Enhancing the effectiveness of policy-relevant integrative research in rural areas

Area

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 414-424

  White, Piran C L ^a   Cinderby, Steve ^a   Raffaelli, Dave ^a   de Bruin, Annemarieke ^a   Holt, Alison ^a   Huby, Meg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environmental; Interdisciplinary; International; Knowledge transfer; Policy integration; Scale; Transdisciplinary

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; KNOWLEDGE; POLICY APPROACH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RESEARCH WORK; RURAL AREA;

EID: 70449431344     PISSN: 00040894     EISSN: 14754762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00871.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bateman I J, Brouwer R, Davies H, Day B H, Deflandre A, Di Falco S, Georgiou S, Hadley D, Hutchins M, Jones A P, Kay D, Leeks G, Lewis M, Lovett A A, Neal C, Posen P, Rigby D, Turner R K. Analysing the agricultural costs and non-market benefits of implementing the Water Framework Directive. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006, 57:221-37.
2. Bennett A F, Hinsley S A, Bellamy P E, Swetnam R D, MacNally R. Do regional gradients in land use influence richness, composition and turnover of bird assemblages in small woods?. Biological Conservation 2004, 119:191-206.
3. Bibby P, Shepherd J. Developing a new classification of urban and rural areas for policy purposes - the methodology 2004, Office for National Statistics, London
4. Bracken I, Martin D. The generation of spatial population distributions from census centroid data. Environment and Planning A 1989, 21:537-43.
5. Brewer G D. The challenges of inter-disciplinarity. Policy Sciences 1999, 32:327-37.
6. Bruce A, Lyall C, Tait J, Williams R. Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures 2004, 36:457-70.
7. Bruhn J G. Inter-disciplinary research: a philosophy, art form, artifact, or antidote. Integrative Physiological and Behavioural Science 2000, 35:58-66.
8. Burgess J. Follow the argument where it leads: some personal reflections on 'policy-relevant' research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 2005, 30:273-81.
9. Dervin B. Human studies and user studies: a call for methodological inter-disciplinarity. Information Research 2003, 9:1-27.
10. Dorling D, Shaw M. Geographies of the agenda: public policy, the discipline and its returns. Progress in Human Geography 2002, 26:629-46.
11. Evans E, Ashley R, Hall J, Penning-Roswell A, Sayers P, Thorne C, Watkinson A. Foresight future flooding, scientific summary: volume 1: future risks and their drivers 2004a, Office of Science and Technology, London
12. Evans E, Ashley R, Hall J, Penning-Roswell A, Sayers P, Thorne C, Watkinson A. Future flooding scientific summary: volume 2: managing future risks 2004b, Office of Science and Technology, London
13. Ewel K C. Natural resource management: the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Ecosystems 2001, 4:716-22.
14. Huby M, Cinderby S, Crowe A M, Gillings S, McClean C J, Moran D, Owen A, White P C L. The association of natural, social and economic factors with bird species richness in rural England. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006, 57:295-312.
15. Jakobsen C H, Hels T, McLaughlin W J. Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison. Forest Policy and Economics 2004, 6:15-31.
16. Kinzig A P. Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems 2001, 4:709-15.
17. Lowe P, Phillipson J. Reflexive interdisciplinary research: the making of a research programme on the rural economy and land use. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006, 57:165-84.
18. Martin R. Geography and public policy: the case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography 2001, 25:189-210.
19. Martin R. A geography for policy, or a policy for geography? A response to Dorling and Shaw. Progress in Human Geography 2002, 26:642-4.
20. Marzano M, Carss D N, Bell S. Working to make interdisciplinarity work: investing in communication and interpersonal relationships. Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006, 57:185-97.
21. Massey D. Practising policy relevance. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 2000, 24:131-4.
22. Massey D. Geography, policy and politics: a response to Dorling and Shaw. Progress in Human Geography 2002, 26:645-6.
23. Merenlender A M, Huntsinger L, Guthey G, Fairfax S K. Land trusts and conservation easements: who is conserving what for whom?. Conservation Biology 2004, 18:65-75.
24. Moxey A, McClean C J, Allanson P. Transforming the spatial basis of agricultural census cover data. Soil Use and Management 1995, 11:21-5.
25. Norgaard R B. Coordinating disciplinary and organizational ways of knowing. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 1992, 42:205-16.
26. The English indices of deprivation 2004 2004, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London
27. Pain R. Social geography: seven deadly myths in policy research. Progress in Human Geography 2006, 30:250-9.
28. Patz J A, Daszak P, Tabor G M, Aguirre A A, Pearl M, Epstein J, Wolfe N D, Kilpatrick A M, Foufopoulos J, Molyneux D, Bradley D J. Unhealthy landscapes: policy recommendations on land use change and infectious disease emergence. Environmental Health Perspectives 2004, 112:1092-8.
29. Stratford E, Mazur N, Lunney D, Bennett D. Managing the koala problem: interdisciplinary perspectives. Conservation Biology 2000, 14:610-18.
30. Tress B, Tress G, Fry G. Potential and limitations of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies 2003, Delta Program, Wageningen
31. Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Opdam P. Defining concepts and the process of knowledge production in integrative research. From landscape research to landscape planning: aspects of integration, education and application 2005a, in, eds, Springer, Berlin
32. Tress B, Tress G, Fry G. Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice. Landscape and Urban Planning 2005b, 70:177-91.
33. Tress G, Tress B, Fry G. Analysis of the barriers to integration in landscape research projects. Land Use Policy 2007, 24:374-85.
34. Ward K. Geography and public policy: a recent history of policy relevance. Progress in Human Geography 2005, 29:310-19.
35. Winder N, Tress B, Tress G, van der Valk A, Fry G. Successes and problems when conducting interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary (= integrative) research. Potential and limitations of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies 2003, 74-90. in, eds, Delta Program, Wageningen
36. Yli-Pelkonen V, Niemela J. Linking ecological and social systems in cities: urban planning in Finland as a case. Biodiversity and Conservation 2005, 14:1947-67.