Application of management frameworks to manageworkflow-based systems: A case study on a large scale e-science project

2009 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, ICWS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 519-526

  Perera, Srinath ^a   Marru, Suresh ^a   Gunarathne, Thilina ^a   Gannon, Dennis ^a   Plale, Beth ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC MANAGEMENT; CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; CYBER INFRASTRUCTURES; DISTRIBUTED MANAGEMENT; E-SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT ARCHITECTURES; MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS; SENSOR DATA; WELL-COVERED;

RESEARCH; WEB SERVICES;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 70449492748     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICWS.2009.52     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Apache axis2 project. online. http://ws.apache.org/axis2/.
2. Drools. online. http://labs.jboss.com/drools/.
3. Hasthi lead integration details. online. http://extreme.indiana.edu/ hasthi/lead/.
4. Oasis web services distributed management. online, August 2006. www.oasis-open.org/committees/wsdm/.
5. E. Adams. Optimizing Preventive Service of Software Products. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 28(1):2- 14, 1984.
6. E. Al-Shaer, H. Abdel-Wahab, and K. Maly. Hifi: A new monitoring architecture for distributed systems management. In International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 1999.
7. T. Andrews, F. Curbera, et al. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services 1.1, May 2003.
8. J. Baumann. Mobile Agents: Control Algorithms, section Appendix B, Introduction to Fault Tolerance. Springer Verlag, 2000.
9. G. Candea, A. Brown, A. Fox, and D. Patterson. Recovery- Oriented Computing: Building Multitier Dependability. COMPUTER, pages 60-67, 2004.
10. K. Droegemeier et al. Linked environments for atmospheric discovery (lead): Architecture, technology road map and deployment strategy. In International Conference on Interactive Information Processing Systems, 2005.
11. H. Gadgil, G. Fox, et al. Scalable, fault-tolerant management of grid services. In IEEE Cluster 2007.
12. A. Ganek and T. Corbi. The drawing of the autonomic computing era. IBM Systems Journal, 42(1):5-18, 2003.
13. D. Garlan, S.-W. Cheng, et al. Rainbow: Architecturebased self-adaptation with reusable infrastructure. Computer, 37(10):46-54, 2004.
14. J. Gray and D. Siewiorek. High-availability computer systems. Computer, 24(9):39-48, 1991.
15. M. Jarrett and R. Seviora. Constructing an autonomic computing infrastructure using cougaar. In International Workshop on Engineering of Autonomic & Autonomous Systems, pages 119-128, 2006.
16. T. Koch and B. Krämer. Rules and agents for automated management of distributed systems. Distributed System Engineering, 3:110-114, 1996.
17. T. Koch, B. Kramer, and G. Rohde. On a rule based management architecture. In Workshop on Services in Distributed and Networked Environments, page 68, 1995.
18. S. Perera and D. Gannon. A Scalable and Robust Coordination Architecture for Distributed Management. 2008. Indiana University, Department of Computer Science Technical Report TR-659, 2008.
19. S. Perera, S. Marru, and D. Gannon. Monitoring and managing e-science cyber-infrastructures: A case study. eScience, IEEE International Conference on, 2008.
20. G. Valetto and G. Kaiser. A case study in software adaptation. In WOSS '02: Proceedings of the first workshop on Self-healing systems, pages 73-78, 2002.
21. S. Vinoski. Chain of responsibility. Internet Computing, IEEE, 6(6):80-83, 2002.
22. M. Wawrzoniak, L. Peterson, and T. Roscoe. Sophia: an information plane for networked systems. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 34(1):15-20, 2004.