Modeling tumor cell population dynamics based on molecular adhesion assumptions

Journal of Biological Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 273-288

  Grygierzec, Wieslaw ^a,b   Deutsch, Andreas ^a   Schubert, Walter ^c,d   Friedenberger, Manuela ^c   Philipsen, Lars ^d  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE IN KRAKOW   (Poland)

^c OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d MelTeec GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cell interaction; Cellular automaton (CA); Combinatorial protein patterns (CPP); Mathematical modeling; Molecular adhesion; Population dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 7044274708     PISSN: 02183390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S021833900400118X     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chen A, Moy VT, Cross-linking of cell surface receptors enhances cooperativity of molecular adhesion, Biophys. J. 78(6):2814-2820, 2000.
2. Bussemaker HJ, Analysis of pattern-forming lattice-gas automaton: Mean-field theory and beyond, Phys. Review E 53(2):1644-1661, 1996.
3. Deutsch A, Dormann S, Cellular Automata Modelling of Biological Pattern Formation, Birkhauser, Boston, in press.
4. Galbraith CG, Sheetz MP, Forces on adhesive contacts affect cell function, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:566-571, 1998.
5. Hato T, Pampori N, Shattil SJ, Complementary roles for receptor clustering and conformational change in the adhesive and signaling functions of integrin alphaIIb beta3, J. Cell Biol. 141:1685-1695, 1998.
6. Helm CA, Knoll W, Israelachvili JN, Measurement of ligand-receptor interactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88:8169-8173.
7. Hinterdorfer P, Baumgartner W, Gruber HJ, Schilcher K, Schindler H, Detection and localization of individual antibody-antigen recognition events by atomic force microscopy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:3477-3481, 1996.
8. Evans E, Ritchie K, Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds, Biophys. J. 72:1541-1555, 1997.
9. Irvine IJ, Hue KA, Mayes AM, Griffith LG, Simulations of cell-surface integrin binding to nanoscale-clustered adhesion ligands, Biophys. J. 82:120-132, 2002.
10. Merkel R, Nassoy P, Leung A, Ritchie K, Evans E, Energy landscapes of receptor-ligand bonds explored with force spectroscopy, Nature 397:50-53, 1999.
11. Metropolis NA, Rosenbluth AW, Teller AH, Equation of state calculation by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1092, 1953.
12. Piper JW, Swerlick RA, Zhu C, Determining force dependence of two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding affinity by centrifugation, Biophys. J. 74:492-513, 1998.
13. Schubert W, Topological proteomics, toponomics, MELK-technology, in Hecker M, Müllner S (eds.), Proteomics of Microorganismus: Fundamental Aspects and Application, Advanced Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, in press.
14. Schubert W, Antigenic determinants of T lymphocyte a/b receptor and other leukocyte surface proteins as differential markers of skeletal muscle regeneration: Detection of spatially and timely restricted patterns by MAM microscopy, Eur. J. Cell Biol. 58:395-410, 1992.
15. Schubert W, Polymositis, topological proteomics technology and paradigm for cell invasion dynamics, J. Theoret. Med. 75-84, 2002.
16. Turner CE, Burridge K, Transmembrane molecular assemblies in cell-extracellular matrix interactions, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 3(5):849-853, 1991.
17. Turner S, Sherratt JA, Intercellular adhesion and cancer invasion: A discrete simulation using the extended Potts model, J. Theor. Biol. 216:85-100, 2002.
18. Ward MD, Dembo M, Hammer DA, Kinetics of cell detachment: Peeling of discrete receptor clusters, Biophys. J. 67:2522-2534, 1994.