Automated Japanese essay scoring system based on articles written by experts

COLING/ACL 2006 - 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 233-240

  Ishioka, Tsunenori ^a   Kameda, Masayuki ^b  

^a The National Center for University Entrance Examinations   (Japan)

^b RICOH COMPANY LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION MODELING; LEARNING PROCESS; SCORING SYSTEMS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 70350578974     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1220175.1220205     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Bennet, R.E. and Bejar, I.I. 1998. Validity and automated scoring: It's not only the scoring, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 17(4):9-17.
2. Bereiter, C. 2003. Foreword. In Shermis, M. and Burstein, J. eds. Automated essay scoring: crossdisciplinary perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates.
3. Berry, M.W. 1992. Large scale singular value computations, International Journal of Supercomputer Applications. 6(1):13-49.
4. Burstein, J., Kukich, K., Wolff, S., Lu, C., Chodorow, M., Braden-Harder, L., and Harris, M.D. 1998. Automated Scoring Using A Hybrid Feature Identification Technique. the Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Available online: www.ets.org/research/erater.html
5. Chase, C.I. 1986. Essay test scoring : interaction of relevant variables, Journal of Educational Measurement, 23(1):33-41.
6. Chase, C.I. 1979. The impact of achievement expectations and handwriting quality on scoring essay tests, Journal of Educational Measurement, 16(1):293-297.
7. Cooper, P.L. 1984. The assessment of writing ability: a review of research, GRE Board Research Report, GREB No.82-15R. Available online: www.gre.org/reswrit.html#TheAssessmentofWriting
8. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K. and Harshman, R. 1990. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(7):391-407.
9. Duff, I.S., Grimes, R.G. and Lewis, J.G. 1989. Sparse matrix test problem. ACM Trans. Math. Software, 15:1-14.
10. Elliot, S. 2003. IntelliMetric: From Here to Validity, 71-86. In Shermis, M. and Burstein, J. eds. Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Foltz, P.W., Laham, D. and Landauer, T.K. 1999. Automated Essay Scoring: Applications to Educational Technology. EdMedia '99.
12. Hughes, D.C., Keeling B. and Tuck, B.F. 1983. The effects of instructions to scorers intended to reduce context effects in essay scoring, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43:1047-1050.
13. Ishioka, T. and Kameda, M. 1999. Document retrieval based onWords' cooccurrences-the algorithm and its applications (in Japanese), Japanese Journal of Applied Statistics, 28(2):107-121.
14. Jelinek, F. 1991. Up from trigrams! The struggle for improved Language models, the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH-91), 1037-1040.
15. Knuth, D.E., Larrabee, T. and Roberts, P.M. 1988. Mathematical Writing, Stanford University Computer Science Department, Report Number: STANCS-88-1193.
16. Maekawa, M. 1995. Scientific Analysis of Writing (in Japanese), ISBN4-00-007953-0, Iwanami Shotton.
17. Marshall, J.C. and Powers, J.M. 1969. Writing neatness, composition errors and essay grades, Journal of Educational Measurement, 6(2):97-101.
18. Meyer, G. 1939. The choice of questions on essay examinations, Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(3):161-171.
19. Nagao, M.(ed.) 1996. Natural Language Processing (in Japanese), The Iwanami Software Science Series 15, ISBN 4-00-10355-5
20. Noya, S.: 1997. Logical Training (in Japanese), Sangyo Tosho, ISBN 4-7828-0205-6.
21. Page, E.B., Poggio, J.P. and Keith, T.Z. 1997. Computer analysis of student essays: Finding trait differences in the student profile. AERA/NCME Symposium on Grading Essays by Computer.
22. Powers, D.E., Burstein, J.C., Chodorow, M., Fowles, M.E., and Kukich, K. 2000. Comparing the validity of automated and human essay scoring, GRE No. 98-08a. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
23. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Longman.
24. Rudner, L.M. and Liang, L. 2002. National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA. Available online: http://ericae.net/betsy/papers/ n2002e.pdf
25. Tweedie, F.J. and Baayen, R.H. 1998 How Variable May a Constant Be? Measures of Lexical Richness in Perspective, Computers and the Humanities, 32:323-352.
26. Watanabe, H., Taira, Y. and Inoue, T. 1988 An Analysis of Essay Examination Data (in Japanese), Research bulletin, Fuculty of Education, University of Tokyo, 28:143-164.
27. Yule, G.U. 1944. The Statistical Study of Literary Vocabulary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.