Optical pulsars and black arrows: Discoveries as occasioned productions

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 200-246

  Koschmann, Timothy ^a   Zemel, Alan ^b  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449359731     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508400902797966     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Arminen, I. (2008). Scientific and 'radical' ethnomethodology: From incompatible paradigms to ethnomethodological sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 38, 167-191.
2. Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (1977). Mock-ups and cock-ups: The stage-management of guided discovery instruction. In P. Woods & M. Hammersley (Eds.), School experience: Explorations in the sociology of education (pp. 87-108). London: Croon Helm.
3. Bittner, E. (1967). The police on skid-row: A study of peace keeping. American Sociological Review, 32, 699-715.
4. Center for the History of Physics. (2003). Moments of discovery: A pulsar discovery. Retrieved April 30, 2005, from www.aip.org/history/mod/pulsar/ pulsar1/01.html
5. Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cocke, W. J., Disney, M. J., & Taylor, D. J. (1969, February 8). Discovery of optical signals from Pulsar NP 0532. Nature, 221, 525-527.
7. Drew, P. (1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 129-151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dunbar, K. (1994). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. L. Sternberg & J.Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
10. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
11. Garfinkel, H. (Ed.). (1986). Ethnomethodological studies of work. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
13. Garfinkel, H., & Livingston, E. (2003). Phenomenal field properties of order in formatted queues and their neglected standing in the current situation of inquiry. Visual Studies, 18, 21-28.
14. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, D. (1981). The work of discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of Social Science, 11, 131-158.
15. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On the formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337-366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
16. Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370-404). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Goodwin, C. (2003). The body in action. In J. Coupland & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 111-142). New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
18. Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Heritage, J. (2005). Cognition in discourse. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 184-202). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hutchby, I. (2005). "Active listening": Formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counseling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 303-329.
21. Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Shenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219-248). New York: Academic Press.
22. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39-104.
23. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
24. Koshik, I. (2002). A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1851-1877.
25. Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
26. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Livingston, E. (1986). The ethnomethodological foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29. Livingston, E. (1987). Making sense of ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shoptalk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31. Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Lynch, M., & Macbeth, D. (1998). Demonstrating physics lessons. In J. G. Greeno & S. V. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 269-298). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. McDermott, R. (1976). Kids make sense: An ethnographic account of the interactional management of success and failure in one first-grade classroom. Unpublished dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
34. McDermott, R., Gospodinoff, K., & Aron, J. (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 245-275.
35. Mehan, H. (1979). What time is it, Denise? Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice, 18, 285-294.
36. Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43-72). New York: Academic Press.
37. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Rawls, A. W. (2002). Editor's introduction. In H. Garfinkel, Ethnomethology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism (pp. 1-64). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
39. Rawls, A. W. (2008). Editor's introduction. In H. Garfinkel, Toward a sociological theory of information (pp. 1-100). Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
40. Raymond, G. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone "so" in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37, 185-218.
41. Roschelle, J. (1991). Students'construction of qualitative physics knowledge: Learning about velocity and acceleration in a computer microworld. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
42. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235-276.
43. Sacks, H. (1963). Sociological description. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 8, 1-16.
44. Sacks, H. (1978). Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 249-270). New York: Academic Press.
45. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
46. Schegloff, E. (2006). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Star, S. L. (1985). Scientific work and uncertainty. Social Studies of Science, 15, 391-427.
48. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211-231). New York: Academic Press.
49. Sudnow, D. (2001). Ways of the hand: A rewritten account. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Terasaki, A. K. (2004). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 171-224). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
52. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Traweek, S. (1988). Beam times and life times: The world of particle physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Wieder, D. L. (1974). Language and social reality: The case of telling the convict code. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
55. Woolgar, S. (1976). Writing an intellectual history of scientific development: The use of discovery accounts. Social Studies of Science, 6, 395-422.