Life Habits and Prosthetic Profile of Persons With Lower-Limb Amputation During Rehabilitation and at 3-Month Follow-Up

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 90, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1953-1959

  Zidarov, Diana ^a,b   Swaine, Bonnie ^a,b,c   Gauthier Gagnon, Christiane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal   (Canada)

^c Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Amputation; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HABIT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; LIMB AMPUTATION; LIMB PROSTHESIS; LOCOMOTION; MALE; REHABILITATION CARE; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; DEMOGRAPHY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LEG; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 70449344641     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Fougeyrollas P., Noreau L., Bergeron H., Cloutier R., Dion S.A., and St-Michel G. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res 21 (1998) 127-141
2. Treweek S.P., and Condie M.E. Three measures of functional outcome for lower limb amputees: a retrospective review. Prosthet Orth Int 22 (1998) 178-185
3. O'Toole D.M., Goldberg R.T., and Ryan B. Functional changes in vascular amputee patients: evaluation by Barthel Index, PULSES profile and ESCROW scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66 (1985) 508-511
4. Panesar B.S., Morrison P., and Hunter J. A comparison of three measures of progress in early lower limb amputee rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 15 (2001) 157-171
5. Muecke L., Shekar S., Dwyer D., Israel E., and Flynn J.P. Functional screening of lower-limb amputees: a role in predicting rehabilitation outcome?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73 (1992) 851-858
6. Leung E.C., Rush P.J., and Devlin M. Predicting prosthetic rehabilitation outcome in lower limb amputee patients with the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 (1996) 605-608
7. Dodds T.A., Martin D.P., Stolov W.C., and Deyo R.A. A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993) 531-536
8. Holbrook M.E., and Skilbeck C.E. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing 12 (1983) 166-170
9. Datta D., Ariyaratnam R., and Hilton S. Timed walking test-an all embracing outcome for measure for lower limb amputees?. Clin Rehabil 10 (1996) 227-232
10. Miller W.C., and Deathe A.B. Measurement properties of the Frenchay Activities Index among individuals with a lower limb amputation. Clin Rehabil 18 (2004) 414-422
11. Noreau L., Fougeyrollas P., and Vincent C. The LIFE-H: assessment of the quality of social participation. Technol Disabil 14 (2002) 113-118
12. Zidarov D., Swaine B., and Gauthier-Gagnon C. Quality of life of persons with lower limb amputation during rehabilitation and at 3 month follow up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90 (2009) 634-645
13. Grisé M.C., Gauthier-Gagnon C., and Martineau G.G. Prosthetic profile of people with lower extremity amputation: conception and design of a follow-up questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993) 862-870
14. Gauthier-Gagnon C., and Grisé M.C. Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 (1994) 1309-1314
15. Gauthier-Gagnon C., and Grisé M.C. Tools to measure outcome of people with a lower limb amputation: update on the PPA and LCI. Proceedings of the outcome measures in lower limb prosthetics (2005), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Chicago 61-67
16. Pell J.P., Donnan P.T., Fowkes F.G., and Ruckley C.V. Quality of life following lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Surg 7 (1993) 448-451
17. Nissen S.J., and Newman W.P. Factors influencing reintegration to normal living after amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73 (1992) 548-551
18. Hammel J., Magasi S., Heinemann A., Whiteneck G., Bogner J., and Rodriguez E. What does participation mean?. an insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 30 (2007) 1-16
19. Rochette A., Korner-Bitensky N., and Levasseur M. Optimal participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 28 (2006) 1231-1235
20. Gauthier-Gagnon C., Grisé M.C., and Potvin D. Predisposing factors related to prosthetic use by people with a transtibial and transfemoral amputation. J Prosthet Orthot 10 (1998) 99-109
21. Gauthier-Gagnon C., Grisé M.C., and Potvin D. Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 (1999) 706-713
22. Pernot H.F., De Witte L.P., Lindeman E., and Cluitmans J. Daily functioning of the lower extremity amputee: an overview of the literature. Clin Rehabil 11 (1997) 93-106
23. Kent R., and Fyfe N. Effectiveness of rehabilitation following amputation. Clin Rehabil 13 Suppl 1 (1999) 43-50
24. Geertzen J.H., Martina J.D., and Rietman H.S. Lower limb amputation part 2: rehabilitation-a 10 year literature review. Prosthet Orth Int 25 (2001) 14-20
25. Streppel K.R., De Vries J., and Van Harten W.H. Functional status and prosthesis use in amputees, measured with the prosthetic profile of the amputee (PPA) and the short version of the sickness impact profile (SIP68). Int J Rehabil Res 24 (2001) 251-256