Demonstrating physics lessons

Thinking Practices in Mathematics and Science Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 269-298

  Lynch, Michael ^a   Macbeth, Douglas ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069994747     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (41)

1. Amerine, R, & Bilmes, J. (1988). Following instructions. Human Studies, 11, 327-339
2. Anderson, C. W., & Roth, K. J. (1989). Teaching for meaningful and self-regulated learning of science. Advances in Research on Teaching, 1, 265-309
3. Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (1977). Mock-ups and cock-ups: The stage-management of guided discovery instruction. In P. Woods (Ed.), School experience: Explorations in the sociology of education (pp. 87-108). New York: St. Martin's Press
4. Bjelic, D. (1992). The praxiological validity of natural scientific practices as a criterion for identifying their unique social-object character: The case of the 'authentication' of Goethe's morphological theorem. Qualitative Sociology, 15, 221-246
5. Bjelic, D., & Lynch, M. (1992). The work of a (scientific) demonstration: Respecifying Newton's and Goethe's theories of prismatic color. In G. Watson & R Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 52-78). London: Sage
6. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
7. Bogen, D., & Lynch, M. (1993). Do we need a general theory of social problems? In G. Miller & J. Holstein (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism (pp. 213-237). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter
8. Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relation to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53-62
9. Brickhouse, N. W. (1992, April). So what's the big idea? The role of theory on children's interpretation of evidence. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA
10. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42
11. Churchland, P. (1979). Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
12. Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London and Beverly Hills: Sage
13. Collins, H. M. (1988). Public experiments and displays of virtuosity: The core-set revisited. Social Studies of Science, 18, 725-748
14. Collins, H. M. (1992, August). Reproducing the past: Three methods for assembling a cultural inventory. Presented at the replication of historical experiments in physics, Oldenburg, Germany
15. Coulter, J., & Parsons, E. D. (1991). The praxiology of perception: Visual orientations and practical action. Inquiry, 33, 251-272
16. Duschl, R. A. (1985). Science education and philosophy of science: Twenty-five years of mutually exclusive development. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 541-555
17. Galison, P., & Stump, D. (Ed.). (1996). The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
18. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
19. Garfinkel, H. (1991). Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I)-an announcement of studies. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodologyand the human sciences (pp. 10-19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
20. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, I I, 131-158
21. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and development (pp. 337-366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
22. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row
23. Hawkins, J., & Pea, R D. (1987). Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 291-307
24. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (David Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press
25. Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86-100). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters
26. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press
27. Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, 6, 1-40
28. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
29. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press
30. Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. New York: Cambridge University Press
31. Macbeth, D. (1994). Classroom encounters with the unspeakable: 'Do you see, Danelle?' Discourse Processes, 17(2), 167-190
32. Macbeth, D. (1996). The discovery of situated worlds: Analytic commitments or moral orders? Human Studies, 19, 267-287
33. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
34. Morrison, K. (1981). Some properties of 'telling·rder designs' in didactic inquiry. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 245-262
35. Quine, W. V. O. (1980). Two dogmas of empiricism. Ch. 2 of Quine, From a logical point of view (pp. 20-46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
36. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361-382
37. Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
38. Smith, E. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1984). Plants as producers: A case study of elementary science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 21, 685-u98
39. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A., & Roschelle, J. (1971). Misconceptions reconceived. Unpublished manuscript, College of Education, Michigan State University Graduate School of Education, University of California Berkeley, Institute for Research on Learning
40. Sprung, 8., Froschl, M., & Campbell, P. B. (1985). What will happen if. young children and the scientific method. New York: Educational Equity Concepts, Inc
41. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell