SDG multiple fault diagnosis by real-time inverse inference

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 87, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 173-189

  Zhang, Zhao qian ^a   Wu, Chong guang ^a   Zhang, Bei ke ^a   Xia, Tao ^a   Li, An feng ^a  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Inference engine; Multiple fault diagnosis; Qualitative simulation; Real time inverse inference; SDG

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFERENCE ENGINES; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PROGRAM DIAGNOSTICS;

MULTIPLE FAULT DIAGNOSIS; QUALITATIVE SIMULATION; REAL TIME INVERSE INFERENCE; SIGNED DIRECTED GRAPHS (SDG);

GRAPH THEORY;

EID: 5444251103     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Venkatsubramanian V., Rengaswamy R., Yin K., Kavuri S.N. A review of fault detection and diagnosis. Part I: quantitative model-based methods. Comput Chem Engng. 27:2003;293-311.
2. Venkatsubramanian V., Rengaswamy R., Yin K., Kavuri S.N. A review of fault detection and diagnosis. Part II: qualitative models and search strategies. Comput Chem Engng. 27:2003;313-326.
3. Venkatsubramanian V., Rengaswamy R., Yin K., Kavuri S.N. A review of fault detection and diagnosis. Part III: process history based methods. Comput Chem Engng. 27:2003;327-346.
4. Wilcox N.A., Himmmelblau D.M. The possible cause and effect graphs (PCEG) model for fault diagnosis - I. Methodology. Comput Chem Engng. 18:(2):1994;103-116.
5. Wang W.-h., Zhou D.-h. Survey on qualitative/semi-qualitative based fault detection and diagnosis techniques. Control Theory Appl. 19:(5):2002;653-659.
6. Zhou D, Yinchuan YE. Modern fault diagnosis and folerent control; 2000.
7. Iri M., Aoki K., O'shima E., Matsuyama H. An algorithm for diagnosis of system failures in the chemical process. Comput Chem Engng. 3:1979;489-493.
8. Lapp S.A., Powers G.J. Computer-aided synthesis of fault trees. IEEE Trans Reliab. R-26:(4):1977;2-13.
9. Umeda T., Kuriyama T. A graphical approach to cause and effect analysis of chemical processing systems. Chem Engng Sci. 35:1980;2379-2388.
10. Shiozaki J., Matsuyama H., Tano K., O'shima E. Fault diagnosis of chemical processes by the use of signed, directed graphs. Extension to five-range patterns of abnormality. Int Chem Engng. 25:(4):1985;651-659.
11. Tsuge Y., Shiozaki J., Matsuyama H., O'shima K.E., Iguchi Y., Fuchigami M., Matsushita M. Fesibility study of a fault-diagnosis system for chemical plants. Int Chem Engng. 25:(4):1985;660-667.
12. Kramer M.A., Palowitch B.L. A rule-based approach to fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph. AIChE J. 33:(7):1987;1078-1607.
13. Shiozaki J., Shibata B., Matsuyama H., O'shima E. Fault diagnosis of chemical processes utilizing signed directed graphs-improvement by using temporal information. IEEE Trans Ind Electr. 36:(4):1989;469-474.
14. Chang C.C., Yu C.C. On-line fault diagnosis using the signed directed graph. Ind Engng Chem Res. 29:(7):1990;1290-1299.
15. Yu C.C., Lee C. Fault diagnosis based on qualitative/quantitative process knowledge. AIChE J. 37:(4):1991;617-628.
16. Han C.-C., Shih R.-F., Lee L.-S. Quantifying signed directed graphs with the fuzzy set for fault diagnosis resolution improvement. Ind Engng Chem Res. 33:1994;1943-1954.
17. Shih R.-F., Lee L.-S. Use of fuzzy cause-effect digraph for resolution fault diagnosis for process plants. 1. Fuzzy cause-effect digraph. Ind Eng Chem Res. 34:1995;1688-1702.
18. Wang X.Z., Yang S.A., Yang S.H., McGreavy C. The application of fuzzy qualitative simulation in safety and operability assessment of process plants. Comput Chem Engng. 20:1996;S671-S676.
19. Tarifa E.E., Scenna N.J. Fault diagnosis, direct graphs, and fuzzy logic. Comput Chem Engng. 21:1997;649-654.
20. Dash S, Venkatsubramanian V. Challenges in the industrial applications of fault diagnosis systems.
21. Oyeleye O.O., Kramer M.A. Qualitative simulation of chemical process systems: steady-state analysis. AIChE J. 34:(9):1988;1441-1454.
22. Waters A., Ponton J.W. Qualitative simulation and fault propagation in process plants. Chem Engng Res Des. 67:1989;407-422.
23. Mei Q.-z, Liao J.-s, Sun H.-z. System reliability engineering fundaments. 1987;Science Press.
24. Srinivasan R., Venkatasubramanian V. Automating HAZOP analysis of batch chemical plants: Part I. The knowledge representation framework. Comput Chem Engng. 22:(9):1998;1345-1355.
25. Srinivasan R., Venkatasubramanian V. Automating HAZOP analysis of batch chemical plants: Part II. Algorithms and application. Comput Chem Engng. 22:(9):1998;1357-1370.
26. Venkatasubramanian V., Zhao J., Viswanatha S. Intellient system of HAZOP analysis of complex process plants. Comput Chem Engng. 24:2000;2291-2302.
27. Kuipers B. Qualitative reasoning: modeling and simulation with incomplete knowledge. Automatica. 25:(4):1989;571-585.
28. Zhang B.-., Xia T., Wu C.-. Test graph for SDG inference engine and its demonstration. J Syst Simulat: 10. 15:(10):2003;1369-1373.
29. Zhang B.-., Xia T., Wu C.-. Integrated SDG modeling, inference and post-processing software platform. J Syst Simulat: 10. 15:(10):2003;1360-1364.