Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 80-85

  Hamdan, Ahmad Mohammad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Esthetics; Ethnic norms; Soft tissues

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARAB; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CANAL; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ETHNOLOGY; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JORDAN; LIP; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; NORTH AMERICA; NOSE; ORBIT; SELLA TURCICA; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; ARABS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHIN; EAR CANAL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JORDAN; LIP; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; NORTH AMERICA; NOSE; ORBIT; SELLA TURCICA; SEX FACTORS; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 70449359686     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/010809-17.1     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: SS White Manufacturing; 1907.
2. Holdaway RA. Soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod. 1983; 84: 1-28.
3. Bearne DR, Sandy RJ, Shaw WC. Cephalometric soft tissue profile in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24: 277-284.
4. Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod. 1957; 27: 14-34.
5. Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1960; 46: 721-735.
6. Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod. 1966; 52: 804-822.
7. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 1967; 53: 262-284.
8. Sushner NI. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. Am J Orthod. 1977; 72: 373-385.
9. Holdaway RA. Soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Am J Orthod. 1984; 85 (pt 2) : 279-293.
10. Hwang H, Kim W, McNamara JA Jr. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72: 72-80.
11. Argyropolous E, Sassouni V. Comparison of dentofacial pattern for native Greek and American-Caucasian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 95: 238-249.
12. Drummond RA. A determination of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am J Orthod. 1968; 54: 670-682.
13. Fonseca RJ, Klein WD. A cephalometric evaluation of American Negro women. Am J Orthod. 1978; 73: 152-160.
14. Cotton WN, Takano WS, Wong W. The Downs analysis applied to three other ethnic groups. Angle Orthod. 1951; 21: 213-220.
15. Richardson RE. Racial differences in dimensional traits of the human face. Angle Orthod. 1980; 50: 301-311.
16. Kapila S. Selected cephalometric angular norms in Kikuyu children. Angle Orthod. 1989; 59: 139-144.
17. Jacobson A. The craniofacial pattern of the South African Negro. Am J Orthod. 1978; 73: 682-692.
18. Bacon W, Girardin P, Turlot JC. A comparison of cephalo-metric norms for the African Bantu and Caucasoid population. Eur J Orthod. 1983; 5: 233-240.
19. Yen PKJ. The facial configuration in a sample of Chinese boys. Angle Orthod. 1973; 43: 301-304.
20. Cooke MS, Wei SHY. Cephalometric 'standards' for the southern Chinese. Eur J Orthod. 1988; 10: 264-272.
21. Uesato G, Kinoshita Z, Kawamoto T, Koyama I, Nakanishi Y. Steiner cephalometric norms for Japanese and Japanese Americans. Am J Orthod. 1978; 73: 321-327.
22. Miyajima K, McNamara JA Jr, Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T. Craniofacial structures of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 110: 431-438.
23. Park IC, Bowman D, Klapper L. A cephalometric study of Korean adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 96: 54-59.
24. Nanda R, Nanda RS. Cephalometric study of the dentofacial complex of North Indians. Angle Orthod. 1969; 39: 22-28.
25. Shalbhoub SY, Sahran OA, Shaikh HS. Adult cephalometric norms for Saudi Arabians with a comparison of values for Saudi and North American Caucasians. Br J Orthod. 1987; 14: 273-279.
26. Swlerenga D, Oesterle LJ, Messersmith ML. Cephalometric values for adult Mexican-Americans. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop. 1994; 106: 146-155.
27. Cerci V, Martins JE, de Olivera MA. Cephalometric standards for white Brazilians. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1993; 8: 287-292.
28. Evanko AM, Freeman K, Cisneros GJ. Mesh diagram analysis: developing a norm for Puerto Rican Americans. Angle Orthod. 1997; 67: 381-388.
29. Hamdan AM, Rock WP. Cephalometric norms in an Arabic population. J Orthod. 2001; 28: 297-300.
30. Ebray EF, Caniklioglu CM. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or-thop. 2002; 121 (pt 2) : 65-72.
31. Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A. Determination of Holdaway soft tissue norms in Anatolian Turkish adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 395-400.
32. Hamdan AM, Rock WP, Hamdan MAM. Prevalence of mal-occlusion in 16 year old Jordanian school children. Egyp Dent Jl. 2001;47; 18: 89-93.
33. Hamdan AM. Orthodontic treatment need in Jordanian school children. Community Dental Health. 2001; 18: 177-180.
34. British Standard Institution. British Standards Glossary of Dental Terms. BS-4492. London, UK: BSI; 1983.
35. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
36. Ricketts RM. Cephalometric synthesis. Am J Orthod. 1960; 46: 647-673.
37. SPSS Release 12.0.1 for Windows 2003. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc.
38. Stirrups DR. Guidance on presentation of cephalometrybased research studies. A personal perspective. Br J Or-thod. 1993; 20: 359-365.
39. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurement. Am J Orthod. 1983; 83: 382-390.
40. Forsberg CM. Facial morphology and ageing: a longitudinal cephalometric investigation of young adults. Eur J Orthod. 1979; 1: 15-23.
41. Forsberg CM, Eliasson S, Westergren H. Face height and tooth eruption in adults-a 20-year follow-up investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1991; 13: 249-254.
42. Bondevik O. Growth changes in the cranial base and the face: a longitudinal cephalometric study of linear and angular changes in adult Norwegians. Eur J Orthod. 1995; 17: 525-532.
43. Iseri H, Solow B. Continued eruption of maxillary incisors and first molars in girls form 9 to 25 years, studied by the implant method. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18: 245-256.
44. Bishara SE, Fernandez AG. Cephalometric comparisons of the dentofacial relationships of two adolescent populations from Iowa and Northern Mexico. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88: 314-322.
45. Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125: 366-372.
46. Ebray EF, Caniklioglu CM, Ebray SK. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses. Am J Orthod Dentofa-cial Orthop. 2002; 121 (pt 1) : 57-64.
47. Johannsdottir B, Thordarson A, Magnusson TE. Craniofa-cial skelet al. and soft tissue morphology in Icelandic adults. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26: 254-250.
48. Alcalde RE, Jinno T, Orsini MG, Sasaki A, Sugiyama RM, Matsumura T. Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118: 84-89.