Interdisciplinary research: Framing and reframing

Area

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 385-394

  Oughton, Elizabeth ^a   Bracken, Louise ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Food; Interdisciplinarity; Rural development

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FOOD; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; RESEARCH WORK; RURAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 70449409191     PISSN: 00040894     EISSN: 14754762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00903.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Benford R, Snow D. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 2000, 26:611-39.
2. Bouwen R. Relational construction of meaning in emerging organizational contexts European. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 1998, 7:299-319.
3. Bouwen R, Craps M, Santos E. Multi-party collaboration: building generative knowledge and developing relationships among unequal partners in local community projects in Ecuador. Concepts and Transformation 1999, 4:133-51.
4. Bracken L J, Oughton E A. 'What do you mean?' The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 2006, 31:371-82.
5. Bruce A, Lyall C, Tait J, Williams R. Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme. Futures 2004, 36:457-70.
6. Dewulf A, Craps M, Dercon G. How issues get framed and reframed when different communities meet: a multi-level analysis of collaborative soil conservation initiative in the Ecuadorian Andes. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 2004, 14:177-92.
7. Dewulf A, Francois G, Pahl-Wostl C, Taillieu T. A framing approach to cross-disciplinary research collaboration: experiments from a large-scale research project on adaptive water management. Ecology and Society 2007, 12:14. http://www.ecologyandscoiety.org/vol112/iss2/art/, ) Accessed
8. Donaldson A, Heathwaite L, Lane S, Ward N, Whatmore S. Holistic approaches to understanding diffuse land management issues: a framework for interdisciplinary working Centre for Rural Economy. 2005, 1-14. Discussion Paper Series 2
9. Drake L E, Donohue W Q. Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution. Communication Research 1996, 23:297-322.
10. Eigenbrode S D, O'Rourke M, Althoff D M, Goldberg C S, Merrill K, Morse W, Nielsen-Pincus M, Stephens J, Winowiecki L, Wulfhorst J D, Bosque-Pérez N A. Employing philosophical dialogue in collaborative science. Bioscience 2007, 57:55-64.
11. Entman R M. Framing toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 1993, 43:51-8.
12. Fiss P C, Hirsch P M. The discourse of globalization: framing and sense making of an emerging concept. American Sociological Review 2005, 70:29-52.
13. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies 1994, Sage, London
14. Goffman E. Frame analysis 1974, Harper, New York
15. Gray B. Collaborating. Finding common ground for multiparty problems 1989, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco CA
16. Gray B, Donnellon A. An interactive theory of reframing in negotiation. 1990, Unpublished manuscript Pennsylvania State University College of Business Administration
17. Hadorn G H, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U. Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainable research. Ecological Economics 2006, 60:119-28.
18. Knorr Cetina K D. Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge 1999, Harvard University Press, Cambridge
19. Knorr Cetina K D. Culture in global knowledge societies: cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 2007, 32:361-75.
20. Lelé S, Norgaard R B. Practising interdisciplinary. BioScience 2005, 55:967-75.
21. Mansfield B, Haas J. Scale framing of scientific uncertainty in controversy over the endangered stellar sea lion. Environmental Politics 2006, 15:78-94.
22. Mostert E, Raadgever G T. Seven rules for researchers to increase their impact on the policy process. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2008, 12:1087-96.
23. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Rethinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty 2001, Polity Press, Oxford
24. Pahl-Wostl C. Towards sustainability in the water sector: the importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquatic Sciences 2002, 64:394-411.
25. Petts J, Owens S, Bulkeley H. Crossing boundaries: interdisciplinarity in the context of urban environments. Geoforum 2008, 39:593-601.
26. Snow D A, Rochford E B, Worden S K, Benford R D. Frame alignment processes, micro mobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 1986, 51:464-81.
27. Tress B, Tress G, Fry G. Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice. Landscape and Urban Planning 2005, 70:177-91.