Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 121, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 57-64

  Erbay, Elif F ^a   Caniklioǧlu, Cem M ^a   Erbay, Şevket K ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADULTHOOD; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTISTRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIP; LOWER LIP; MALE; NEGRO; NORMAL HUMAN; NOSE; RACE DIFFERENCE; RANK SUM TEST; SKELETON; SKULL RADIOGRAPHY; SOFT TISSUE; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); UPPER LIP; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL CARE; ESTHETICS; ETHNIC GROUP; HISTOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; REFERENCE VALUE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ADULT; BEAUTY; CEPHALOMETRY; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIP; MALE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REFERENCE VALUES; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TURKEY;

EID: 0036363617     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.119780     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Angle EH. Treatment of the malocclusion of the teeth. Philadelphia: SS White Manufacturing; 1907.
2. Hambleton RS. The soft-tissue covering of the skeletal face as related to orthodontic problems. Am J Orthod 1964;50:405-20.
3. Stoner MM. A photometric analysis of the facial profile. Am J Orthod 1955;41:453-69.
4. Neger M. A quantitative method for the evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile. Am J Orthod 1959;45:738-51.
5. Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 1968;54:272-89.
6. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970;57:132-44.
7. Peck S, Peck H. The aesthetically pleasing face: An orthodontic myth. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1971;47:175-84.
8. Powell SJ, Rayson RK. The profile in facial aesthetics. Br J Orthod 1976;3:207-15.
9. Janzen EK. A balanced smile-a most important treatment objective. Am J Orthod 1977;72:359-72.
10. Park YC, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue profile - fallacies of hard-tissue standards in treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90:52-62.
11. Thomas H. Research on predictability in cephalometry of the relationship of chin symphysis and nose-chin balance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:110-9.
12. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The gingival smile line. Angle Orthod 1992;62:91-100.
13. Lundström A, Forsberg CM, Peck S, McWilliam J. A proportional analysis of soft tissue facial profile in young adults with normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1992;62:127-33.
14. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:299-312.
15. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:395-411.
16. Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:180-7.
17. Mackley RJ. An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1993;63:183-90.
18. Steiner CC. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960;46:721-35.
19. Ricketts RM. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 1957;27:14-37.
20. Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53:262-84.
21. Sushner NI. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. Am J Orthod 1977;72:373-85.
22. Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983;84:1-28.
23. Merrifield LL. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1966;52:804-22.
24. Downs WB. Variations in facial relationship: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948;34:812-40.
25. Suh C-H. Roentgenographic cephalometric study on the teeth and skull. J Korean Modern Med 1967;6:515-27.
26. Drummond RA. A determination of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am J Orthod 1968;54:670-82.
27. Altemus LA. Cephalofacial relationships. Angle Orthod 1968; 38:175-84.
28. Nanda R, Nanda RS. Cephalometric study of the dentofacial complex of North Indians. Angle Orthod 1969;39:22-8.
29. Chan GK-H. A cephalometric appraisal of the Chinese (Cantonese). Am J Orthod 1975;61:279-81.
30. Garcia CJ. Cephalometric evaluation of Mexican Americans using the Downs and Steiner analysis. Am J Orthod 1975;68:67-74.
31. Mitani S. A roentgenocephalometric study of seventeen-years old Japanese using several analyses [thesis]. Chicago: Loyola University; 1980.
32. Shalhoub SY, Sarhan OA, Shaikh HS. Adult cephalometric norms for Saudi Arabians with a comparison of values for Saudi and North American Caucasians. Br J Orthod 1987;14:273-9.
33. Cooke MS, Wei SHY. Cephalometric standards for the southern Chinese. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:264-72.
34. Park IC, Bowman D, Klapper L. A cephalometric study of Korean adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:54-9.
35. Yuen SWH, Hiranaka DK. A photographic study of the facial profiles of southern Chinese adolescents. Quintessence Int 1989; 20:665-76.
36. Riedel RR. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 1952;22:142-5.
37. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: Allen and Unwin; 1940.
38. Oliver BM. The influence of lip thickness and strain on upper lip response to incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 1982;82:141-9.
39. McNamara JA Jr, Brust EW, Riolo ML. Soft tissue evaluation of individuals with an ideal occlusion and a well-balanced face. In: McNamara JA, editor. Esthetics and the treatment of facial form. Craniofacial Growth Series, Volume 28. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1993. p. 115-46.
40. Burstone CJ. The integumental profile. Am J Orthod 1958;44:1-25.
41. Subtenly JD. A longitudinal study of soft tissue facial structure and their profile characteristics, defined in relation to underlying skeletal structure. Am J Orthod 1959;45:481-507.
42. Bowker WD, Meredith HV. A metric analysis of the facial profile. Angle Orthod 1959;29:149-60.
43. Tulley WJ, Campbell AC. A manual of practical orthodontics. Bristol: John Wright; 1970.
44. Cox NH, van der Linden FPGM. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod 1971;60:175-83.
45. Garner LD. Soft tissue changes concurrent with orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1974;66:481-507.
46. Rudee DA. Proportional profile changes concurrent with orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod 1954;50:421-41.
47. Riedel RA. An analysis of dentofacial relationships. Am J Orthod 1957;43:103-19.
48. Hershey HG. Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in post adolescent female patients. Am J Orthod 1972; 61:45-54.
49. Wisth PJ. Changes of the soft tissue profile during growth. Trans Eur Orthod 1972;48:123-32.
50. Barnelt DP. Variations in the soft tissue profile and their relevance to clinical assessment of skeletal pattern. Br J Orthod 1975;2:235-8.
51. Mauchamp D, Sassouni V. Growth and prediction of skeletal and soft tissue profile. Am J Orthod 1978;64:83-94.