Moving beyond concentrations: The challenge of limiting temperature change

Human-Induced Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Assessment

Volumn 9780521866033, Issue , 2007, Pages 387-402

  Richels, Richard G ^a   Manne, Alan S ^b   Wigley, Tom M L ^c  

^a ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b National Center for Atmospheric Research ^*

^c NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION; CHAINS; CLIMATE CHANGE; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES;

ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATION; ATMOSPHERIC GREENHOUSE; GAS CONCENTRATION; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; LIMITING TEMPERATURE; MARGIN OF SAFETY; RADIATIVE FORCINGS; TEMPERATURE CHANGES;

ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE;

EID: 70350745380     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511619472.037     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Caldeira, K., Jain, A. K. and Hoffert, M. I. (2003). Climate sensitivity uncertainty and the need for energy without CO2 emission. Science,299, 2052-2054.
2. Clark, L. and Weyant, J. (2002). Modeling Induced Technical Change: An Overview. Working Paper. Stanford University.
3. Conference of the Parties (1997). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Report of the Conference of the Parties, Third Session, Kyoto, 1-10 December, FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1.
4. Edmonds, J. and Wise, M. (1999). Exploring a technology strategy for stabilizing atmospheric CO2. In International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Forest, C.E., Stone, P.H., Sokolov, A.P., Allen, M.R. and Webster, M. (2002). Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science295, 113-117.
6. Hoffert, M.I., Caldeira, K., Benford, G. et al. (2002). Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: Energy for a greenhouse planet. Science,298, 981-987.
7. IPCC (1994). Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emissions Scenarios. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. J. T. Houghton, L. G. Meira Filho, J. Bruce et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. IPCC (1996). Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. J. P. Bruce, H. Lee, E. F. Haites. et al. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
9. IPCC (2000). Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. N. Nakicenovic and R. Swart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. IPCC (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assesment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, et al. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
11. Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G. (1994). The costs of stabilizing global CO2 emissions: A probabilistic analysis based on expert judgments. Energy Journal15(1), 31-56.
12. Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G. (1995). The greenhouse debate: Economic efficiency, burden sharing and hedging strategies. The Energy Journal,16(4), 1-38.
13. Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G. (1997). On stabilizing CO2 concentrations: Cost-effective emission reductions strategies. Environmental Modeling and Assessment,2(4), 251-265.
14. Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G. (2001). An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases. Nature410, 675-677.
15. Moss, R. H. and Schneider, S.H. (2000). Uncertainties in the IPCC Third Assessment Report: Recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting. In Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, ed. R. Pachauri, K. Tanaka and T. Taniguchi. Geneva: IPCC, pp. 33-51.
16. Nakicenovic, N., Grubler, A. and McDonald, A. (1998). Global Energy Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Reilly, J., Prinn, R., Harnisch, J. et al. (1999). Multigas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol. Nature401, 549-555.
18. Runci, P., Clarke, L. and Dooley, J. (2005). Energy R&D Investment in the Industrialized World: Historic and Future Directions. Working Paper PNNL-SA-47701. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
19. Schmalensee, R. (1993). Comparing greenhouse gases for policy purposes. The Energy Journal,14(1), 245-255.
20. Schneider, S.H. and Goulder, L. (1997). Achieving low-cost emission targets. Nature389, 13-14.
21. Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (EMF-21) (2005). Multi-gas Mitigation and Climate Control, January 31, 2005, Washington, DC. www.stanford.edu/group/EMF/
22. Wigley, T.M.L. and Raper, S.C.B. (1992). Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios. Nature357, 293-300.
23. Wigley, T.M.L. and Raper, S.C.B. (2001). Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming. Science293, 451-454.
24. Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B. (2002). Reasons for larger warming projections in the IPCC Third Assessment Report. Journal of Climate15, 2945-2952.
25. Wigley, T.M.L., Richels, R. and Edmonds, J. A. (1996). Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Nature379, 240-243.