, regional-, and local-sponsor advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 45 01 (2005) 60-72
28. Huergo E., and Jaumandreu J. Firm's age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization 22 (2004) 541-561
29. Huselid M., and Becker B. Methodological issues in cross-sectional and panel estimates of the human resource-firm performance link. Industrial Relations 35 (1996) 400-422
30. Ichniowski C., Shaw K., and Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. American Economic Review 87 3 (1997) 291-313
31. Landesmann M., and Scazzieri R. Production and Economic Dynamics (1996), Cambridge University Press
32. Luo X., and Donthu N. Assessing advertising media spending inefficiencies in generating sales. Journal of Business Research 58 1 (2005) 28-36
33. Luo X., and Donthu N. Marketing's credibility: A longitudinal investigation of marketing communication productivity and shareholder value. Journal of Marketing 70 4 (2006) 70-91
34. Nemoto J., and Goto M. Measurement of dynamic efficiency in production: An application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 19 2 (2003) 191-210
35. Neyman J., and Scott E. Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica 16 1 (1948) 1-32
36. Romer P. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990) 71-102
37. Rust R., Ambler T., Carpenter G., Kumar V., and Srivastava R. Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Marketing 68 4 (2004) 76-89
38. Scheel H., and Scholtes S. Continuity of DEA efficiency measures. Operations Research 51 (2003) 149-159
39. Sueyoshi T. Measuring efficiencies and returns to scale of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone in production and cost analyses. Management Science 43 6 (1997) 779-796
40. Sueyoshi T., and Sekitani K. Returns to scale in dynamic DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 161 2 (2005) 536-544
41. Thursby J., and Thursby M. Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science 48 1 (2002) 90-104
42. Tilman D., Cassman K., Matson P., Naylor R., and Polasky S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418 (2002) 671-677
43. Tulkens H., and Vanden Eeckaut P. Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects. European Journal of Operational Research 80 3 (1995) 474-499