Exposure assessment considerations for nanoparticles in the workplace

Nanotoxicology: Characterization, Dosing and Health Effects

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 71-83

  Hoover, Mark D ^a   Stefaniak, Aleksandr B ^a   Day, Gregory A ^a   Geraci, Charles L ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449531622     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 66. Ann ICRP 1994; 24(1-3).
2. Tinkle SS, Antonini JM, Rich BA, Roberts JR, Salmen R, DePree K, Adkins EJ. Skin as a route of exposure and sensitization in chronic beryllium disease. Environ Health Perspect 2003, 11: 1202-1208.
3. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Reference Man: Anatomical, Physiological and Metabolical Characteristics, ICRP Publication 23. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1975.
4. U.S. Department of Energy, Airborne Release Fractions/Rates and Respirable Fractions for Nonreactor Nuclear Facilities, U.S. Department of Energy Handbook DOE-HDBK-3010-94, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, December 1994.
5. U.S. Department of Energy, Decision Analysis Techniques, Safety Notice Issue No. 95-01, Office of Nuclear and Facility Safety, Office of Operating Experience Analysis and Feedback, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, August 1995.
6. Ramachandran G, ed. Occupational Exposure Assessment for Air Contaminants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2005.
7. Keil CB, ed. Mathematical models for estimating occupational exposures to chemicals. Fairfax, VA: AIHA Press, 2000.
8. Burstyn I, Teschke K. Studying the determinants of exposure: a review of methods. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1999; 60: 57-72.
9. Nicas M. Estimating exposure intensity in an imperfectly mixed room. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1996; 57: 542-550.
10. Cherrie JW, Schneider T. Validation of a new method for structured subjective assessment of past concentrations. Ann Occup Hyg 1999; 43: 235-245.
11. Nicas M, Jayjock M. Uncertainty in exposure estimates made by modeling versus monitoring. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2002; 63: 275-283.
12. Day GA, Dufresne A, Stefaniak AB, Schuler CR, Stanton ML, Miller WE, Kent MS, Deubner DC, Kreiss K, Hoover MD. Exposure pathway assessment at a copper-beryllium alloy facility. Ann Occup Hyg 2007; 51: 67-80.
13. Schneider T, Vermeulen R, Brouwer DH, Cherrie JW, Kromhout H, Fogh CL. Conceptual model for assessment of dermal exposure. Occup Environ Med 1999; 56: 765-773.
14. Fenske RA. Dermal exposure assessment techniques. Ann Occup Hyg 1993; 37: 687-706.
15. CEN, European Committee for Standardization. Workplace Exposure-Strategy of the Evaluation of Dermal Exposure. TC137/WG 6 (prCEN/TR 15278), Berlin: European Committee for Standardization, 2005.
16. CEN, European Committee for Standardization. Workplace Exposure-Measurement of Dermal Exposure-Principles and Methods. TC137/WG 6 (prCEN/TR 15279), Berlin: European Committee for Standardization, 2005.
17. Maynard AD, Baron PA, Foley M, Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Castranova V. Exposure to carbon nanotube material: aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single walled carbon nanotube material. J Toxicol Environ Health 2004; 67: 87-107.
18. Brouwer DH, Kroese R, van Hemmen JJ. Transfer of contaminants from surface to hands: experimental assessment of linearity of the exposure process, adherence to the skin, and area exposed during fixed pressure and repeated contact with surfaces contaminated with a powder. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1999; 14: 231-239.
19. Que Hee SS, Peace B, Clark CS, Boyle JR, Bornschein RL, Hammond PB. Evolution of efficient methods to sample lead sources, such as house dust and hand dust, in the homes of children. Environ Res 1989; 38: 77-95.
20. Cherrie JW, Robertson A. Biologically relevant assessment of dermal exposure. Ann Occup Hyg 1995; 39: 387-392.
21. Bullock WH, Ignacio JS, eds. A Strategy for Assessing and Managing Occupational Exposures, 3rd ed. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association Press, 2006.
22. Kromhout H, Symanski E, Rappaport SM. A comprehensive evaluation of within-and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. Ann Occup Hyg 1993; 37(3): 253-270.
23. Decisioneering, Inc. Crystal Ball Version 5.2 User Manual: Forecasting and Risk Analysis for Spreadsheet Users. Denver, CO: Decisioneering, Inc., 2002.
24. Kromhout H, Vermeulen R. Temporal, personal and spatial variability in dermal exposure. Ann Occup Hyg 2001; 45: 257-273.
25. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, ed. Exposure Assessment in Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2003.
26. Checkoway H, Pearce N, Kriebel D, eds. Research Methods in Occupational Epidemiology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2004.
27. Smith TJ. Issues in Exposure and Dose Assessment for Epidemiology and Risk Assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2002; 8(6): 1267-1293.