Receptor models for air quality management

EM: Air and Waste Management Association's Magazine for Environmental Managers

Volumn , Issue OCT., 2004, Pages 15-24

  Watson, John G ^a   Chow, Judith C ^a  

^a DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT; NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS (NAAQS); PRECURSORS; TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICLES (TSP);

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MEASUREMENT THEORY; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; REDUCTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REMEDIATION; SOILS; SOLVENTS; TOXIC MATERIALS; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

AIR QUALITY;

EID: 7044228198     PISSN: 10889981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Brook, J.R.; Vega, E.; Watson, J.G. Chapter 7: Receptor Methods. In Particulate Matter Science for Policy-Makers, A NARSTO Assessment, Part 2; NARSTO: Pasco, WA, 2003; pp. 7-1-7-48.
2. Chow, J.C. A Composite Modeling Approach to Assess Air Pollution Source/Receptor Relationships. Sc.D. Dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1985.
3. 10 Apportionment for Fossil Fuel Combustion and Other Sources by the Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model; Energy Fuels 2002, 16 (2), 222-260.
4. Cooper, J.A.; Watson, J.G. Receptor-Oriented Methods of All Particulate Source Apportionment; J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1980, 30 (10), 1116-1125.
5. Gordon, G.E. Receptor Models; Environ, Sci. Technol. 1980, 14, 792-800.
6. Gordon, G.E. Receptor Models; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1988, 22 (10), 1132-1142.
7. Gordon, G.E.; Pierson, W.R.; Daisey, J.M.; Lioy, P.J; Cooper, J.A.; Watson, J.G.; Cass, G.R. Considerations for Design of Source Apportionment Studies; Atmos. Environ. 1984, 18 (8), 1567-1582.
8. Henry, R.C.; Lewis, C.W.; Hopke, P.K.; Willlamson, B.J. Review of Receptor Model Fundamentals; Atmos. Environ. 1984, 18 (8), 1507-1515.
9. Henry, R.C. History and Fundamentals of Multivariate Air Quality Receptor Models; Chemom. Intell. Lab. Sys. 1997, 37 (1), 37-42.
10. Henry, R.C. Multivariate Receptor Models - Current Practice and Future Trends; Chemom. Intell. Lab. Sys. 2002, 60 (1-2), 43-48.
11. Hopke, P.K. Receptor Modeling In Environmental Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 1985.
12. Hopke, P.K. Receptor Modeling for Air Quality Management; Hopke, P.K., Ed.; Elsevier Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991.
13. Hopke, P.K. An Introduction to Source Receptor Modeling. In Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles; Landsberger, S., Creatchman, M., Eds.; Gordon and Breach Science: Amsterdam, 1999; pp. 273-315.
14. Hopke, P.K. Recent Developments in Receptor Modeling; J. Chemom. 2003, 17 (5), 255-265.
15. Hopke, P.K.; Dattner, S.L. Receptor Models Applied to Contemporary Pollution Problems; Air Pollution Control Association: Pittsburgh, PA, 1982.
16. Javitz, H.S.; Watson, J.G. Feasibility Study of Receptor Modeling for Apportioning Utility Contributions to Air Constituents, Deposition Quality, and Light Extinction. Prepared for Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, by SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1988.
17. Javitz, H.S.; Watson, J.G.; Guertin, J.P.; Mueller, P.K. Results of a Receptor Modeling Feasibility Study; J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1988, 38 (5), 661-667.
18. Transactions, Receptor Methods for Source Apportionment: Real-World Issues and Applications; Pace, T.G., Ed.; Air Pollution Control Association: Pittsburgh, PA, 1986.
19. Watson, J.G. Chemical Element Balance Receptor Model Methodology for Assessing the Sources of Fine and Total Suspended Particulate Matter in Portland, Oregon. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon Graduate Center, Beaverton, OR, 1979.
20. Watson, J.G. Overview of Receptor Model Principles; J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1984, 34 (6), 619-623.
