Restoration of abandoned agricultural lands toward habitats for umbrella species;Restauración de zonas agrícolas abandonadas para hábitats de especies de interés

Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 375-389

  Nekhay, O ^a   Arriaza, M ^a  

^a IFAPA CENTRO ALAMEDA DEL OBISPO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; LYNX; LYNX PARDINUS; OLEA EUROPAEA;

EID: 70350676531     PISSN: 1695971X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5424/sjar/2009072-429     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AULL-HYDE R., ERDOGAN S., DUKE J.M., 2006. An experiment on the consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in AHP. Eur J Oper Res 171, 290-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.06.037.
2. BOJA, 2003. Decree 251/2003, of 5 November, "Plan de Ordenación de los Recursos Naturales y el Plan Rector de Uso y Gestión del Parque Natural Sierra de Cardeña y Montoro". Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía, 213. [In Spanish].
3. CADENAS R., GARCÍA J., SIMÓN M.A., 2004. Aplicación de un sistema de evaluación multicriterio a la conservación de fauna silvestre mediante un SIG. XI Congreso de Métodos Cuantitativos, SIG yTeledetección:Territorio y medio ambiente: métodos cuantitativos y técnicas de información geográfi-ca. Murcia, Spain, Sept 20-23. pp. 289-302. [In Spanish].
4. DELIBES M., RODRIGUEZ A., FERRERAS P., 2000. Action plan for the conservation of the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) in Europe. Nature and Environment 111, 1-45.
5. EEC, 1992. Council Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora ('The Habitats and Species Directive'), 92/43/EEC. European Economic Community.
6. EGMASA, 2001. Usos de suelo de Andalucía. Empresa de Gestión Medioambiental, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla. (CD).
7. FERNANDEZ N., DELIBES M., PALOMARES F., MLADE-NOFF D.J., 2003. Identifying breeding habitat for the Iberian lynx: inferences from a fine-scale spatial analysis. Ecol Appl 13, 1310-1324. doi: 10.1890/02-5081.
8. FERNANDEZ N., DELIBES M., PALOMARES F., 2006. Landscape evaluation in conservation: molecular sampling and habitat modeling for the Iberian lynx. Ecol Appl 16(3), 1037-1049. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1037: LEICMS]2.0.CO;2.
9. FERNANDEZ N., DELIBES M., PALOMARES F., 2007. Habitat-related heterogeneity in breeding in a metapopulation of the Iberian lynx. Ecography 30(3), 431-439. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.05005.x.
10. FERRERAS P., ALDAMA J.J., BELTRÁN J.F., DELIBES M., 1992. Rates and causes of mortality in a fragmented population of Iberian lynx Felis pardina Temminck, 1824. Biol Conserv 61, 197-202. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(92) 91116-A.
11. FERRERAS P., BELTRÁN J.F., ALDAMA J.J., DELIBES M., 1997. Spatial organization and land tenure system of the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). J Zool 243, 163-189.
12. FERRERAS P., DELIBES M., PALOMARES F., FEDRIANI J.M., CALZADA J., REVILLA E., 2004. Proximate and ultimate causes of dispersal in the Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus. Behav Ecol 15, 31-40. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arg097.
13. FORMAN E., PENIWATI K., 1998. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Eur J Oper Res 108, 165-169. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0.
14. FORMAN E.H., SELLY M.A., 2001. Decision by objectives. World Scientific Publishing Co. 416 pp. Available at: http://www.expertchoice.com/dbo/. [07/03/2006].
15. GAONA P., FERRERAS P., DELIBES M., 1998. Dynamics and viability of a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Ecological Monographs 68, 349-370. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0349:DAVOAM] 2.0.CO;2.
16. GONZÁLEZ-OREJA J.A., 1998. Non-natural mortality of the Iberian lynx in the fragmented population of Sierra de Gata (W Spain). Miscellanea Zoologica 21, 31-35.
17. GUZMÁN J.N., GARCIA F.J., GARROTE G., PÉREZ DE AYALA R., IGLESIAS C., 2004. El lince ibérico (Lynx pardinus) en España y Portugal. Censodiagnóstico de sus poblaciones. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid. 184 pp. [In Spanish].
18. HENLE K., ALARD D., CLITHEROW J., COBB P., FIR-BANK L., KULL T., MCCRACKEN D., MORITZ R.F.A., NIEMELÄ J., REBANE M., WASCHER D., WATT A., YOUNG J., 2008. Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe- A review. Agr Ecosyst Environ 124, 60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005.
19. HÖCHTL F., LEHRINGER S., KONOLD W., 2005. "Wilder-ness": what it mean when it becomes a reality- a case study from the southwestern Alps. Landscape Urban Plan 70, 85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.006.
20. IUCN, 2002. Updated IUCN red list of threatened species released online. Species 38, 6-7.
21. JANKOWSKI P., NYERGES T., 2001. Geographic informa-tion systems for group decision making. Taylor & Francis, London.
22. JEANNERET P.H., SCHUPBACH B., LUKA H., 2003. Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes. Agr Ecosyst Environ 98, 311-320. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03) 00091-4.
23. JONES, M.E., PAINE, T.D., 2006. Detecting changes in insect herbivore communities along a pollution gradient. Environmental Pollution 142, 377-387. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.013.
24. JUNTA DE ANDALUCÍA, 2004a. Informe sobre áreas potenciales de reintroducción de lince ibérico en Andalucía. Proyecto LIFE Naturaleza. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Sevilla. [In Spanish].
25. JUNTA DE ANDALUCÍA, 2004b. Ortofotografía en blanco y negro, provincia de Córdoba Consejería de Obras Publicas y Transportes, Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca, Conseje-ría de Medio Ambiente, Sevilla. [In Spanish].
