A framework of intellectual capital management based on ISO 9001 quality management system: The case study of ISO 9001 certified public R&D institute

Knowledge and Process Management

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 162-173

  Kim, Dong Young ^a   Kumar, Vinod ^a   Kumar, Uma ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350638799     PISSN: 10924604     EISSN: 10991441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/kpm.333     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andrikopoulos A. 2005. The real-options approach to intellectual capital analysis: a critique. Knowledge & Process Management 12(3): 217-224.
2. Bhuiyan N, Alam N. 2005. An investigation into issues related to the latest version of IS. 9000: Total Quality Management 16(2): 199-213.
3. Boedker C, Guthrie J, Cuganesan S. 2005. An integrated framework for visualizing intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(4): 510-527.
4. Bygdas A, Royrvik E, Gjerde B. 2004. Integrative visualisation and knowledge-enabled value creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(4): 540-555.
5. Casadesus M, Gimenez G, Heras I. 2001. Benefits of ISO 9000 implementation in Spanish industry. European Business Review 13(6): 327-335.
6. Cegarra-Navarro JG, Rodrigo-Moya B. 2005. Learning facilitating factors of teamwork on intellectual capital creation. Knowledge & Process Management 12(1): 32-42.
7. Chaminade C, Johanson U. 2003. Can guidelines for intellectual capital management and reporting be considered without addressing cultural differences? Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(4): 528-542.
8. Clinton BD, Webber SA, Hassell JM. 2002. Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process. Management Accounting Quarterly 3(3): 1-11.
9. Cordazzo M. 2005. IC statement vs environmental and social reports. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(3): 441-464.
10. Dattero R. 2006. Collaboration between the top knowledge management and intellectual capital researchers. Knowledge & Process Management 13(4): 264-269.
11. Dissanayaka SM, Kumaraswamy MM, Karim K, Marosszeky M. 2001. Evaluating outcomes from ISO 9000- certified quality systems of Hong Kong constructors. Total Quality Management 12(1): 29-40.
12. Dowlatshahi S, Urias C. 2004. An empirical study of ISO certification in the maquiladora industry. International Journal of Production Economics 88: 291-306.
13. Edvinsson L, Malone MS. 1997. Intellectual Capital: Realizing Yours Truly,Our Company's True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. Harper Business: New York.
14. Edvinsoon L, Sullivan P. 1996. Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal 14(4): 356-364.
15. Evans JR, Lindsay WM. 2008. Managing for Quality and Performance Excellence. Thomson: South-Western, Mason.
16. Germany guideline. Germany, Berlin 2004. Intellectual capital statement guideline-made in Germany.
17. Gupta P. Beyond 2006. PDCA-a new process management model. Quality Progress 39(7): 45-52.
18. Guthrie J. 2001. The management, measurement and the reporting of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(1): 27-41.
19. Guthrie J, Johason U, Bukh PN, Sánchez P. 2003. Intangibles and the transparent enterprise new strands of knowledge. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(4): 429-440.
20. Heng MSH. 2001. Mapping intellectual capital in a small manufacturing enterprise. Journal of Intellectual Capital 2(1): 53-60.
21. Hwang YH, Park JG. 2006. Approaches and requirements to develop and improve the standard processes for a research and development. Systems Engineering 9(1): 35-44.
22. ISO Geneva, 2000(a). International standard ISO 9001:2000 quality management systems-requirements.
23. ISO Geneva, 2000(b). International standard ISO 9001:2000 quality management systems-fundamentals and vocabulary.
24. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. 1992. The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review January-February 71-79.
25. Lin C, Wu C. 2005. A knowledge creation model for ISO 9001:2000. Total Quality Management 16(5): 657-670.
26. Marr B, Moustaghfir K. 2005. Defining intellectual capital: a three-dimensional approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital 43(9): 1114-1128.
27. Melo LB, Sampaio MI. Quality measures for libraries and information services, Proceedings of IATUL 27th Annual Conference 2006. Porto (Portugal).
28. Meritum guideline. Spain: Madrid. 2002. Guidelines for managing and reporting on intangibles Fundación Airtel Móvil.
29. Mouritsen J, Larsen T, Bukh PN. 2005. Dealing with the knowledge economy: intellectual capital versus balanced scorecard. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(1): 8-27.
30. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242-266.
31. OECD Paris. 2006. Creating value from intellectual assets.
32. Reisinger H, Cravens KS, Tell N. 2003. Prioritizing performance measures within the balanced scorecard framework. Management International Review 43: 429-437.
33. Roos G, Roos J. 1997. Measuring your company's intellectual performance. Long Range Planning 30(3): 413-426.
34. Sanchez MP, Chaminade C, Olea M. 2000. Management of intangibles: an attempt to build a theory. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(4): 312-327.
35. Serenko A, Bontis N. 2004. Meta-review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity rankings. Knowledge & Process Management 11(3): 185-198.
36. Sveiby KE. ETRI IC-Reports 2004-2005 and future directions, Proceedings of the 2006 World IC Congress Korea, Seoul 2006.
37. Sveiby KE, San Francisco 1997. The new organizationl wealth.