Improving peptide identification with single-stage mass spectrum peaks

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 22, 2009, Pages 2969-2974

  He, Zengyou ^a   Yu, Weichuan ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; DATA MINING; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEOMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 70449371147     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp501     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bandeira,N. et al. (2008) Multi-spectra peptide sequencing and its applications to multistage mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics, 24, i416-i423.
2. Craig,R. and Beavis,R.C. (2004) Tandem: Matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics, 20, 1466-1467.
3. Dyer,J.S. et al. (1992) Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: The next ten years. Manage. Sci., 38, 645-654.
4. Eng,J.K. et al. (1994) An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 5, 976-989.
5. Frank,A. (2009) A ranking-based scoring function for peptide-spectrum matches. J. Proteome Res., 8, 2241-2252.
6. Jaitly,N. et al. (2009) Decon2LS: An open-source software package for automated processing and visualization of high resolution mass spectrometry data. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 87.
7. Kall,L. et al. (2007) Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods, 4, 923-925.
8. Keller,A. et al. (2002) Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem., 74, 5383-5392.
9. Klammer,A.A. et al. (2007) Improving tandem mass spectrum identification using peptide retention time prediction across diverse chromatography conditions. Anal. Chem., 79, 6111-6118.
10. Klammer,A.A. et al. (2008) Modeling peptide fragmentation with dynamic Bayesian networks for peptide identification. Bioinformatics 24, i348-i356.
11. Klimek,J. et al. (2008) The standard protein mix database: A diverse dataset to assist in the production of improved peptide and protein identification software tools. J. Proteome Res., 7, 96-103.
12. Lin,Y. et al. (2008) A fragmentation event model for peptide identification by mass spectrometry. In Vingron,M. and Wong,L. (eds) Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB 2008), Singapore, Vol. 4955 of LNBI. Springer, pp. 154-166.
13. Lu,B. et al. (2008) Improving protein identification sensitivity by combining MS and MS/MS information for shotgun proteomics using LTQ-Orbitrap high mass accuracy data. Anal. Chem., 80, 2018-2025.
14. MacCoss,M.J. et al. (2002) Probability-based validation of protein identifications using a modified SEQUEST algorithm. Anal. Chem., 74, 5593-5599.
15. Monroe,M.E. et al. (2007) VIPER: An advanced software package to support highthroughput LC-MS peptide identification. Bioinformatics 23, 2021-2023.
16. Nesvizhskii,A.I. et al. (2003) A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem., 75, 4646-4658.
17. Park,C.Y. et al. (2008) Rapid and accurate peptide identification from tandem mass spectra. J. Proteome Res., 7, 3022-3027.
18. Perkins,D.N. et al. (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 20, 3551-3567.
19. Ulintz,P.J. et al. (2008) Investigating MS2/MS3 matching statistics: A model for coupling consecutive stage mass spectrometry data for increased peptide identification confidence. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 7, 71-87.
20. Zeleny,M. (1982) Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, New York.