Classification of process hazard scenario and SDG qualitative identification method

Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2503-2509

  Na, Yongliang ^a,b   Wu, Chongguang ^a   Xia, Yingchun ^a,c   Zhang, Weihua ^a,d  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Beijing Strong Information System Co Ltd   (China)

^c Beijing East Simulation and Control Technology Co Ltd   (China)

^d SINOPEC   (China)

Author keywords

Adverse consequence; Fault diagnosis; Hazard and operability study; Hazard identification; Hazard scenario; Layer of protection analysis; Root cause; Signed directed graph

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE; FAULT DIAGNOSIS; HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDY; HAZARD IDENTIFICATION; LAYER OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS; ROOT CAUSE; SIGNED DIRECTED GRAPH;

FAILURE ANALYSIS; FAULT DETECTION; GRAPH THEORY; GRAPHIC METHODS; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS;

HAZARDS;

EID: 70350610888     PISSN: 04381157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Center for Chemical Process Safety(CCPS)of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers(AIChE). Guidelines for Safe Automation of Chemical Processes. New York: Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1993.
2. American Petroleum Institute(API). Recommended Practice. Analysis, Design, Installation and Testing of Basic Surface Safety Systems for Offshore Production Platforms, 1994.
3. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 8502. Prevention of Furnace Explosions/Implosions in Multiple Burner Boiler-Furnaces, 1995.
4. U. S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA-PSM Standard-29-CFR, Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals 1910-119. www.osha.gov.
5. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61508, Functional Safety-Safety Related Systems, 1996.
6. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 61882, Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP Studies) Application Guide, 2001.
7. Wu Chongguang. System Modeling and Simulation. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2008.
8. Wu Chongguang, Zhang Beike, Ma Xin. The layers of protection analysis (LOPA) in process industry, Automation in Petro-chemical Industry, 2007(4): 1-3.
9. Williams Tom R. Layer of protection analysis: generating scenarios automatically from HAZOP data. Process Safety Progress, 2005, 24: 38-44.
10. Lapp S A, Powers G J, Computer-aided synthesis of fault-trees. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1977, 26(2): 2-12.
11. Iri M, Aoki K, O'shima E, Matsuyama H. An algorithm for diagnosis of system failures in the chemical process. Computer and Chemical Engineering, 1979(3): 489-493.
12. Umeda T, Kuriyama T. A graphical approach to cause and effect analysis of chemical processing systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 1980, 35: 2379-2388.
13. Shiozaki J, Matsuyama H, Tano K, O'shima E. Fault diagnosis of chemical processes by the use of signed, directed graphs. Extension to five-range patterns of abnormality. International Chemical Engineering, 1985, 25(4): 651-659.
14. Tsuge Y, Shiozaki J, Matsuyama H, O'shima E, Iguchi Y, Fuchigami M, Matsushita M. Fesibility study of a fault-diagnosis system for chemical plants. International Chemical Engineering, 1985, 25(4): 660-667.
15. Kramer M A, Palowitch B L. A rule-based approach to fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph. AIChE Journal, 1987, 33(7): 1607-1078.
16. Shiozaki J, Shibata B, Matsuyama H, O'shima E. Fault diagnosis of chemical processes utilizing signed direted graphs-improvement by using temporal information. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 1989, 36(4): 469-474.
17. Chang C C, Yu C C. On-line fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 1990, 29(7): 1290-1299.
18. Yu C C, Lee C. Fault diagnosis based on qualitative/quantitative process knowledge. AIChE Journal, 1991, 37(4): 617-628.
19. Wang X Z, Yang S A, Yang S H, Mcgreavy C. The application of fuzzy qualitative simulation in safety and operability assessment of process plants. Computers Chem. Engng., 1996, 20: 671-676.
20. Tarifa E E, Scenna N J. Fault diagnosis, direct graphs, and fuzzy logic. Computers Chem. Engng., 1997, 21: 649-654.
21. Vaidhyanathan R, Venkatasubramanian V. Experience with an expert system for automated HAZOP analysis. Computers Chem. Engng., 1996, 20: 1589-1594.
22. Vedam H, Venkatasubramanian V. Signed digraph based multiple fault diagnosis. Computers Chem. Engng., 1997, 21: 655-660.
23. Mylaraswamy D, Venkatasubramanian V. A hybrid framework for large scale process fault diagnosis. Computers Chem. Engng., 1997, 21: 935-940.
24. Wu Chongguang, Xia Tao, Zhang Beike. The qualitative simulation based on deep knowledge model of signed directed graph. Journal of System Simulation, 2003, 15(10): 1351-1355.
25. Zhang Beike, Xia Tao, Wu Chongguang. Test graph for SDG inference engine and its demonstration. Journal of System Simulation, 2003, 15(10): 1369-1373.
26. Xia Tao, Zhang Beike, Wu Chongguang. Architectural design of hazard, safety and control simulation platform for petrochemical process. Journal of System Simulation, 2003, 15(10): 1388-1390.
27. Li Anfeng, Xia Tao, Zhang Beike, Zhang Zhaoqian, Wu Chongguang. SDG modeling approach for chemical engineering process. Journal of System Simulation, 2003, 15(10): 1364-1368.
28. Zhang Zhaoqian, Wu Chongguang, Zhang Beike, Xia Tao, Li Anfeng. SDG multiple fault diagnosis by real-time inverse inference. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2005, 87: 173-189.
29. Lee Gibaek, Song Sang-Oak, Yoon En Sup. Multiple-fault diagnosis based on system decomposition and dynamic PLS. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2003, 42: 6145-6154.
30. Lee Gibaek, Tosukhowong Thidarat, Lee Jay H. Fault detection and diagnosis of pulp mill process//16th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering and 9th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering, 2006: 1461-1466.