21. Watson, J.G.; Henry, R.C.; Cooper, J.A.; Macias, E.S. The State of the Art of Receptor Models Relating Ambient Suspended Particulate Matter to Sources. In Atmospheric Aerosol: Source/Air Quality Relationships; Macias, E.S., Hopke, P.K., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1981; pp. 89-106.
22. Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Mathal, C.V. Receptor Models in Air Resources Management: A Summary of the APCA International Specialty Conference; J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1989, 39 (4), 419-426.
23. Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C.; Fujita, E.M. Review of Volatile Organic Compound Source Apportionment by Chemical Mass Balance; Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35 (9), 1567-1584.
24. Watson, J.G.; Zhu, T.; Chow, J.C.; Engelbrecht, J.P.; Fujita, E.M.; Wilson, W.E. Receptor Modeling Application Framework for Particle Source Apportionment; Chemosphere 2002, 49 (9), 1093-1136.
25. Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C. Particulate Pattern Recognition. In Introduction to Environmental Forensics; Murphy, B.L., Morrison, R., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, 2002; pp. 429-460.
26. Ashbaugh, L.L. A Statistical Trajectory Technique for Determining Air Pollution Source Regions; J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1983, 33(11), 1096-1098.
27. Ansari, A.S.; Pandis, S.N. Response of Inorganic PM to Precursor Concentrations; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32 (18), 2706-2714.
28. 2 Point Source; Atmos. Environ. 1985, 19 (6), 917-924.
29. Hopke, P.K.; Gladney, E.S.; Gorden, G.E.; Zoller, W.H.; Jones, A.G. The Use of Multivariate Analysis to Identify Sources of Selected Elements in Boston Urban Aerosol; Atmos. Environ. 1976, 10, 1015-1025.
30. Gao, N.; Cheng, M.D.; Hopke, P.K. Receptor Modeling of Airborne Ionic Species Collected in SCAQS, 1987; Atmos. Environ. 1994, 28 (8), 1447-1470.
31. Hies, T.; Treffeisen, R.; Sebald, L.; Reimer, E. Spectral Analysis of Air Pollutants, Part 1: Elemental Carbon Time Series; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34 (21), 3495-3502.
32. Lioy, P.J.; Mallon, R.P.; Lippmann, M; Kneip, T.J.; Samson, P.J. Factors Affecting the Variability of Summertime Sulfate in a Rural Area Using Principal Component Analysis; J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1982, 32 (10), 1043-1047.
33. Mueller, P.K.; Hidy, G.M.; Baskett, R.L.; Fung, K.K.; Henry, R.C.; Lavery, T.F.; Nordi, N.J.; Lloyd, A.C.; Thrasher, J.W.; Warren, K.K.; Watson, J.G. Sulfate Regional Experiment (SURE): Report of Findings; Report No. EA-1901; Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, 1983.
34. Gatz, D.F.; Stensland, G.J.; Miller, M.V.; Leslie, A.C.D. Sources of Airborne Calcium in Rural Central Illinois. In Atmospheric Aerosol: Source/Air Quality Relationships; Macias, E.S., Hopke, P.K., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1981; pp. 303-325.
35. Rogge, W.F.; Hildemann, L.M.; Mazurek, M.A.; Cass, G.R.; Simoneit, B.R.T. Mathematical Modeling of Atmospheric Fine Particle-Associated Primary Organic Compound Concentrations; J. Geophys. Res. 1996, 101, 19379-19394.
36. Watson, J.G.; Fujita, E.M.; Chow, J.C.; Zielinska, B.; Richards, L.W.; Neff, W.D.; Dietrich, D. Northern Front Range Air Quality Study: Final Report. Prepared for Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, 1998; available at http://charon.cira.colostate.edu/DRIFinal/ZipFiles/.
37. Watson, J.G.; Chow, J.C. Estimating Middle-, Neighborhood-, and Urban-Scale Contributions to Elemental Carbon in Mexico City with a Rapid Response Aethalometer; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51 (11), 1522-1528.
38. Blanchard, C.L.; Roth, P.M.; Tanenbaum, S.J.; Ziman, S.D.; Seinfeld, J.H. The Use of Ambient Measurements to Identify Which Precursor Species Limit Aerosol Nitrate Formation; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50 (12), 2073-2084.
