Sensitivity to first- and second-order motion and form in children and adults

Vision Research

Volumn 49, Issue 23, 2009, Pages 2774-2781

  Armstrong, Vickie ^a   Maurer, Daphne ^a   Lewis, Terri L ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Children; Development; First order; Form; Motion; Second order; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CHILD; GRATING; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; MODULATION; MOTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VELOCITY;

ADOLESCENT; AGING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70449518980     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allen H.A., Ledgeway T., and Hess R.F. Poor encoding of position by contrast-defined motion. Vision Research 44 17 (2004) 1985-1999
2. Ashida H., Lingnau A., Wall M.B., and Smith A.T. FMRI adaptation reveals separate mechanisms for first-order and second-order motion. Journal of Neurophysiology 97 2 (2007) 1319-1325
3. Banton T., Bertenthal B.I., and Seaks J. Infants' sensitivity to statistical distributions of motion direction and speed. Vision Research 39 20 (1999) 3417-3430
4. Banton T., Dobkins K., and Bertenthal B.I. Infant direction discrimination thresholds. Vision Research 41 8 (2001) 1049-1056
5. Bertone A., Hanck J., Cornish K.M., and Faubert J. Development of static and dynamic perception for luminance-defined and texture-defined information. Neuroreport 19 2 (2008) 225-228
6. Braddick O., Birtles D., Wattam-Bell J., and Atkinson J. Motion- and orientation-specific cortical responses in infancy. Vision Research 45 25-26 (2005) 3169-3179
7. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
8. Dumoulin S.O., Baker Jr. C.L., Hess R.F., and Evans A.C. Cortical specialization for processing first- and second-order motion. Cerebral Cortex 13 12 (2003) 1375-1385
9. Dunnett C.W. A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50 (1955) 1096-1121
10. Ellemberg D., Lavoie K., Lewis T.L., Maurer D., Lepore F., and Guillemot J.P. Longer VEP latencies and slower reaction times to the onset of second-order motion than to the onset of first-order motion. Vision Research 43 6 (2003) 651-658
11. Ellemberg D., Lewis T.L., Meghji K.S., Maurer D., Guillemot J.P., and Lepore F. Comparison of sensitivity to first- and second-order local motion in 5-year-olds and adults. Spatial Vision 16 5 (2003) 419-428
12. Harvey L. Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 18 (1986) 623-632
13. Howell D.C. Statistical methods for psychology. 5th ed. (2002), Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA
14. Hutchinson C.V., and Ledgeway T. Sensitivity to spatial and temporal modulations of first-order and second-order motion. Vision Research 46 3 (2006) 324-335
15. Kiorpes, L., Gavlin, A., & El-Shamayleh, Y. (2006). Perception of texture in macaque monkeys: Development and amblyopia [Abstract]. Neuroscience meeting planner. Atlanta, GA: Society for Neuroscience. [online, Program No. 604.8].
16. Kirk R.E. Statistics: An introduction (1999), Harcourt Brace College Publishers
17. Ledgeway T., and Hess R.F. Failure of direction identification for briefly presented second-order motion stimuli: Evidence for weak direction selectivity of the mechanisms encoding motion. Vision Research 42 14 (2002) 1739-1758
18. Ledgeway T., and Hutchinson C.V. The influence of spatial and temporal noise on the detection of first-order and second-order orientation and motion direction. Vision Research 45 16 (2005) 2081-2094
19. Ledgeway T., and Smith A.T. Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision. Vision Research 34 20 (1994) 2727-2740
20. Ledgeway T., and Smith A.T. The duration of the motion aftereffect following adaptation to first-order and second-order motion. Perception 23 (1994) 1211
21. Manahilov V., Simpson W.A., and Calvert J. Why is second-order vision less efficient than first-order vision?. Vision Research 45 21 (2005) 2759-2772
22. Nishida S., Ledgeway T., and Edwards M. Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system. Vision Research 37 19 (1997) 2685-2698
23. Parrish E.E., Giaschi D.E., Boden C., and Dougherty R. The maturation of form and motion perception in school age children. Vision Research 45 7 (2005) 827-837
24. Pierce C.A., Block R.A., and Aguinis H. Cautionary note on reporting eta-squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 64 6 (2004) 916
25. Seiffert A.E., and Cavanagh P. Position displacement, not velocity, is the cue to motion detection of second-order stimuli. Vision Research 38 22 (1998) 3569-3582
26. Seiffert A.E., and Cavanagh P. Position-based motion perception for color and texture stimuli: Effects of contrast and speed. Vision Research 39 25 (1999) 4172-4185
27. Smith A.T., Hess R.F., and Baker C.L. Direction identification thresholds for second-order motion in central and peripheral vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 11 2 (1994) 506-514
28. Smith A.T., and Ledgeway T. Separate detection of moving luminance and contrast modulations: Fact or artifact?. Vision Research 37 1 (1997) 45-62
29. Thibault D., Brosseau-Lachaine O., Faubert J., and Vital-Durand F. Maturation of the sensitivity for luminance and contrast modulated patterns during development of normal and pathological human children. Vision Research 47 12 (2007) 1561-1569
30. Wilson H.R., Ferrera V.P., and Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Visual Neuroscience 9 1 (1992) 79-97