Axillary bud outgrowth potential is determined by parent apical bud activity

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 60, Issue 15, 2009, Pages 4275-4285

  Thomas, R G ^a   Hay, M J M ^a  

^a AGRESEARCH GRASSLANDS   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Axillary bud outgrowth; Branch development; Bud activation; Bud outgrowth potential; Nodal roots; Prostrate clonal herbs; Root signals; Tradescantia fluminensis; Trifolium repens

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLOVER; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PLANT; PLANT ROOT; PLANT STEM;

PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; PLANT STEMS; TRIFOLIUM;

TRADESCANTIA; TRADESCANTIA FLUMINENSIS; TRIFOLIUM REPENS;

EID: 70350671257     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp258     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aguilar-Martínez JA, Posa-Carrió n C, Cubas P. 2007. Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. The Plant Cell 19, 458-472.
2. Bangerth F, Li CJ, Gruber J. 2000. Mutual interaction of auxin and cytokinins in regulating correlative dominance. Plant Growth Regulation 32, 205-217.
3. Beveridge CA. 2006. Axillary bud outgrowth: sending a message. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9, 35-40.
4. Denne MP. 1966. Diurnal and plastochronal changes in the shoot apex of Tradescantia fluminensis Vell. New Zealand Journal of Botany 4, 444-454.
5. Dun EA, Ferguson BJ, Beveridge CA. 2006. Apical dominance and shoot branching. Divergent opinions or divergent mechanisms? Plant Physiology 142, 812-819.
6. Ferguson BJ, Beveridge CA. 2009. Roles for auxin, cytokinin and stigolactone in regulating shoot branching. Plant Physiology 149, 1929-1944.
7. Gomez-Roldan V, Fermas S, Brewer PB, et al. 2008. Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature 455, 189-194.
8. Gould KS, Cutter EG, Young JPW, Charlton WA. 1987. Positional differences in size, morphology, and in in vitro performance of pea axillary buds. Canadian Journal of Botany 65, 406-411.
9. Grbic V, Bleecker AB. 2000. Axillary meristem development in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 21, 215-223.
10. Hay MJM, Kim M, McLean RW, Gonzalez-Rodriguez A. 1993. Defoliation of young branch and parent stolons of white clover in rotationally grazed pastures. Proceedings of the 17th International Grassland Congress 128-129.
11. Hay MJM, Thomas RG, Tilbrook JC. 2003. Control of shoot branching by nodal roots in Trifolium repens when nutrient supply is sub-optimal. Abstracts of the 7th Clonal Plant Workshop. Kuusamo, Finland: p.29.
12. Husain SM, Linck AJ. 1966. Relationship of apical dominance to the nutrient accumulation pattern in Pisum sativum var. Alaska. Physiologia Plantarum 19, 992-1010.
13. Johnson X, Brcich T, Dun EA, Goussot M, Haurogné K, Beveridge CA, Rameau C. 2006. Branching genes are conserved across species. Genes controlling a novel signal in pea are coregulated by other long-distance signals. Plant Physiology 142, 1014-1026.
14. Leyser O. 2005. The fall and rise of apical dominance. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 15, 468-471.
15. Li CJ, Bangerth F. 1999. Autoinhibition of indoleacetic acid transport in the shoots of two-branched pea (Pisum sativum) plants and its relationship to correlative dominance. Physiologia Plantarum 106, 415-420.
16. McDaniel CN, Hsu FC. 1976. Position-dependent development of tobacco meristems. Nature 259, 564-565.
17. McSteen P, Leyser O. 2005. Shoot branching. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56, 353-374.
18. Napoli CA. 1996. Highly branched phenotype of the petunia dad-1 mutant is reversed by grafting. Plant Physiology 111, 27-37.
19. Napoli CA, Beveridge CA, Snowden KC. 1999. Re-evaluating concepts of apical dominance and the control of axillary bud outgrowth. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 44, 127-169.
20. Ongaro V, Leyser O. 2008. Hormonal control of shoot branching. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 67-74.
21. Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA, Baird DB, Soutar DM. 2007. GenStat for Windows (10th edn). Introduction. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International.
22. Shimizu-Sato S, Tanaka M, Mori H. 2009. Auxin-cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching. Plant Molecular Biology 69, 429-435.
23. Simons JL, Napoli CA, Janssen BJ, Plummer KM, Snowden KC. 2007. Analysis of the DECREASED APICAL DOMINANCE genes of petunia in the control of axillary branching. Plant Physiology 143, 697-706.
24. Tanaka M, Takei K, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Mori H. 2006. Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominance. The Plant Journal 45, 1028-1036.
25. Thomas RG, Hay MJM. 2004. Evidence suggests plagiotropic clonal species have evolved a branching physiology emphasizing regulation by nodal roots. Evolutionary Ecology 18, 409-428.
26. Thomas RG, Hay MJM. 2007. Cumulative activation of axillary buds by nodal roots in Trifolium repens L. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 2069-2078.
27. Thomas RG, Hay MJM. 2008a. Regulation of shoot branching patterns by the basal root system: towards a predictive model. Journal of Experimental Botany 59, 1163-1173.
28. Thomas RG, Hay MJM. 2008b. Adaptive variation in physiological traits underpinning stem elongation responses among nodally-rooting stoloniferous herbs. Evolutionary Ecology 22, 369-381.
29. Thomas RG, Hay MJM, Newton PCD. 2002. A developmentally based categorisation of branching in Trifolium repens L.: Influence of nodal roots. Annals of Botany 90, 379-389.
30. Thomas RG, Hay MJM, Newton PCD, Tilbrook JC. 2003a. Relative importance of nodal roots and apical buds in the control of branching in Trifolium repens L. Plant and Soil 255, 55-66.
31. Thomas RG, Hay MJM, Newton PCD. 2003b. Relationships among shoot sinks for resources exported from nodal roots regulate branch development of distal non-rooted portions of Trifolium repens L. Journal of Experimental Botany 54, 2091-2104.
32. Umehara M, Hanada A, Yoshida S, et al. 2008. Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 455, 195-201.
33. Wilman D, Simpson D. 1988. The growth of white clover (Trifolium repens) in five sown hill swards grazed by sheep. Journal of Applied Ecology 25, 631-642.