The cement-bone interface: Is it susceptible to damage adaptive remodeling?

IFMBE Proceedings

Volumn 22, Issue , 2008, Pages 1990-1993

  Lennon, A B ^a   Prendergast, Patrick ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Bone remodeling; FEA; Hip replacement; Patient specific

Indexed keywords

ACCUMULATED DAMAGE; ASEPTIC LOOSENING; BIOLOGICAL REACTION; BONE ADAPTATION; BONE REMODELING; CONSTANT RATE; CRITICAL DAMAGE; DAMAGE ACCUMULATION; DAMAGED REGION; DATA SETS; FEA; HIP ARTHROPLASTIES; HIP REPLACEMENTS; LOCAL STRAINS; MODEL PARAMETERS; PATIENT-SPECIFIC; REFERENCE STRAINS; SOFT TISSUE; TISSUE DENSITY; WEAR DEBRIS;

ALGORITHMS; BONE; CEMENTS; DEBRIS; HIP PROSTHESES; RADIOGRAPHY;

BONE CEMENT;

EID: 70350641200     PISSN: 16800737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_474     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Gruen TA, McNeice GM & Amstutz HC. "modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (1979) : pp. 17-27.
2. Weinans H, Huiskes R & Grootenboer HJ. Quantitative analysis of bone reactions to relative motions at implant-bone interfaces. J Biomech (1993) 26: pp. 1271-1281.
3. Viceconti M, Ricci S, Pancanti A & Cappello A. Numerical model to predict the long-term mechanical stability of cementless orthopaedicimplants. Med Biol Eng Comput (2004) 42: pp. 747-753.
4. Mann KA, Mocarski R, Damron LA, Allen MJ & Ayers DC. Mixedmode failure response of the cement-bone interface. J. Orthop. Res. (2001) 19: pp. 1153-1161.
5. Wolff J. Das gesetz der transformation der knochen. . Hirschwald Berlin, Hirschwald, 1892.
6. Frost HM. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (satmu): 1. redefining wolff's law: the bone modeling problem. Anat. Rec. (1990) 226: pp. 403-413.
7. Cowin, S C & Hegedus, D H. Bone remodeling i: theory of adaptive elasticity. (1976) 6: p. 313--326.
8. Weinans H, Huiskes R & Grootenboer HJ. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulation models. J Biomech (1992) 25: pp. 1425- 1441.
9. Jacobs CR, Simo JC, Beaupré GS & Carter DR. Adaptive bone remodelling incorporating simultaneous density and anisotropy considerations. Journal of Biomechanics (1997) 30: pp. 603-613.
10. Carter DR. Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif. Tissue Int. (1984) 36 Suppl 1: p. S19-24.
11. Prendergast PJ & Taylor D. Design of intramedullary prostheses to prevent bone loss: predictions based on damage-stimulated remodelling. J Biomed Eng (1992) 14: pp. 499-506.
12. McNamara LM & Prendergast PJ. Bone remodelling algorithms incorporating both strain and microdamage stimuli. J Biomech (2007) 40: pp. 1381-1391.
13. Mulvihill BM & Prendergast PJ. An algorithm for bone mechanoresponsiveness: implementation to study the effect of patient-specific cell mechanosensitivity on trabecular bone loss. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin (2008) : p. 1.
14. Carter DR, Hayes WC & Schurman DJ. Fatigue life of compact bone- -ii. effects of microstructure and density. J Biomech (1976) 9: pp. 211-218.
15. Martin RB. Porosity and specific surface of bone. Crit Rev Biomed Eng (1984) 10: pp. 179-222.
16. Carter DR & Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a twophase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1977) 59: pp. 954-962.
17. Weinans H, Huiskes R & Grootenboer HJ. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling. J. Orthop. Res. (1992) 10: pp. 845-853.
18. Morlock M, Schneider E, Bluhm A, Vollmer M, Bergmann G, Müller V & Honl M. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech (2001) 34: pp. 873-881.
19. Lennon AB, Britton JR, MacNiocaill RF, Byrne DP, Kenny PJ & Prendergast PJ. Predicting revision risk for aseptic loosening of femoral components in total flip arthroplasty in individual patients - a finite element study. J Orthop Res (2007) 25: pp. 779-788.