On requesting conference papers electronically

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 475-479

  Hartley, James ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conference papers; Document delivery; Electronic mail; Grey literature; Informal communication; Requests; Response rate; Scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT; ELECTRONIC MAIL; ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SCIENCE; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CONFERENCE PAPERS; DOCUMENT DELIVERY; GREY LITERATURE; INFORMAL COMMUNICATION; RESPONSE RATE;

CONFERENCE CALLS;

EID: 7044239694     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551504047826     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. J. Hartley, On requesting reprints electronically, Journal of Information Science 30(3) (2004) 280-284.
2. N. Lin, W.D. Garvey and C.E. Nelson, A study of the communication structure of science. In: C.E. Nelson and D.K. Pollock (eds), Communication Among Scientists and Engineers (D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA, 1970).
3. A.J. Meadows, Communicating Research (Academic Press, San Diego, 1998).
4. A.S. Relman, News reports of medical meetings: How reliable are the abstracts? New England Journal of Medicine 303(5) (1980) 277-278.
5. P.H. Franses, From first submission to citation: An empirical analysis, Statistica Neerlandica 56(5) (2002) 497-510.
6. B.M. Rienzi and M.J. Allen, Poster presenters: Send us your papers, American Psychologist 49(7) (1994) 681-682.
7. D.K. Mooney, Requests for convention manuscripts: On-site versus letter response rates, American Psychologist 50(8) (1995) 727-728.
8. J. Hartley, Designing instructional and informational text, In: D.H. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology (2nd edit.) (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2004).
9. J. Hartley, Learning and Studying: A Research Perspective (Routledge, London, 1998).
10. J. Hartley, M.J.A. Howe and W.J. McKeachie, Writing through time: Longitudinal studies of the effects of new technology on writing, British Journal of Educational Technology 32(2) (2001) 141-151.
11. J. Hartley, Improving copies of that conference paper, paper available from the author.
12. P.K. Murphy, J.F. Long, T.A. Holleran and E. Esterly, Persuasion online or on paper: A new take on an old issue. Learning and Instruction 13(5) (2003) 511-532.
13. V. Alberani and P.D. Pietrangeli, Grey literature in information science: production, circulation and use, Inspel 29(4) (1995) 240-249.
14. R. Cordes, Is grey literature ever used? Using citation analysis to measure the impact of GESAMP, an international marine scientific advisory board, Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 28(1) (2004) 49-69.
15. L.B. Seng and P. Willett, The citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools, Journal of Information Science 21(1) (1995) 68-71.
16. N.L. Pelzer and W.H. Wiese, Bibliometric study of grey literature in core veterinary medical journals, Journal of the Medical Library Association 9(4) (2003) 434-41.
17. British Psychological Society, Presenting a paper at a BPS conference (British Psychological Society, 48 Princess Road East, Leicester, LE1 7DR, UK, undated).
18. G. Edirisooriya, Research presentation in a democratic society: A voice from the audience, Educational Researcher, August-September (1996) 25-30.
19. J. Nisbet, Presenting a conference paper, Research Intelligence: British Educational Research Association Newsletter, No. 87 (May, 2004) 12-14.
20. S. Wineburg, Must it be this way? Ten rules for keeping your audience awake during conferences, Educational Researcher 33(4) (2004) 13-14.