A normative and intentional agent model for organisation modelling

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2577, Issue , 2003, Pages 39-52

  Filipe, Joaquim ^a  

^a INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO DE SETÚBAL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

AGENT MODEL; DEONTIC; INTENTIONAL AGENTS; MODEL COMPONENTS; ORGANISATIONAL KNOWLEDGE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SOFTWARE AGENTS;

AXIOLOGIC COMPONENTS; EPISTEMIC COMPONENTS; ORGANIZATION MODELING; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 7044245592     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-39173-8_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Antunes, L. and H. Coelho, 1999. Rationalising decisions using multiple values, Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science, Siena, Italy.
2. Antunes, L. and H. Coelho, 1999. Decisions based upon multiple values: the BVG agent architecture. Proceedings of the Portuguese AI Conference EPIA99, Springer-Verlag LNAI (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence) no1695, pp. 297-311, vora, Portugal.
3. Belnap, N., 1991. Backwards and Forwards in the Modal Logic of Agency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 51.
4. Castelfranchi, C., 1993. Commitments: from Individual Intentions to Groups and Organisations. In Working Notes of AAAI93 Workshop on AI and Theory of Groups and Organisations: Conceptual and Empirical Research, pp.35-41.
5. C. Castelfranchi, F. Dignum, C. Jonker and J. Treur, 1999. Deliberate Normative Agents: Principles and Architectures. InN. Jennings and Y. Lesperance (eds.) Proceedings of ATAL-99, Orlando, USA.
6. Cohen, P. and H. Levesque, 1990. Intention is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42:213-261.
7. Conte, R., and C. Castelfranchi, 1995. Cognitive and Social Action, UCL Press, London.
8. Dignum, F., J-J Ch. Meyer and R.Wieringa, 1994.A Dynamic Logic for Reasoning About Sub-Ideal States. InJ.Breuker (Ed.), ECAI Workshop on Artificial Normative Reasoning, pp.79-92, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
9. F. Dignum, D. Morley, E. Sonenberg, and L. Cavendon. Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents. InProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, ICMAS-2000, Boston, USA.
10. Filipe, J., 2000. Normative Organisational Modelling using Intelligent Multi- Agent Systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Staffordshire, UK.
11. Hilpinen, R., 1971. Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
12. Rao, A. and M. Georgeff, 1991. Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI architecture. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Nebel, Rich, and Swartout, Eds.) pp.439-449. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, USA.
13. Shoham, Y., 1993. Agent-Oriented Programming. Artificial Intelligence, 60, pp.51-92, Elsevier Science Publishers.
14. Stamper, R., 1996. Signs, Information, Norms and Systems. InHolmqvist et al. (Eds.), Signs of Work, Semiosis and Information Processing in Organizations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.
15. th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
16. Singh, M., 1996. Multiagent Systems as Spheres of Commitment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS) - Workshop on Norms, Obligations and Conventions. Kyoto, Japan.
17. Werner, E., 1989. Cooperating Agents: A Unified Theory of Communication and Social Structure. InGasser and Huhns (Eds.), Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp.3-36, Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, USA.
18. von Wright, G., 1951. Deontic Logic. Mind, 60, pp.1-15.