Developmental competence of embryos derived from reciprocal in Vitro fertilization between yak (Bos grunniens) and cattle (Bos taurus)

Journal of Reproduction and Development

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 480-483

  Zi, Xiang Dong ^a   Yin, Rong Hua ^a   Chen, Shao Wei ^a   Liang, Guan Nan ^a   Zhang, Da Wei ^a   Guo, Chun Hua ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY FOR NATIONALITIES   (China)

Author keywords

Cattle; Early development; Embryos; In vitro fertilization (IVF); Yak

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLASTOMERE; BREEDING; CATTLE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BLASTOMERES; CATTLE; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PREGNANCY, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

BOS; BOS GRUNNIENS; BOS TAURUS;

EID: 70350741287     PISSN: 09168818     EISSN: 13484400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.20202     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wiener G, Han JL, Long RJ. The Yak. Bangkok: The Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2003.
2. Zi XD, Zhong GH, Wen YL, Zhong JC, Liu CL, Ni YA, Yezi YH, Ashi MG. Growth performance, carcass composition and meat quality of Jiulong-Yak (Bos grunniens). Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 2004; 17: 410-414.
3. Cai L. The research on the interspecific cross combination between female yak and Bos taurus bull. In: Liu XM (ed.), The Research on the Utilization and Exploitation of Grassland in the Northwestern Part of Sichuan Province. Chengdu: National Publish- ing House of Sichuan; 1984: 107-113 (In Chinese).
4. Katzina EV, Davydov VN, Baldanov ND. Elaboration of the scheme of production and usage of industrial hybrids of yak and meat cattle. In: Proc 1st Int Cong on Yak; Lanzhou, China, 1994: 44-48.
5. Zi XD, He SM, Lu H, Feng JA, Lu JY, Chang S, Wang X. Induction of estrus in suck- led female yaks (Bos grunniens) and synchronization of ovulation in the non-sucklers for timed artificial insemination using progesterone treatments and Co-Synch regi- mens. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 92: 183-192.
6. Hwang WS, Jo CH, Lee BC, Shin TY, Kim KS, Roh SH, Kim SK, Chun BC, Lee KN, Shin OI, Yim HS. Successful calving following transfer of bovine embryos produced by in vitro fertilization in Korea. J Reprod Dev 1995; 41: 175-179.
7. Suzuki C, Iwamura S, Yoshioka K. Birth of piglets through the non-surgical transfer of blastocysts produced in vitro. J Reprod Dev 2004; 50: 487-491.
8. Cognié Y, Baril YG, Poulin N, Mermillod P. Current status of embryo technologies in sheep and goat. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 171-188.
9. McHugh JA, Rutledge JJ. Heterologous fertilization to characterize spermatozoa of the genus Bos. Theriogenology 1998; 50: 185-193.
10. Xu ZB. Early embryonic development of crossbreeding between yak and cattle in vitro. M.Sc. Dissertation. Lanzhou: Institute of Anim Vet Pharmacol Sci 2006 (In Chi- nese).
11. Zi XD, Lu H, Yin RH, Chen SW. Development of embryos after in vitro fertilization of bovine oocytes with sperm from either yaks (Bos grunniens) or cattle (Bos taurus). Anim Reprod Sci 2008; 108: 208-215.
12. Tervit HR, Whittingham DG, Rowson LEA. Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J Reprod Fertil 1972; 30: 493-497.
13. Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, Critser ES, Eyestone WH, First NL. Bovine in vitro fertil- ization with frozen-thawed semen. Theriogenology 1986; 25: 591-600.
14. Ikeda S, Azuma T, Hashimoto S, Yamada M. In vitro maturation of bovine oocytes with fractions of bovine follicular fluid separated by heparin affinity chromatography. J Reprod Dev 1999; 45: 397-404.
