High-conductance states on a neuromorphic hardware system

Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1524-1530

  Kaplan, Bernhard ^a   Brüderle, Daniel ^a   Schemmel, Johannes ^a   Meier, Karlheinz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORTICAL NEURONS; DIRECT ACCESS; HARDWARE DEVICES; HARDWARE SYSTEM; HIGH CONDUCTANCE STATE; MEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE; MEMBRANE DYNAMICS; NEUROMORPHIC; PROOF OF PRINCIPLES; SOFTWARE SIMULATION; SYNAPTIC INPUT; TIME CONSTANTS;

NEURAL NETWORKS; NEURONS;

MEMBRANES;

EID: 70449410969     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IJCNN.2009.5178951     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Y. Shu, A. Hasenstaub, M. Badoual, T. Bal, and D. A. McCormick. Barrages of synaptic activity control the gain and sensitivity of cortical neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 23 (32) : 10388-10401, November 2003.
2. A. Destexhe, M. Rudolph, and D. Pare. The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4:739-751, 2003.
3. S. E. Boustani, M. Pospischil, M. Rudolph-Lilith, and A. Destexhe. Activated cortical states: experiments, analyses and models. Journal of Physiology (Paris), 101:99-109, 2007.
4. R. Cossart, D. Aronov, and R. Yuste. Attractor dynamics of network up states in the neocortex. Nature, 423:238-283, 2003.
5. J. Anderson, I. Lampl, I. Reichova, M. Carandini, and D. Ferster. Stimulus dependence of two-state fluctuations of membrane potential in cat visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 3:617-621, 2000.
6. A. Kumar, S. Schrader, A. Aertsen, and S. Rotter. The high-conductance state of cortical networks. Neural Computation, 20 (1) : 1-43, Jan 2008.
7. D. J. Wielaard, M. Shelley, D. McLaughlin, and R. Shapley. How simple cells are made in a nonlinear network model of the visual cortex. J. Neurosci., 21 (14) :5203-5211, 2001.
8. M. Shelley, D. McLaughlin, R. Shapley, and J. Wielaard. States of high conductance in a large-scale model of the visual cortex. J. Comp. Neurosci., 13:93-109, 2002.
9. G. Bi and M. Poo. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. Neural Computation, 9:503-514, 1997.
10. Y. Dan and M. Poo. Spike timing-dependent plasticity of neural circuits. Neuron, 44 (l) :23-30, September 2004.
11. B. Sakmann and E. Neher, editors. Single-channel recording. Plenum press, 1995.
12. R. S. Zucker and W. G. Regehr. Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Physiol., 64:355-405, 2002.
13. A. Morrison, C. Mehring, T. Geisel, A. Aertsen, and M. Diesmann. Advancing the boundaries of high connectivity network simulation with distributed computing. Neural Comput., 17 (8) :1776-1801, 2005.
14. J. Schemmel, A. Grübl, K. Meier, and E. Muller. Implementing synaptic plasticity in a VLSI spiking neural network model. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN'06). IEEE Press, 2006.
15. J. Schemmel, D. Brüderle, K. Meier, and B. Ostendorf Modeling synaptic plasticity within networks of highly accelerated I&F neurons. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS'07). IEEE Press, 2007.
16. D. Brüderle, A. Grübl, K. Meier, E. Muller, and J. Schemmel. A software framework for tuning the dynamics of neuromorphic silicon towards biology. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (IWANN'07), volume LNCS 4507, pages 479-486. Springer Verlag, 2007.
17. A. P. Davison, D. Brüderle, J. Eppler, J. Kremkow, E. Muller, D. Pecevski, L. Perrinet, and P. Yger. PyNN: a common interface for neuronal network simulators. Front. Neuroinform., 2 (11), 2008.
18. R. T. Braden. RFC 1122: Requirements for Internet hosts mdash; communication layers, October 1989.
19. M. Rudolph and A. Destexhe. Analytical integrate-and-fire neuron models with conductance-based dynamics for event-driven simulation strategies. Neural Comput., 18 (9) :2146-2210, 2006.
20. S. Philipp, A. Griibl, K. Meier, and J. Schemmel. Interconnecting VLSI spiking neural networks using isochronous connections. In Proceedings of the 9th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks (IWANN'2007), volume LNCS 4507, pages 471-478. Springer Verlag, September 2007.
21. J. Fieres, J. Schemmel, and K. Meier. Realizing biological spiking network models in a configurable wafer-scale hardware system. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2008.
22. J. Schemmel, J. Fieres, and K. Meier. Wafer-scale integration of analog neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2008.
23. P. Dayan and L. F. Abbott. Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems. The MIT press, Cambride, Massachusetts, 2001.
24. The Neural Simulation Technology (NEST) Initiative. Website. http://www.nest-initiative.org, 2008.
25. M.-O. Gewaltig and M. Diesmann. NEST (NEural Simulation Tool). Scholarpedia, 2 (4) : 1430, 2007.
26. E. B. Muller. Markov Process Models for Neural Ensembles with Spike-Frequency Adaptation. PhD thesis, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, 2006.
27. The Python Programming Language. Website. http://www.python.org, 2008.
28. PyNN mdash; a Python package for simulator-independent specification of neuronal network models. Website. http://www.neuralensemble.org/PyNN, 2008.
29. R. Brette and W. Gerstner. Adaptive exponential integrate-and-fire model as an effective description of neuronal activity. J. Neurophysiol., 94:3637-3642, 2005.