Land use qualities identified in remotely-sensed images

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 2411-2427

  Wastfelt A ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); SATELLITE IMAGERY; SEMANTICS;

ECOLOGICAL RESPONSE; LAND COVER; POST CLASSIFICATION; REMOTELY SENSED IMAGES; SATELLITE DATA;

LAND USE;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LAND USE; REFLECTANCE; REMOTE SENSING; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 70449435505     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: 13665901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431160802552694     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. ARBIA, G., BENEDETTI, R. and ESPA, G., 1999, Contextual classification in image analysis: an assessment of accuracy of ICM. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 30, pp. 443-455.
2. BARNSLEY, M.J. and BARR, S.L., 1996, Inferring urban land use from satellite sensor images using kernel-based spatial reclassification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62, pp. 949-958.
3. BIBBY, P. and SHEPARD, J., 2000, Land use, and representation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, pp. 583-598.
4. EHLERS, M., GÄHLER, M. and JANOWSKY, R., 2003, Automated analysis of ultra high-resolution remote-sensing data for biotope type mapping: new possibilities and challenges. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57, pp. 325-326.
5. GAMANAYA, R., DE MAEYER, P. and DE PAPPER, M., 2007, An automated satellite image-classification design using object-oriented segmentation algoritms: a move towards standardization. Expert Systems with Applications, 32, pp. 616-624.
6. GONG, P. and HOWARTH, P.J., 1992, Land use classification of SPOT HRV data using a cover-frequency method. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13, pp. 1459-1471.
7. GURNEY, M.C. and TOWNSHED, J.R.G., 1983, The use of contextual information in the classification of remote sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 49, pp. 55-64.
8. GÄRDENFORS, P., 2000, Conceptual Spaces. The Geometry of Thought. A Bradford Book (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
9. HE, H. and COLLET, C., 1999, Combining spectral and textural features for multispectral image classification with artificial neural networks. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 32, part 7-4-3 W6.
10. KIEFER, R.W. and LILLESAND, T.M., 1994, Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation (New York: Wiley & Sons).
11. SUN, W., HEIDT, V., GONG, P. and XU, G., 2003, Information fusion for rural land-use classification with high-resolution satellite imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(4), pp. 883-890.
12. WALSTRA, J. and VAN DER KWAST, J., 2001, Contextual Vegetation Classification. Using the Spatial Reclassification Kernel to Classify Heterogeneous Vegetation from Dais Images. Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Utrecht University.
13. WICKS, T.E., SMITH, G.M. and CURRAN, P.J., 2002, Polygon-based aggregation of remotely-sensed data for regional ecological analyses. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 4, pp. 161-173.
14. WÄSTFELT, A., 2004, Continuous Landscapes in Finite Space. Making Sense of Satellite Images in Social Science (Uppsala: Hugo forlag).