Social dominance and neosexism: Relationship with attitudes towards affirmative action programs;Dominancia social y neosexismo: Relación con las actitudes hacia programas de acción afirmativa

Revista de Psicologia Social

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 275-285

  Montes Berges, Beatriz ^a   Silván Ferrero, Ma del Prado ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JAÉN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Actitudes hacia los programas de acci n afirmativa; Attitudes towards affirmative action programs; Collective interests; Dominancia social; Intereses colectivos; Neosexism; Neosexismo; Social dominance

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449338362     PISSN: 02134748     EISSN: 15793680     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/0213474041960487     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. EXPOSITO, F., MOYA, M. C. & GLICK, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medicion y correlatos. Revista depsicologta Social, 13 (2), 159-169.
2. GAERTNER, S. L. & DOVIDIO, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. En J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego: Academic Press.
3. GLICK, P., LAMEIRAS, M. & CASTRO, Y. (2002). Education and catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles 47, 9-10, 433-441.
4. GLICK, P., FISKE, S. T., MLADANIC, A., SAIZ, J., ABRAMS, D., MASSER, B., ADETOUN, B., OSAGIE, J., AKANDE, A., ALAO, A., BRUNNER, A., WILLEMSEN, T. M., CHIPETA, K., DARDENNE, B., DIJKSTERHUIS, A., WIGBOLDUS, D., ECKES, T., SIX-MATERNA, I., EXPOSITO, F., MOYA, M., FODDY, M., KIM, H. J., LAMEIRAS, M., SOTELO, M. J., MUCHI-FAINA, A., ROMANI, M., SAKALLI, N., UDEGBE, B., YAMAMOTO, M., UI, M., FERREIRA, M. C. & LOPEZ, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
5. GLICK, P. & FISKE, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
6. KINDER, D. R. & SEARS, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414-481.
7. JOST, J. T. & BANAJI, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false-consciousness. British Journal of SocialPschology, 33, 1-27.
8. MCCONAHAY, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence and the modern racism scale. En J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice and discrimination: Theory and research, (pp. 91-126). Orlando: Academic Press.
9. MONTES BERGES, B. (2002). Discrimination de genero en situaciones de competition y cooperation con priming subliminal. Tesis doctoral no publicada. Universidad de Granada.
10. MONTES BERGES, B. & SILVAN FERRERO, M. P. (2002). Amenazapercibida hacia los homosexuales en relation con el poder. Estudio experimental realizado en la Universidad de Granada.
11. MONTES BERGES, B. & SILVAN FERRERO, M. P. (2003)., Puede explicar la teoria de la dominancia social la discriminacion de genero en Espana? Encuentros en Psicologla Social, 1 (1), 176-179.
12. MOYA, M. C. & EXPOSITO, F. (2001). Nuevas formas, viejos intereses: Neosexismo en varones espanoles. Psicothema, 13 (4), 643-649
13. PRATTO, F., JAMES, L. H. J., IEVIN, S., SIDANIUS, J., SHIH, M. & BACHRACH, H. (2000). Social Dominance Orientation and the legitimation of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 31 (3), 369-409.
14. PRATTO, F., SIDANIUS, J., STALLWORTH, L. M. & MALLE, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (4), 741-763.
15. SEARS, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. En P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53-84). Nueva York: Plenum Press.
16. SIDANIUS, J. (1993). The interface between racism and sexism. Journal of Psychology, 127 (3), 311-322.
17. SIDANIUS, J., LEVIN, S., RABINOWITZ, J. L. & FEDERICO, C. M. (1999). Peering into the jaws of the beast. The integrative dynamics of social identity, symbolic racism, and social dominance. En D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 80-132). Nueva York: Russell Sage.
18. SIDANIUS, J. & PRATTO, F. (1993). The dynamics of social dominance and the inevitability of oppression. En P. Snyderman & P. E. Tetlock (Eds.), Prejudice, politics and race in America today (pp. 173-211). Stanford: Stanford.
19. SIDANIUS, J., PRATTO, F. & BOBO, L. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance?. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 67 (6), 998-1011.
20. TAJFEL, H. & TURNER, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. En S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall University Press.
21. TAJFEL, H. & TURNER, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
22. TOUGAS, F., BROWN, R., BEATON, A. M. & JOLY, S. (1995). Neosexism: plus ga change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (8), 842-849.
23. VAN HIEL, A. & MERVIELDE, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: a comparisosn of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1-13.