Expanding innovation system and policy an organisational perspective

Policy Studies

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 533-553

  Ramstad, Elise ^a  

^a Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation   (Finland)

Author keywords

Innovation infrastructure; Innovation policy; Innovation system; Organisational innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350757615     PISSN: 01442872     EISSN: 14701006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01442870903208551     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alasoini, T., et al., 2006. European programmes on work and labour innovation a benchmarking approach. Helsinki: WORK-IN-NET.
2. Appelbaum, S.H. and Steed, A.J., 2005. The critical success factors in the client-consulting relationship. Journal of management development, 24, 68-93.
3. Arnold, E. and Kuhlman, S., 2001. RCN in the Norwegian research and innovation system. Background Report No. 12 in the Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway. Oslo: Royal Norwegian Ministry for Education, Research and Church Affairs.
4. Brodner, P. and Latniak, E., 2003. Sources of innovation and competitiveness: national programmes supporting the development of work organisation. Concepts and transformation, 8 (2), 179-211.
5. Commission of the European Communities, 2006. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions. Putting knowledge into practice: a broad-based innovation strategy for the EU. Brussels.
6. Den Hertog, J.F. and Schroder, P., 1989. Social research for technological change: lessons from national programmes in Europe and North America. Maastricht, The Netherlands: University of Limburg, MERIT.
7. European Innovation Scoreboard, 2006. Comparative analysis of innovation performance, 2006. Pro Inno Europe Inno Metrics. Available from: www.proinno-europe.eu/doc/EIS2006_final.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2009].
8. Freeman, C. and Louçã, F., 2001. As time goes by: from the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Fricke, W., 2003. Thirty years of work life programmes in Germany. Concepts and transformation, 8 (1), 43-68.
10. Huselid, M., 1995. The impact of human resource management on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of management journal, 38, 635-660.
11. Kotilainen, H., 2005. Best practices in innovation policies. Tekes Technology Review 177. Helsinki: Tekes.
12. Kuhlmann, S., 2003. Evaluation of research and innovation policies: a discussion of trends with examples from Germany. International journal of technology management, 26 (2-4), 131-149.
13. Kuhlmann, S. and Heinze, T., 2007. Analysis of heterogeneous collaboration in the German research system with a focus on nanotechnology. In: D. Jansen, ed. New forms of governance in research organizations. From disciplinary theories towards interfaces and integration. Heidelberg: Springer, 190-209.
14. Ministry of Education and Research, 2008. Universities and university colleges. Oslo.
15. National Innovation Strategy, 2008. Available from: http://www.innovaatiostrategia.fi/ [Accessed 19 March 2009].
16. National Science Board, 2008. Science and engineering indicators 2008. Volume 1. Arlington: National Science Foundation.
17. National Workplace Strategy, 2005. NCPP. Available from: http://www.ncpp.ie/inside.asp?catid=284&zoneId=3 [Accessed 21 April 2009].
18. OECD, 2003. Steering and funding of research institutions. Country report: Germany. Bonn: OECD.
19. Powell, W.W., et al., 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative science quarterly, 41 (1), 26-68.
20. Ramstad, E., 2005. Simultaneous improvement in performance and the quality of working life through developing the work organization. In: T. Alasoini, E. Ramstad and N. Rouhiainen, eds. The Finnish Workplace Development Programme as an expanding activity results, challenges, opportunities. Helsinki: Tykes, 110-135.
21. Ramstad, E., 2008a. Innovation generating model simultaneous development of work organization and knowledge infrastructure. Experimenting in the field of organizational development. Helsinki: Tekes.
22. Ramstad, E., 2008b. Collaborative knowledge creation model in the field of organizational development. Educational action research, 16 (2), 261-277.
23. Ramstad, E., 2009. Promoting performance and the quality of working life simultaneously. International journal of productivity and performance management, 58 (5), 423-456.
24. Ramstad, E. and Saarenpaa, V., 2008. R&D maps of experts in the field of organizational innovation. Available from: http://rdmaps.ath.cx [Accessed 19 March 2009].
25. The Research Council of Norway, 2007. Regional R&D and innovation 2007 2017 VRI. Oslo.
26. Sanidas, E., 2005. Organizational innovations and economic growth: organosis and growth of firms, sectors and countries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
27. Shapira, P., Klein, H., and Kuhlmann, S., 2001. Innovations in European and US innovation policy. Research policy, 30 (6), 869-872.
28. Smits, R. and Kuhlmann, S., 2004. The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. The international journal of foresight and innovation policy, 1 (1/2), 4-32.
29. Tether, B.S. and Tajar, A., 2008. The organizational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms. Research policy, 37, 720-739.
30. Thoresen, T.-J. and Paulsen, T., 2004. Country review of national research program: Norway. Vision Era-Net. Available from: http://www.visioneranet.org/files/97/Norway-review.pdf [Accessed 4 September 2009].