39. 2.5 in the Mt. Zirkel Wilderness; Energy Fuels 2002, 16 (2), 311-324.
40. Henry, R.C.; Spiegelman, C.H.; Collins, J.F.; Park, E.S. Reported Emissions of Organic Gases Are Not Consistent with Observations; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 6596-6599.
41. Mendoza-Dominguez, A.; Russell, A.G. Iterative Inverse Modeling and Direct Sensitivity Analysis of a Photochemical Air Duality Model; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34 (23), 4974-4981.
42. Malm, W.C.; Schichtel, B.A.; Ames, R.B.; Gebhart, K.A. A 10-Year Spatial and Temporal Trend of Sulfate Across the United States; J. Geophys. Res. 2002, 107 (D22), ACH 11-1-ACH 11-20; doi:10.1029/2002JD002107.
43. Godleski, J.J.; Verrier, R.L.; Koutrakis, P.; Catalano, P. Mechanisms of Morbidity and Mortality from Exposure to Ambient Air Particles; Report No. 91; Health Effects Institute (HEI), Cambridge, MA, 2000.
44. Chow, J.C.; Bachmann, J.D.; Wierman, S.S.G.; Mathai, C.V.; Malm, W.C.; White, W.H.; Mueller, P.K.; Kumar, N.; Watson, J.G. 2002 Critical Review Discussion - Visibility: Science and regulation; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2002, 52 (9), 973-999.
45. Pitchford, M.L.; Green, M.C.; Kuhns, H.D.; Tombach, I.H.; Malm, W.C.; Scruggs, M.; Farber, R.J.; Mirabella, V.A.; White, W.H.; McDade, C.; Watson, J.G.; Koracin, D.; Hoffer, T.E.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Vimont, J.C., et al. Project MOHAVE, Final Report; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, San Francisco, CA, 1999; available at http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/mohave/report.html.
46. Watson, J.G. Visibility: Science and Regulation; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2002, 52 (6), 628-713.
47. Watson, J.G. Visibility: Science and Regulation - A Summary of the 2002 Critical Review; EM 2002, June, 36-43.
48. Motelay-Massei, A.; Ollivon, D.; Garban, B.; Chevreuil, M. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Bulk Deposition at a Suburban Site: Assessment by Principle Component Analysis of the Influence of Meteorological Parameters; Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37 (22), 3135-3146.
49. Anttila, P.; Paatero, P.; Tapper, U.; Järvinen, O. Application of Positive Matrix Factorization to Source Apportionment: Results of a Study of Bulk Deposition Chemistry in Finland; Atmos. Environ. 1994, 29, 1705-1718.
50. Pena-Mendez, E.M.; Astorga-Espana, M.S.; Garca-Montelongo, F.J. Chemical Fingerprinting Applied to the Evaluation of Marine Oil Pollution in the Coasts of Canary Islands (Spain); Environ. Poll. 2001, 111 (2), 177-187.
51. Stout, S.A.; Uhler, A.D.; McCarthy, K.J. A Strategy and Methodology for Defensibly Correlating Spilled Oil to Source Candidates; Environ. Forensics 2001, 2 (1), 87-98.
52. Murphy, B.L. Allocation by Contribution to Cost and Risk at Superfund Sites; Environ. Forensics 2000, 1 (3), 117-120.
53. Sims, R.C.; Sims, J.L. Chemical Mass Balance Approach to Field-Evaluation of Bioremediation; Environ. Prog. 1995, 14 (1), F2-F3.
54. 2.5 and Regional Haze; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2001; available at http://vistas-sesarm.org/tech/draftpm.pdf.
55. Seinfeld, J.H.; Pandis, S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1998.
56. Pun, B.K.; Seigneur, C. Understanding Particulate Matter Formation in the California San Joaquin Valley: Conceptual Model and Data Needs; Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33 (29), 4865-4875.
57. 10Air Quality Study (CRPAQS). Prepared for California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, 1999; available at http://sparc2.baaqmd.gov/centralca/publications.htm.