15. Zhang M, Lu KH, Seidel JGE. Development of bovine embryos after in vitro fertiliza- tion of oocytes with flow cytometrically sorted, stained and unsorted sperm from dif- ferent bulls. Theriogenology 2003; 60: 1657-1663.
16. Kouba AJ, Atkinson MW, Gandolf AR, Roth TL. Species-specific sperm-egg interac- tion affects the utility of a heterologous bovine in vitro fertilization system for evaluat- ing antelope sperm. Biol Reprod 2001; 65: 1246-1251.
17. Yu SJ, Huang YM, Chen BX. Reproductive patterns of the yak. I. Reproductive phe- nomena of the female yak. Br Vet J 1993; 149: 579-583.
18. Zi XD. Reproduction in female yaks (Bos grunniens) and opportunities for improve- ment. Theriogenology 2003; 59: 1303-1312.
19. Roth TL, Weiss RB, Buff JL, Bush LM, Wildt DE, Bush M. Heterologous in vitro fer- tilization and sperm capacitation in an endangered African antelope, the Scimitar- horned oryx (Oryx dammah). Biol Reprod 1998; 58: 475-482.
20. Roth TL, Bush LM, Wildt DE, Weiss RB. Scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah) sper- matozoa are functionally competent in a heterologous bovine in vitro fertilization sys- tem after cryopreservation on dry ice, in a dry shipper, or over liquid nitrogen vapor. Biol Reprod 1999; 60: 493-498.
21. Revel F, Mermillod P, Peynot N, Renard JP, Heyman Y. Low developmental capacity of in vitro matured and fertilized oocytes from calves compared with that of cows. J Reprod Fertil 1995; 103: 115-120.
22. Rocha A, Randel RD, Broussard JR, Lim JM, Blair RM, Roussel JD, Godke RA, Hansel W. High environmental temperature and humidity decrease oocyte quality in Bos taurus but not in Bos indicus cows. Theriogenology 1998; 49: 657-665.
23. de Wit AAC, Wurth YA, Kruip ThAM. Effect of ovarian phase and follicle quality on morphology and developmental capacity of the bovine cumulus-oocyte complex. J Anim Sci 2000: 78: 1277-1283.
24. Ward F, Rizos D, Corridan D, Quinn K, Boland M, Lonergan P. Paternal influence on time of first embryonic cleavage post insemination and the implications for subse- quent bovine embryo development in vitro and fertility in vivo. Mol Reprod Dev 2001; 60: 47-55.
25. Camargo LSA, Viana JHM, Ramos AA, Serapiao RV, de Sa WF, Ferreira AM, Guimaraes MFM, do Vale Filho VR. Developmental competence and expression of the Hsp 70.1 gene in oocytes obtained from Bos indicus and Bos taurus dairy cows in a tropical environment. Theriogenology 2007; 68: 626-632.
26. Oliveira-Filho EB, Catt J, Garcia JM, Esper CR. "In vitro" fertilization in zebu cattle (Bos indicus): Some peculiarities affecting early development. Proc 4th World Cong On Genet Applied to Livest Prod 1994; 12, 1330-1332.
27. Fischer AE, Bernal DP, Gutierrez-Robayo C, Rutledge JJ. Estimates of heterosis for in vitro embryo production using reciprocal crosses in cattle. Theriogenology 2000; 54: 1433-1442.
28. Irgang R, Scheid IR, Wentz I, Favero JA. Ovulation rate, embryo number and uterus length in purebred and crossbred Duroc, Landrace, and Large White gilts. Livestock Prod Sci 1993; 33: 253-266.
29. Armas RD, Solano R, Riego E, Pupo CA, Aguilar A, Ramos B, Aguirre A, Fuente JDL, Castro FO. Use of F1 progeny of Holstein × Zebu cross cattle as oocyte donors for in vitro embryo production and gene microinjection. Theriogenology 1994; 42: 977-985.
30. Hamano S, Koikeda A. Developmental capacity of F1 hybrid embryos produced by in vitro fertilization between different breeds Japanese beef cattle. J Reprod Dev 1995; 41: 149-152.
31. Boediono A, Suzuki T, Godke RA. Comparison of hybrid and purebred in vitroderived cattle embryos during in vitro culture. Anim Reprod Sci 2003; 78: 1-11.
32. Anderson GB. Interspecific pregnancy: barriers and prospects. Biol Reprod 1998; 38: 1-15.