26. JUNTA DE ANDALUCÍA, 2005. Ortofotografía en color, provincia de Córdoba Consejería de Obras Publicas y Transportes, Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Sevilla. [In Spanish].
27. MALANSON G.P., 1993. Riaprian landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. MALCZEWSKI J., 1999. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
29. MARTÍN A., FERNÁNDEZ R., 2006. Long term persistence of dehesas. Evidences from history. Agrofor Syst 67(1), 19-28. doi: 10.1007/s10457-005-1110-8.
30. MÉSZÁROS C S., RAPCSÁK T., 1996. On sensitivity analysis for a class of decision systems. Decis Support Syst 16, 231-240. doi: 10.1016/0167-9236(95)00012-7.
31. MÜHLENBERG M., SLOWIK J., 1997. Kulturlandschaft als Lebensraum. Quelle & Meyer, Wiesbaden. [In German].
32. NAIMAN R.J., DECAMPS H., 1997. The ecology of inter-faces: Riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28, 621-658. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621.
33. NAIMAN R.J., DECAMPS H., POLLOCK M., 1993. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiver-sity. Ecol Appl 3(2), 209-212. doi: 10.2307/1941822.
34. NOWELL K., JACKSON P., 1996. Wild cats: status survey and action plan. IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
35. PALOMARES F., 2001. Vegetation structure and prey abundance requirements of the Iberian lynx: implications for the design of reserves and corridors. J Appl Ecol 38, 9-18. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00565.x.
36. PALOMARES F., DELIBES M., FERRERAS P., FEDRIANI J.M., CALZADA J., REVILLA E., 2000. Iberian lynx in a fragmented landscape: predispersal, dispersal, and postdispersal habitats. Conserv Biol 14(3), 809-818. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98539.x.
37. PALOMARES F., DELIBES M., REVILLA E., CALZADA J., FEDRIANI J.M., 2001. Spatial ecology of Iberian lynx and abundance of European rabbits in Southwestern Spain. Wildlife Monogr 148, 1-36.
38. PALOMINO D., CARRASCAL L.M., 2007. Threshold distance to nearby cities and roads influence the bird community of a mosaic landscape. Biological Conservation 140 (1-2), 100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.029.
39. PEDERSEN Å.Ø., NYHUUS S., BLINDHEIM T., WERGE-LAND KRONG O.M., 2004. Implementation of a GIS-based management tool for conservation of biodiversity within the municipality of Oslo, Norway. Landscape Urban Plan 68, 429-438. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00148-8.
40. RODRIGUEZ A., DELIBES M., 1990. El Lince Ibérico (Lynx pardina) en España. Distribución y problemas de conservación. Instituto Nacional para la Conservación de la Natu-raleza. Madrid. [In Spanish].
41. RODRIGUEZ A., DELIBES M., 1992. Current range and status of the Iberian lynx Felis pardina Temminck 1824, in Spain. Biol Conserv 61, 189-196. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(92)91115-9.
42. RODRIGUEZ A., DELIBES M., 2002. Internal structure and patterns of contraction in the geographic range of the Iberian lynx. Ecography 25, 314-328. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250308.x.
43. RODRIGUEZ A., DELIBES M., 2003. Population fragmentation and extinction in the Iberian lynx. Biol Conserv 109(3),321-331. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00158-1.
44. RODRIGUEZ A., DELIBES M., 2004. Patterns and causes of non-natural mortality in the Iberian lynx during a 40-years period of range contraction. Biol Conserv 118(2), 151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.07.018.
45. SAATY T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill, NY. SAATY T.L., 2003. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary? Eur J Oper Res 145, 85-91. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8.
46. SAATY T.L., 2005. Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. 3rd ed, RWS Publications, Pitts-burgh, PA, USA.
47. SAATY T.L., HU G., 1998. Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in analytic hierarchy process. Appl Math Letters 11(4), 121-125. doi: 10.1016/S0893-9659(98) 00068-8.
48. SAATY T.L., VARGAS L., 2000. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. 2nd ed, Volume 6, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
49. SCOTT M.J., 2001. MATLAB free extension: Function AHP-CAL Available at: http://design.me.uic.edu/software.Consultedon 21/09/2007.
50. SHIELDS D.F., COOPER J.R.C.M., KNIGHT S.S., MOORE M.T., 2003. Stream corridor restoration research: a long and winding road. Ecol Eng 20(5), 441-454. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2003.08.005.
51. SIMBERLOFF D., 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and key-stones: is single-species management passé in the land-scape era? Biol Conserv 83(3), 247-257. doi: 10.1016/ S0006-3207(97)00081-5.
52. STORE R., KANGAS J., 2001. Integrating spatial multicriteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modelling. Landscape Urban Plan 55, 79-93. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00120-7.
53. VAN DER HORST D., GIMONA A., 2005. Where new farm woodlands support biodiversity action plans: a spatial multicriteria analysis. Biol Conserv 123, 421-432. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon. 2004.11.020.
54. WALDHARDT R., 2003. Biodiversity and landscape-summary, conclusions and perspectives. Agr Ecosyst Environ 98,305-309. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00090-2.
55. WHITFORD, V., ENNOS, A.R., HANDLEY, J.F., 2001. "City form and natural process"- indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape Urban Plan 57, 91-103. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00192-X.
56. WOLTERS R., 1999. Strategic actions for European land-scapes. Proc. European Workshop on Landscape Assessment as a Policy Tool: Landscape and Sustainability. Strasbourg, Germany, March 25-26. pp. 12-19.