Complex evaluation of the use of information technologies in the countries of eastern and central Europe

Journal of Business Economics and Management

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 183-191

  Ginevičius, Romualdas ^a   Podvezko, Valentinas ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Indicator of new economy; Multiple criteria analysis; New economy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745983050     PISSN: 16111699     EISSN: 20294433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16111699.2004.9636082     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Piatkowski, M., 2004. Economic and institutional factors of the ‘new economy’ in transition economies. Bielorussian journal of economics,:14–24.
2. De Masi, Estevao, M., and Kodres, L., 2001. Who Has A New Economy?. Finance & Development, 39 (1) June:2 //http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/ 06/demasi.htm
3. Pohjola, M., ed. 2001. Information Technology, Productivity and Economic Growth, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
4. Simon, H., 1971. “ Designing Organizations for an Information - rich World ”. In Computers, Communications and the Public Interest, Edited by:Greenberg, M., 40–41. Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins Press.
5. Stiroh, K., 2002. “ New and Old Economics in the ≪New Economy≫ ”. In Economic Policy in the ≪New Economy≫, Edited by:Siebert, Horst. Berlin:Springer-Verlag.
6. IMF. October 2001. World Economic Outlook. The Information Technology Revolution, October, 103–142. Washington DC:International Monetary Fund. // http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2001/02/pdf/ chapter3.pdf
7. Jorgenson, D. W., and Stiroh, K. J., 2000. Raising the Speed Limit:U. S. Economic Growth in the Information Age. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,:125–211. //http://www.ny.frb.org/rmaghome/economist/stiroh/ksgrw.pdf
8. OECD. 2001. The New Economy:Beyond the Hype, Paris:Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
9. North, D. C., March 1997. The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics to an Understanding of the Transition Problem. WIDER Annual Lectures 1, March, Helsinki:UNU/WIDER.
10. North, D. C., 1994. Economic Performance through Time. American Economic Review, 84:359–368.
11. Zinnes, C., Eilat, Y., and Sachs, J., 2001. Benchmarking Competitiveness in Transition Economies. Economics of Transition, 9 (No 2):315–353.
12. Claugue, C., ed. 1997. Institutions and Economic Development:Growth and Governance in Less-Developed and Post- Socialist Countries, Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Deiss, R., 2002. “ Information Society Statistics. Data for Candidate Countries ”. Eurostat. Statistics in Focus. Theme 4–17/2002//http://europa.eu.int/comm/eurostat
14. Mohnen. 2001. “ International R&D Spillovers and Economic Growth ”. In Information Technology, Productivity and Economic Growth, Edited by:Pohjola, M., Oxford:Oxford University Press.
15. Coe, D. T., and Helpman, E., 1995. International R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review, 39:859–887.
16. Greenwood, J., and Smith, B., 1997. Financial Markets in Development and the Development of Financial Markets. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21 (No 1):145–181.
17. King, R., and Levine, R., 1993. Finance and Growth:Schumpeter Might Be Right. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (No 3):513–542.
18. Levine, R., 1997. Financial Development and Economic Growth:Views and Agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35 (No 2):688–726.
19. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2001) Executive Report //www.entreworld.org.
20. Dresdner Kleinwort Capital. 18 October 2001. “ Venture Capital and Private Equity Investment in Poland ”. Edited by:Heath, Janusz. 18 October, not published
21. Laafia, I., 2000. “ R&D Expenditure and Personnel in Candidate Countries and the Russian Federation in 1998 ”. Eurostat. Statistics in Focus. Theme 9–3/2000//http://europa.eu.int/comm/eurostat
22. OECD. 2001. “ The Science, Technology, and Industry Scoreboard 2001 ”. //http://wwwl.oecd.org/publications/e-book/92–2001 -04–1 -2987/gB-2-b.htm
23. Barro, R. J., and Sala-i-Martin, X., 1995. Economic Growth, New York:McGraw-Hill.
24. Bassanini, A., and Scarpetta, S., 2001. Does Human Capital Matter for Growth in OECD Countries? Evidence from Pooled Mean-group Estimates, Working Paper No. 289 Paris:OECD, Economics Department.
25. The Economist. 4 February 1999. “ Working Man's Burden ”. 4 February
26. OECD. September 1999. Implementing the OECD Jobs Strategy:Assessing Performance and Policy, September, Paris:Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
27. Hwang, C.L., and Lin, M. J., 1987. Group Decision Making under Multiple Criteria:Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag.
28. Ginevicius, R., and Podvezko, V. 2001. Complex evaluation of economical-social development of Lithuanian regions. Civil Engineering (Statyba), VII (No 4):304–309. Vilnius:Technika
29. Ginevicius, R., and Podvezko, V., 2004. “ Determination of weightiness of the hierarchically-structured organization according to its commercial activity. Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering ”. 21–33. Poznan:Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology. ISSN 1642–9303
30. Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G-H., 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods:A comparative analysis of VIKON and TOPSIS, EJOR. European Journal of Operational Research, 156:445–455.
31. World Economic Forum. 2001. “ Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002 ”.