Conceptualising spatial planning outcomes: Towards an integrative measurement framework

Town Planning Review

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 481-

  Wong, Cecilia ^a   Watkins, Craig ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER; URBAN PLANNING;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 70449450131     PISSN: 00410020     EISSN: 1478341X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2009.8     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adams, D. and Watkins, C. (2002), Greenfields, Brownfields and Housing Development, Oxford, Blackwells.
2. Adams, D., Watkins, C. and White, M. (2005), Planning, Public Policy and Property Markets, Oxford, Blackwells.
3. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
4. Audit Commission (2000), On Target: the Practice of Performance Indicators, London, Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales.
5. Barker, K. (2006), Barker Review of Land Use Planning: Final Report, London, HMSO.
6. Bramley, G. (1998), 'Measuring indicators of planning restraint and their impact of housing land supply', Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 31-57.
7. Bramley, G. and Watkins, C. (1996), Steering the Housing Market, Bristol, Policy Press.
8. Bramley, G., Bartlett, W. and Lambert, C. (1995), Planning, the Market and Private Housebuilding, London, UCL Press.
9. Brody, S. D., Highfield, W. and Carrasco, V. (2004), 'Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida', Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 33-50.
10. Campbell, S. (1996), 'Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development', Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, 296-312.
11. Carmona, M. and Sieh, L. (2006), Measuring Quality in Planning: Managing the Performance Process, London, Taylor and Francis.
12. Cheshire, P. and Hilber, C. (2008), 'Office space supply restrictions in Britain: the political economy of market revenge', Economic Journal, 118, F185-221.
13. Cheshire, P. and Sheppard, S. (1988), 'British planning policy and access to housing', Urban Studies, 26, 469-85.
14. Cho, M. (1997), 'Congestion effects of spatial growth restrictions: a model and empirical analysis', Real Estate Economics, 25, 409-38.
15. Dawkins, C. J. and Nelson, A. C. (2002), 'Urban containment policies: an international comparison with implications for future research', Land Use Policy, 19, 1-12.
16. DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government) (2007), The New Performance Framework for Local Authorities and Local Authority Partnerships: Single Set of National Indicators, London, DCLG.
17. European Commission (2000), 'Indicators for monitoring and evaluation: an indicative methodology' (The New Progamming Period 2000-2006 Methodological Working Papers 3), Brussels, European Commission.
18. Evans, A. W. (1988), No Room! No Room! The Costs of the British Town and Country Planning System (IEA Occassional Paper 79, Institute of Economic Affairs, London).
19. Evans, A. W. (1996), 'The impact of land use planning and tax subsidies on the supply and price of housing in Britain: a comment', Urban Studies, 33, 581-85.
20. Evans, A. W. and Hartwich, O. M. (2005), Unaffordable Housing: Fables and Myths, London, Policy Exchange.
21. Faludi, A. (2000), 'The performance of spatial planning', Planning Practice and Research, 15, 299-318.
22. Fischel, W. (1989), Do Growth Controls Matter? A Review of Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Local Government Land Use Regulation, Cambridge, MA, Lincoln Institute.
23. Hall, P., Gracey, H., Drewett, R. and Thomas, R. (1973), The Containment of Urban England, London, Allen and Unwin.
24. Henneberry, J., McGough, T. and Mouzakis, F. (2005), 'Estimating the impact of planning on commercial property markets', in D. Adams et al. (eds.) Planning, Public Policy and Property Markets, Oxford, Blackwells.
25. HM Government (2004), Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, London, HMSO.
26. HM Government (2005), Securing the Future: Delivering UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy, Norwich, The Stationary Office.
27. HM Government (2006), Strong and Prosperous Communities - The Local Government White Paper, Norwich, HMSO.
28. HM Government (2007), Planning for a Sustainable Future White Paper, Norwich, HMSO.
29. HM Treasury (2007), The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, Norwich, The Stationary Office.
30. Hoernig, H. and Seasons, M. (2004), 'Monitoring of indicators in local and regional planning practice: concepts and issues', Planning Practice and Research, 19, 81-99.
31. House of Commons (2003), Planning, Competitiveness and Productivity (House of Commons Fourth Report of Session 2002-03, London).
32. Hui, E. C. and Ho, V. S. (2003), 'Does the planning system effect house prices? Theory and Evidence from Hong Kong', Habitat International, 27, 339-59.
33. Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. E. (2000), 'Indicators for sustainable communities: a strategy for building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence', Planning Theory and Practice, 1, 173-86.
34. Jackson, C. and Watkins, C. (2007), 'Supply-side policies and retail property market performance', Environment and Planning A, 39, 1134-46.
35. Lee, C.-M. and Linneman, P. (1998), 'Dynamics of the greenbelt amenity effect on the land market - the case of Seoul's greenbelt', Real Estate Economics, 26, 107-29.
36. Malpezzi, S. (1996), 'Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in US metropolitan areas', Journal of Housing Research, 7, 209-41.
37. Monk, S. and Whitehead, C. (1999), 'Evaluating the impact of planning controls in the UK - some implications for housing', Land Economics, 75, 74-93.
38. Morrison, N. and Pearce, B. (2000), 'Developing indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of the UK land use planning system', Town Planning Review, 71, 191-211.
39. Nadin, V. (2002), 'Visions and visioning in European spatial planning', in A. Faludi (ed.) European Spatial Planning: Lessons for North America, Cambridge, MA, The Lincoln Institute, 121-37.
40. ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) (2002), Monitoring Regional Planning Guidance: Good Practice Guidance on Targets and Indicators, London, ODPM.
41. ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) (2005a), Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development, London, ODPM.
42. ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) (2005b), Local Development Framework Monitoring: A Good Practice Guide, London, ODPM.
43. ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) (2006), State of the English Cities, London, ODPM.
44. Pennington, M. (2000), Planning and the Political Market: Public Choice and the Politics of Government Failure, London, Athlone.
45. Pogodzinski, M. J. and Sass, T. R. (1990), 'A review of zoning theory', Land Economics, 66, 294-314.
46. Pryce, G. (1999), 'Construction elasticities and land availability: a two-stage least squares model of housing supply using the variable elasticity approach', Urban Studies, 36, 2283-304.
47. Roger Tym and Partners (2002), Planning, Competitiveness and Productivity Literature Review (commissioned by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister).
48. RTPI (Royal Town Planning Institute) (2007), Planning Together: Local Strategic Partnerships and Spatial Planning: A Practical Guide, London, RTPI.
49. Sawicki, D. S. (2002), 'Improving community indicator systems: injecting more social science into the folk movement', Planning Theory and Practice, 3, 13-32.
50. Swain, D. and Hollar, D. (2003), 'Measuring progress: community indicators and their quality of life', International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 789-814.
51. University of Sheffield with Halcrow (2006), Valuing Planning Obligations in England, London, Department for Communities and Local Government.
52. Van Gestel, T. and Faludi, A. (2005), 'Towards a European Territorial Cohesion Assessment Network: a bright future for ESPON?' Town Planning Review, 76, 81-92.
53. Weaver, C., Jessop, J. and Das, V. (1985), 'Rationality in the public interest: notes toward a new synthesis', in M. Breheny and A. Hopper (eds.) Rationality in Planning: Critical Essays on the Role of Rationality in Urban and Regional Planning, London: Pion Limited, 145-65.
54. Wong, C. (2002a), 'Is there a need for a fully integrated spatial planning framework for the United Kingdom?', Planning Theory and Practice, 3, 277-300.
55. Wong, C. (2002b), 'Development indicators to inform local development in England', Urban Studies, 39, 1833-63.
56. Wong, C. (2006), Quantitative Indicators for Urban and Regional Planning: The Interplay of Policy and Methods, London, Royal Town Planning Institute Library Book Series, Routledge.
57. Wong, C., Baker, M. and Kidd, S. (2006a), 'Monitoring of spatial strategies: the case of local development documents in England', Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 533-52.
58. Wong, C., Jeffrey, P., Green, A., Owen, D., Coombes, M. and Raybould, S. (2004), Developing a Town and City Indicators Database (Final Report to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, University of Liverpool, Liverpool).
59. Wong, C., Rae, A. and Schulze Bäing, A. (2006b), Uniting Britain - The Evidence Base: Spatial Structure and Key Drivers, London, Royal Town Planning Institute.
60. Wong, C., Rae, A., Baker, M., Hincks, S., Kingston, R., Watkins, C. and Ferrari, E. (2008), Measuring the Outcomes of Spatial Planning in England, London, Royal Town Planning Institute and the Department for Communities and Local Government.