58. 2.5 Episode at the Fresno, CA, Supersite; Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36 (3), 465-475.
59. Chow, J.C. Critical Review: Measurement Methods to Determine Compliance with Ambient Air Quality Standards for Suspended Particles; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1995, 45 (5), 320-382.
60. Landsberger, S.; Creatchman, M. Elemental Analysis of Airborne Particles; Landsberger, S., Creatchman, M., Eds.; Gordon and Breach: Newark, NJ, 1999.
61. Air Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric Contaminants, 9th Edition; Cohen, B.S., McCammon, C.S.J., Eds.; American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: Cincinnati, OH, 2001.
62. Baron, P.A.; Willeke, K. Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, 2nd Edition; Baron, P.A., Willeke, K., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2001.
63. Zielinska, B.; Fujita, E.M. Organic Gas Sampling. In Environmental Sampling for Trace Analysis; Markert, B., Ed.; VCH Publishers: New York, 1994; pp. 163-184.
64. McMurry, P.H. A Review of Atmospheric Aerosol Measurements; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34 (12-14), 1959-1999.
65. Middlebrook, A.M.; Murphy, D.M.; Lee, S.H.; Thompson, D.S.; Prather, K.A.; Wenzel, R.J.; Liu, D.Y.; Phares, D.J.; Rhoads, K.P.; Wexler, A.S.; Johnston, M.V.; Jimenez, J.L.; Jayne, J.T.; Worsnop, D.R.; Yourshaw, I.; Seinfeld, J.H.; Flagan, R.C. A Comparison of Particle Mass Spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project; J. Geophys. Res. 2003, 108 (D7), SOS 12-1-SOS 12-13.
66. Wang, J.L.; Chang, C.J.; Chang, W.D.; Chew, C.; Chen, S.W. Construction and Evaluation of Automated Gas Chromatography for the Measurement of Anthropogenic Halocarbons in the Atmosphere; J. Chromatogr. 1999, 844, 259-269.
67. 2.5 Monitoring Networks; Report No. EPA-454/R-98-012. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, 1998; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pmpolgud.html.
68. Yamamoto, N.; Fujii, M.; Endo, O.; Kumagai, K.; Yanagisawa, Y. Broad Range Observation of Particle Deposition on Greased and Non-Greased Impaction Surfaces Using a Line-Sensing Optical Microscope; J. Aerosol Sci. 2002, 33 (12), 1667-1679.
69. Henry, R.C. Dealing with Near Collinearity in Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Models; Atmos. Environ. 1992, 26A (5), 933-938.
70. 2.5 and VOCs; Report No. 1808.2D1. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, 1998.
71. Ashbaugh, L.L.; Carvacho, O.F.; Brown, M.S.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Magliano, K.L. Soil Sample Collection and Analysis for the Fugitive Dust Characterization Study; Atmos. Environ. 1998, 37 (9-10), 1163-1173; doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01022-1.
72. 10 Chemical Source Profiles for Geological Dust from the San Joaquin Valley, California; Atmos. Environ. 1998, 37 (9-10), 1317-1340; doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01021-X.
73. Method 202 - Determination of Condensible Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Technical Support Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1996; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/promgate/m-202.pdf.
74. 10 Emissions (Constant Sampling Rate Procedure); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Technical Support Division, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1997; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/promgate/m-201a.pdf.
75. 2.5 Emission Profiles for Stationary Sources: Comparison of Traditional and Dilution Sampling Techniques; Fuel Process. Technol. 2000, 65, 177-188.
76. PAMS Information; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2001; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/pams.html.
77. Malm, W.C.; Pitchford, M.L.; Scruggs, M.; Sisler, J.F.; Ames, R.G.; Copeland, S.; Gebhart, K.A.; Day, D.E. Spatial and Seasonal Patterns and Temporal Variability of Haze and Its Constituents in the United States: Report III; Report No. ISSN: 0737-5352-47; Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, 2000; available at http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/IMPROVE/Publications/improve-reports.htm.
78. Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Pritchett, L.C.; Pierson, W.R.; Frazier, C.A.; Purcell, R.G. The DRI Thermal/Optical Reflectance Carbon Analysis System: Description, Evaluation, and Applications in U.S. Air Quality Studies; Atmos. Environ. 1993, 27A (8), 1185-1201.
79. Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Crow, D.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Merrifield, T. Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements; Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2001, 34 (1), 23-34.
80. 2.5 Carbonate Concentrations at Regionally Representative Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment Sites; J. Geophys. Res. 2002, 107 (D21), ICC 6-1-ICC 6-9; doi: 10.1029/2001JD000574.
81. Demerjian, K.L. A Review of National Monitoring Networks in North America; Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34 (12-14), 1861-1884.
82. Chow, J.C.; Engelbrecht, J.P.; Watson, J.G.; Wilson, W.E.; Frank, N.H.; Zhu, T. Designing Monitoring Networks to Represent Outdoor Human Exposure; Chemosphere 2002, 49 (9), 961-978.
83. National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy (Second Draft); U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2002; available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/monitorstrat/compms.pdf.
84. Malm, W.C.; Schichtel, B.A.; Pitchford, M.L.; Ashbaugh, L.L.; Eldred, R.A. Spatial and Monthly Trends in Speciated Fine Particle Concentration in the United States; J. Geophys. Res. 2004, (D03306); doi: 10.1029/2003JD003739.
85. Pinto, J.P.; Stevens, R.K.; Willis, R.D.; Kellogg, R.B.; Mamane, Y.; Novak, J.; Santroch, J.; Benes, I.; Lenicek, J.; Bures, V. Czech Air Quality Monitoring and Receptor Modeling Study; Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32 (7), 843-854.
86. 10 Concentrations from the Qalabotjha Low-Smoke Fuels Macro-Scale Experiment in South Africa; Environ. Monitor. Assess. 2001, 69 (1), 1-15.
87. Chen, W.C.; Wang, C.S.; Wei, C.C. An Assessment of Source Contributions to Ambient Aerosols in Central Taiwan; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47 (4), 501-509.
88. Vega, E.; García, I.; Apam, D.; Ruíz, M.E.; Barbiaux, M. Application of a Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model to Respirable Particulate Matter in Mexico City; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47 (4), 524-529.
89. 2.5; AES/AQRB-PERD-04; Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2000.
90. Engelbrecht, J.P.; Swanepoel, L.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Egami, R.T. The Comparison of Source Contributions from Residential Coal and Low-Smoke Fuels, Using CMB Modeling, in South Africa; Environ. Sci. Policy 2002, 5 (2), 157-67.
91. Chiang, P.C. Development of Receptor Models for Ambient Aerosols in the Northern and Central Regions of Taiwan; Taiwan EPA 82-E3F1-09-01; Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency, Taipel, Taiwan, 1993.
92. 10 and Sulfate Aerosol at McMurdo Station, Antarctica; Chemosphere 2001, 45 (3), 347-56.
93. 2.5 Particles in the Sihwa Area, Korea; J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2001, 51 (3), 393-405.
94. Planning, Rules, and Area Sources - 2003 Draft Air Quality Management Plan; South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD/AQMP), Diamond Bar, CA, 2003.
95. Hidy, G.M.; Friedlander, S.K. The Nature of the Los Angeles Aerosol; Englund, H.M., Beery, W.T., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1971; pp. 391-404.
96. Kleinman, M.T.; Pasternack, B.S.; Eisenbud, M.; Kneip, T.J. Identifying and Estimating the Relative Importance of Sources of Airborne Particulates; Enivron. Sci. Technol. 1980, 14 (1), 62-65.
97. Dams, R. et al. Quantitative Relationships Among Trace Elements Over Industrialized N.W. Indiana; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 1971; pp. 139-145.
98. Henry, R.C. Multlvariate Receptor Modeling by N-Dimenslonal Edge Detection; Chemom. Intell. Lab. Sys. 2003, 65 (2), 179-189; doi:10.1016S0169-7439(02)00108-9.
99. Paatero, P. Least Squares Formulation of Robust Non-Negative Factor. Analysis; Chemom. Intell. Lab. Sys. 1997, 37, 23-25.