Towards interoperability in tracking systems: An ontology-based approach

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5601 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2009, Pages 496-505

  Gómez Romero, Juan ^a   Patricio, Miguel A ^a   García, Jesús ^a   Molina, José M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA FUSION TECHNIQUE; HETEROGENEOUS COMPONENT; MULTIAGENT FRAMEWORK; MULTICAMERA VISION SYSTEM; ONTOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY-BASED; OWL ONTOLOGIES; SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATION; SYSTEM INTEROPERABILITY; TRACKING DATA; TRACKING SYSTEM; VIDEO SEQUENCES; VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS; VISION SYSTEMS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; CAMERAS; INTEROPERABILITY; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SECURITY SYSTEMS; VIDEO RECORDING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 70350701865     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02264-7_51     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Yilmaz, A., Javed, O., Shah, M.: Object tracking: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 38(4), 13 (2006)
2. Patricio, M.A., Castanedo, F., Berlange, A., Ṕerez, O., Garćia, J., Molina, J.M.: Computational Intelligence in Visual Sensor Networks: Improving Video Processing Systems. In: Computational Intelligence in Multimedia Processing: Recent Advances, pp. 351-377. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
3. Steinberg, A.N., Bowman, C.L., White, F.E.: Revisions to the JDL data fusion model. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3719, pp. 430-441. SPIE (1999)
4. Steinberg, A.N., Bowman, C.L.: Revisions to the JDL data fusion model. In: Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion, pp. 45-67. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)
5. Patricio, M.A., Carb́o, J., Ṕerez, O., Garćia, J., Molina, J.M.: Multi-agent framework in visual sensor networks. Journal of Applied Signal Processing (1), 226-247 (2007)
6. Horrocks, I.: Ontologies and the Semantic Web. Communications of the ACM 51(12), 58-67 (2008)
7. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199-220 (1993)
8. Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J., Benjamins, V.: What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Int. Systems and Their Applications 14(1), 20-26 (1999)
9. Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Description Logics. In: Handbook of Knowledge Representation, pp. 135-180. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)
10. McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
11. Bao, J., Kendall, E.F., McGuinness, D.L., Wallace, E.K.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Quick reference guide (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2- quick-reference/
12. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Lamersdorf, W.: Jadex: A BDI-Agent System Combining Middleware and Reasoning. In: Software Agent-Based Applications, Platforms and Development Kits, pp. 143-168. Birkhäuser, Basel (2005)
13. Hendler, J.: Agents and the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 30-37 (2001)
14. Schiemann, B., Schreiber, U.: OWL-DL as a FIPA-ACL content language. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Formal Ontology for Communicating Agents, Malaga, Spain (2006)
15. Arndt, R., Troncy, R., Staab, S., Hardman, L., Vacura, M.: COMM: designing a Well-Founded multimedia ontology for the web. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudŕe-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 30-43. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
16. Lee, W., Bürger, T., Sasaki, F.: Use cases and requirements for ontology and API for media object 1.0 (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/media-annot- reqs/
17. Fraņcois, A.R., Nevatia, R., Hobbs, J., Bolles, R.C., Smith, J.R.: VERL: an ontology framework for representing and annotating video events. IEEE Multimedia 12(4), 76-86 (2005)
18. Westermann, U., Jain, R.: Toward a common event model for multimedia applications. IEEE Multimedia 14(1), 19-29 (2007)
19. Neumann, B., Möller, R.: On Scene Interpretation with Description Logics. Image and Vision Computing 26, 82-101 (2008)
20. Kokar, M.M., Matheus, C.J., Baclawski, K.: Ontology-based situation awareness. Information Fusion 10(1), 83-98 (2009)
21. Hobbs, J., Pan, F.: Time ontology in OWL (2006), http://www.w3.org/TR/ owl-time/
22. Maillot, N., Thonnat, M., Boucher, A.: Towards ontology-based cognitive vision. Machine Vision and Applications 16(1), 33-40 (2004)
23. Grütter, R., Scharrenbach, T., Bauer-Messmer, B.: Improving an RCC-Derived geospatial approximation by OWL axioms. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2008), pp. 293-306 (2008)
24. Noy, N., Rector, A.: Defining n-ary relations on the semantic web (2006), http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/