MIT-skywalker

2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 542-549

  Bosecker, Caitlyn Joyce ^a   Krebs, Hermano Igo ^a,b,c  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL FACTORS; GAIT THERAPY; INDEPENDENT LIVING; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NEUROLOGICAL INJURY; NOVEL DEVICES; PROOF OF CONCEPT; ROBOTIC DEVICES; THERAPY PROGRAM;

PATIENT REHABILITATION; ROBOTS;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 70449371578     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2009.5209592     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. "Stroke Statistics" [Online] American Heart Association. Available: http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4725. Accessed December 2008.
2. th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. 2005;241-246.
3. "Spinal Cord Injury Facts and Statistics" [Online] SCI-Info Pages. Available: http://www.sci-info-pages.com/facts.html. Accessed December 2008.
4. Whittle M. Gait Analysis: An Introduction. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1996.
5. Riley P, Paolini G, Croce U, et al. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait and Posture. 2007;26:17-24.
6. Lee S, Hidler J. Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2008;104;747-755.
7. Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck J, Mondwurf C, et al. Gait analysis during treadmill and overground locomotion in children and adults. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology. 1009;105:490-497.
8. Matsas A, Taylor N, McBurney H. Knee joint kinematics from familiarized treadmill walking can be generalized to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects. Gait and Posture. 2000;11:46-53.
9. Nilsson L, Carlsson J, Danielsson A, et al. Walking training and patients with hemiparesis at an early state after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2001;15:515-527.
10. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke M, et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 1995;26:976-981.
11. Visintin M, Barbeu H, Korner-Bitensky N, et al. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke. 1998;29:1122-1128.
12. Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, et al. Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2002;33:553-558.
13. Lamontagne A, Fung J. Faster is better: implications for speed-intensive gait training after stroke. Stroke. 2004;35:2543-2548.
14. Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe, et al. Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (Deutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS). Clinical Rehabilitation. 2007;21:17-27.
15. Mehrholz, J., Werner, C., Kugler, J., Pohl, M., Electromechanical- assisted training for walking after stroke (Review), The Cochrane Collaboration, 2007, issue 4.
16. Hidler J, Wisman W, Neckel N. Kinematic trajectories while walking within the Lokomat robotic gait-orthosis. Clinical Biomechanics. 2008;23:1251-1259.
17. Jezernik S, Colombo G, Keller T, et al. Robotic orthosis Lokomat: a rehabilitation and research tool. Neuromodulation. 2003;6:108-115.
18. Mayr A, Kofler M, Quirbach E, et al. Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2007;21:307-314.
19. Hornby T, Campbell D, Kahn J, et al. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized control study. Stroke. 2008;39:1786-1792.
20. Hidler, J, Nichols, D, Pelliccio, M, et al. Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2009;23:5-13.
21. Collins S, Wisse M, Ruina A. A three-dimensional passive-dynamic walking robot with two legs and knees. The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2001;20:607-615.
22. Altshuller G. And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center, 2006.
23. Altshuller G. 40 Principles: TRIZ Keys to Technical Innovation. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center, 2005.
24. Wilson M, Qureshy H, Protas E, et al. Equipment specifications for supported treadmill ambulation training. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2000;37:415-422.
25. Krebs, H.I.; Hogan, N.; Aisen, M.L.; Volpe, B.T.; Robot-aided neurorehabilitation, IEEE - Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 1998, 6:1:75-87.
26. Krebs, H.I., Ferraro, M., Buerger, S.P., Newbery, M.J., Makiyama, A., Sandmann, M., Lynch, D., Volpe, B.T., Hogan, N.; Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2004, 1:5.
27. Masia, L, Krebs, HI, Cappa, P, Hogan, N. Design and characterization of hand module for whole-arm rehabilitation following stroke,-IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2007, 12:4:399-407.
28. Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Williams, D., Celestino, J., Charles, S.K., Lynch, D., Hogan, N. Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: A robot for wrist rehabilitation, IEEE Transaction Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 2007, 15(3)327-335.
29. Roy, A., Krebs, H.I., Williams, D., Bever, C.T., Forrester, L.W., Macko, R.M., Hogan, N., Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: a robot for ankle rehabilitation, IEEE - Transaction Robotics (accepted).
30. Norton R. Cam Design and Manufacturing Handbook. New York, NY: Industrial Press, Inc.; 2002.
31. Roberts, M. H., A robot for gait rehabilitation, MS Thesis MIT, 2004.
32. McGowan C, Neptune R, Kram R. Independent effects of weight and mass on plantar flexor activity during walking: implications for their contributions to body support and forward propulsion. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2008; 105:486-494.