Advancing e-governance: Comparing Taiwan and the United States

Public Administration Review

Volumn 69, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages

  Chen, Yu Che ^a   Hsieh, Jun Yi ^b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TAIPEI   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449440412     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02103.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Berry, Frances, and Ralph Brower. 2005. Intergovernmental and Intersectoral Management: Weaving Networking, Contracting Out, and Management Roles into Third Party Management. Public Performance and Management Review 29 (1 7 17.
2. Brown, Mary Maureen. 2007. Understanding E-Government Benefits. American Review of Public Administration 37 (2 178 197.
3. Carrizales, Tony. 2008. Functions of E-Government: A Study of Municipal Practices. State and Local Government Review 40 (1 12 26.
4. Carrizales, Tony, Marc Holzer, and Aroon Manoharan. 2008. Worldwide E-Governance. In E-Government Research: Policy and Management, edited by Donald Norris, 98 119. Hershey, PA : Idea Group.
5. Carter, Lemuria, and France Bélanger. 2005. The Utilization of E-Government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation, and Acceptance Factors. Information Systems Journal 15 (1 5 25.
6. Chen, Don-yun, Tong-yi Huang, and Naiyi Hsaio. 2003. The Management of Citizen Participation in Taiwan: A Case Study of Taipei City Government's Citizen Complaints System. International Journal of Public Administration 26 (5 525 547.
7. Comfort, Louise. 2007. Crisis Management in Hindsight: Cognition, Communication, Coordination, and Control. Special issue, Public Administration Review 67 : 189 197.
8. Coursey, David, and Donald Norris. 2008. Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment. Public Administration Review 68 (3 523 536.
9. Curtin, Gregory G., Michael H. Sommer, and Veronika Vis-Sommer. 2003. The World of E-Government. Binghamton, NY : Haworth Press.
10. Dufner, Donna, Lyn M. Holley, and B. J. Reed. 2002. Can Private Sector Strategic Information Systems Planning Techniques Work for the Public Sector? Communications of the Association for Information Systems 8 : 413 431.
11. Fletcher, Patricia Diamond. 1999. Strategic Planning for Information Technology Management in State Government. In Information Technology and Computer Applications in Public Administration: Issues and Trends, edited by G. David Garson, 81 98. Hershey, PA : Idea Group.
12. Fountain, Jane. 2001. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press.
13. Fredrickson, H. George, and Kevin B. Smith. 2002. The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
14. Garson, G. David. 2006. Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State. Sudbury, MA : Jones and Bartlett.
15. Ho, Alfred Tat-Kei. 2002. Reinventing Local Governments and the E-Government Initiative. Public Administration Review 62 (4 434 444.
16. Horrigan, John. 2004. How Americans Get in Touch with Government: Internet Users Benefit from the Efficiency of E-Government, but Multiple Channels Are Still Needed for Citizens to Reach Agencies and Solve Problems. Washington, DC : Pew Internet & American Life Project.
17. International City/County Management Association (ICMA). 2004. 2004 E-Government Survey. Washington, DC : International City/County Management Association.
18. International Telecommunication Union. 2007. World Information Society Report 2007: Beyond WSIS. New York : International Telecommunication Union, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
19. Kakabadse, Andrew, K. Nada Kakabadse, and Alexander Kouzmin. 2003. Reinventing the Democratic Governance Project through Information Technology? A Growing Agenda for Debate. Public Administration Review 63 (1 44 60.
20. Kamarch, Elaine Ciulla, and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., eds. 2002. Governance.com : Democracy in the Information Age. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press.
21. Layne, Karen, and Jungwoo Lee. 2001. Developing Fully Functional E-Government: A Four-Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly 18 (2 122 136.
22. McGuire, Michael. 2006. Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It. Special issue, Public Administration Review 66 : 33 43.
23. Moynihan, Donald. 2005. Leveraging Collaborative Networks in Infrequent Emergency Situations. Washington, DC : IBM Center for the Business of Government.
24. Norris, Pippa. 2005. The Impact of the Internet on Political Activism: Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 1 (1 20 39.
25. O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 1997. Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research-Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 57 (1 45 52.
26. O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr., and Kenneth J. Meier. 2004. Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Matching Structural Networks and Managerial Networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (4 469 494.
27. Peters, B. Guy. 1998. Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods. New York : New York University Press.
28. Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley : University of California Press.
29. Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC). 2001. Electronic Government Promotion Plan: 2001-2004 [in Chinese]. Taipei : Research, Development and Evaluation Commission.
30. Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC). 2007a. Digital Divide in Taiwan 2007: Summary. Taipei : Research, Development and Evaluation Commission.
31. Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC). 2007b. E-Government Country Report for ICA Conference 2007: Taiwan. Taipei : Research, Development and Evaluation Commission.
32. Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC). 2007c. My E-Government - The E-Government Entry Point of Taiwan. Taipei : Research, Development and Evaluation Commission.
33. Research, Development and Evaluation Commission (RDEC). 2008. Electronic Government 2007 Report [in Chinese]. Taipei : Research, Development and Evaluation Commission.
34. Science and Technology Advisory Group (STAG). 2007. E-Taiwan Challenge 2008 Program: Ubiquitous Network Society. Taipei : Science and Technology Advisory Group.
35. Skocpol, Theda, and Morris P. Fiorina, eds. 1999. Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press.
36. Tolbert, Caroline, and Karen Mossberger. 2006. The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government. Public Administration Review 66 (3 354 369.
37. United Nations (UN). 2005. Global E-Government Readiness Report 2005: From E-Government to E-Inclusion. New York : United Nations.
38. United Nations (UN). 2008. UN E-Government Survey 2008: From E-Government to Connected Governance. New York : United Nations.
39. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2005. Management Reform: Assessing the President's Management Agenda. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office. GAO-050574T.
40. Welch, Eric, Charles Hinnant, and M. Jae Moon. 2005. Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (3 371 392.
41. West, Darrell. 2008. Improving Technology Utilization in Electronic Government around the World. Washington, DC : Brookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/∼/media/Files/rc/reports/2008/0817-egovernment- west/0817-egovernment-west.pdf [accessed August 24, 2009].
42. World Economic Forum (WEF). 2006. Global Information Technology Report 2005-2006. Geneva : World Economic Forum.
43. World Economic Forum (WEF). 2008. Global Information Technology Report 2007-2008. Geneva : World Economic Forum.
44. Yin, Robert. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.