The maintenance of mixed mating by cleistogamy in the perennial violet Viola septemloba (Violaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2074-2079

  Winn, Alice A ^a   Moriuchi, Ken S ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fruit set; Mating system evolution; Seasonal environmental variation; Seed germination in the field; Viola septemloba; Violaceae

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FLOWER; FRUIT SET; GERMINATION; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INBREEDING; PERENNIAL PLANT; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PHYTOMASS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEASONAL VARIATION; SEED PRODUCTION;

VIOLA SEPTEMLOBA; VIOLACEAE;

EID: 70350712222     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900048     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barrett, S. C. H., and C. G. Eckert. 1990. Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. In S. Kawano [ed.], Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants, 229-254. Academic Press, Tokyo, Japan.
2. Campbell, C. S. 1982. Cleistogamy in Andropogon L. (Gramineae). American Journal of Botany 69: 1625-1635.
3. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18: 237-268.
4. Culley, T. M., and M. R. Klooster. 2007. The cleistogamous breeding system: A review of its frequency, evolution, and ecology in angiosperms. Botanical Review 73: 1-30.
5. Goodwillie, C., S. Kalisz, and C. G. Eckert. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: Occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 36: 47-79.
6. Harder, L. D., S. A. Richards, and M. B. Routley. 2008. Effects of reproductive compensation, gamete discounting and reproductive assurance on mating system diversity in hermaphrodites. Evolution 62: 157-172.
7. Holsinger, K. E. 1991. Mass-action models of plant mating systems: The evolutionary stability of mixed mating systems. American Naturalist 138: 602-622.
8. Johnston, M. O. 1998. Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: Pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations. Genetica 102/103: 267-278.
9. Kalisz, S., and D. W. Vogler. 2003. Benefits of autogamous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments. Ecology 84: 2928-2942.
10. Kimura, M., T. Maruyama, and J. F. Crow. 1963. The mutation load in small populations. Genetics 48: 1303-1312.
11. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
12. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. American Naturalist 113: 67-79.
13. Lloyd, D. G. 1992 Self-and cross-fertilization in plants II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 370-380.
14. Lu, Y. Q. 2002. Why is cleistogamy a selected reproductive strategy in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae)? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75: 543-553.
15. Masuda, M., T. Yahara, and M. Maki. 2001. An ESS model for the mixed production of cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers in a facultative cleistogamous plant. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3: 429-439.
16. Masuda, M., T. Yahara, and M. Maki. 2004. Evolution of a floral dimorphism in a cleistogamous annual, Impatiens noli-tangere L. occurring under different environmental conditions. Ecological Research 19: 571-580.
17. McKinney, L. E., and N. H. Russell. 2002. Violaceae of the southeastern United States. Castanea 64: 369-379.
18. Oakley, C. G., K. S. Moriuchi, and A. A. Winn. 2007. The maintenance of outcrossing in predominantly selfing species: Ideas and evidence from cleistogamous species. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 38: 437-457.
19. Oakley, C. G., and A. A. Winn. 2008. Population-level and family-level inbreeding depression in a cleistogamous perennial. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 523-530.
20. Porcher, E., and R. Lande. 2005. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression under pollen discounting and pollen limitation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 497-508.
21. Schemske, D. W. 1978. Evolution of reproductive characteristics in Impatiens (Balsaminaceae): Significance of cleistogamy and chasmogamy. Ecology 59: 596-613.
22. Schemske, D. W., and R. Lande. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41-52.
23. Schmitt, J., and S. E. Gamble. 1990. The effect of distance from the parental site on offspring performance and inbreeding depression of Impatiens capensis: A test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Evolution 44: 2022-2030.
24. Schoen, D. J., and D. G. Lloyd. 1984. The selection of cleistogamy and heteromorphic diaspores. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23: 303-322.
25. Stewart, S. C. 1994. Genetic constraints on mating system evolution in the cleistogamous annual Impatiens pallida: Inbreeding in chasmogamous flowers. Heredity 73: 265-274.
26. Sun, M. 1999. Cleistogamy in Scutellaria indica (Labiatae): Effective mating system and population genetic structure. Molecular Ecology 8: 1285-1295.