Efficient and economic HPLC performance qualification

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 557-564

  Kaminski, Lukas ^a   Degenhardt, Matthias ^b   Ermer, Joachim ^c   Feußner, Claus ^d   Höwer Fritzen, Heidemarie ^e   Link, Peter ^f   Renger, Bernd ^g   Tegtmeier, Martin ^h,i   Wätzig, Hermann ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b ABBOTT GMBH AND CO KG   (Germany)

^c SANOFI AVENTIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH   (Germany)

^d Nycomed GmbH   (Germany)

^e W Spitzner Arzneimittelfabrik GmbH   (Germany)

^f LAZ GmbH   (Germany)

^g Vetter Pharma Fertigung GmbH and Co KG   (Germany)

^h Schaper & Brummer GmbH & Co KG   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fisher test; HPLC; Performance Qualification; Quality assurance; System suitability test

Indexed keywords

ANTHRACENE; GLIBENCLAMIDE; GLIMEPIRIDE; PROGESTERONE;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; LABORATORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 70350599518     PISSN: 07317085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bansal S.K., Layloff T., Bush E.D., Hamilton M., Hankinson E.A., Landy J.S., Lowes S., Nasr M.M., St Jean P.A., and Shah V.P. Qualification of analytical instruments for use in the pharmaceutical industry: a scientific approach. AAPS PharmSciTech 5 (2004) 1-8
2. Grisanti V., and Zachowski E.J. Operational and performance qualification. LC-GC N. Am. 20 (2002) 356-362
3. Bedson P., and Rudd D. The development and application of guidance on EQ of analytical instruments: high performance liquid chromatography. Accred. Qual. Assur. 4 (1999) 50-62
4. USP, United States Pharmacopoeia 31 NF-26 S1 General Chapter <1058>, 2008, Analytical Instrument Qualification.
5. Huber L., and Welebob L. Selecting parameters and limits for equipment operational qualification. Accred. Qual. Assur. 2 (1997) 316-322
6. Crowther J., Dowling J., Hartwick R., and Ciccone B. Performance qualification of HPLC instrumentation in regulated laboratories. LC-GC N. Am. 26 (2008)
7. European Commission. EU Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice, Annex 15 (2001), European Commission
8. Hall G., and Dolan J.W. Performance qualification of LC systems. LC-GC N. Am. 20 (2002) 842-848
9. Kaminski L., El Deeb S., and Watzig H. Repeatability of monolithic HPLC columns while using a flow program. J. Sep. Sci. 31 (2008) 1745-1749
10. Bedson P., and Sargent M. The development and application of guidance on equipment qualification of analytical instruments. Accred. Qual. Assur. 1 (1996) 265-275
11. Ph.Eur., European Pharmacopoeia 6.4. Chapter 2.2. 46, 2009, Chromatographic separation techniques.
12. Auterhoff H., and Kovar K.A. Identifizierung von Arzneistoffen (1998), WVG Stuttgart
13. Kumasaka K., Kojima T., Honda H., and Doi K. Screening and quantitative analysis for sulfonylurea-type antidiabetic agents in adulterated health food using TLC and HPLC. J. Health Science 51 (2005) 453-460
14. Merck SOP: Operational Qualification of the DAD L-7450 (1997)
15. Cabooter D., Lynen F., Sandra P., and Desmet G. Turbulence as a source of excessive baseline noise during high-speed isocratic and gradient separations using absorption detection. Anal. Chem. 80 (2008) 1679-1688
16. El Deeb S., Preu L., and Watzig H. Evaluation of monolithic HPLC columns for various pharmaceutical separations: method transfer from conventional phases and batch to batch repeatability. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 44 (2007) 85-95
17. El Deeb S., Schepers U., and Watzig H. A strategy to develop fast RP-HPLC methods using monolithic silica columns. J. Sep. Sci. 29 (2006) 1571-1577
18. Westlake W.J. Use of confidence intervals in analysis of comparative bioavailability trials. J. Pharm. Sci. 61 (1972) 1340-1341
19. Schepers U., and Watzig H. Application of the equivalence test for analytical method transfers: testing precision using the United States Pharmacopoeia concept <1010>. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 41 (2006) 290-292
20. Schepers U., and Watzig H. Application of the equivalence test according to a concept for analytical method transfers from the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE). J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 39 (2005) 310-314
21. USP, United States Pharmacopoeia 31 NF-26 S1 General Chapter <621>, 2008, System Suitability.
22. ICH, Guideline Q2 (R1): Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology (2005)
23. Baumann K. Regression and calibration for analytical separation techniques. Part II. Validation, weighted and robust regression. Process Contr. Qual. 10 (1997) 75-112