Continuous recognition of daily activities from multiple heterogeneous sensors

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-09-04, Issue , 2009, Pages 80-85

  Wu, Tsu Yu ^a   Hsu, Jane Yung Jen ^a   Chiang, Yi Ting ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY MODELS; ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; CONTEXT AWARE SERVICES; DAILY ACTIVITY; DISCRIMINATIVE MODELS; HETEROGENEOUS SENSORS; INTELLIGENT HOME; OVERLAPPING FEATURES; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; RECOGNITION ACCURACY; SEQUENCE LABELING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION SERVICES; LABELING; SENSORS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS;

EID: 70350578936     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Altun, Y.; Tsochantaridis, I.; and Hofmann, T. 2003. Hidden markov support vector machines. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
2. Beal, M. J.; Ghahramani, Z.; and Rasmussen, C. E. 2003. The infinite hidden markov model. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14 577-584.
3. Bilmes, J. 2007. The Graphical Models Toolkit (GMTK). http://ss.li.ee.washington.edu/~bilmes/gmtk/.
4. Chieu, H. L.; Lee, W. S.; and Kaelbling, L. P. 2006. Activity recognition from physiological data using conditional random fields. Technical report, Singapore-MIT Alliance (SMA) Annual Symposium.
5. Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M. I. 1997. Factorial hidden markov models. Machine Learning 29(2-3):245-273.
6. hmm : Sequence Tagging with Structural Support Vector Machines. http://svmlight.Joachims.org/svm-struct.html.
7. Katz, S.; Ford, A.; Moskowitz, R.; Jackson, B.; and Jaffe, M. 1963. Studies of illness in the aged: The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of the American Medical Association 185(12):914-919.
8. Keerthi, S. S., and Sundararajan, S. 2007. CRF versus SVM-struct for sequence labeling. Technical report, Yahoo Research.
9. Kudo, T. 2007. CRF++: Yet Another CRF toolkit, http://erfpp.sourceforge. net/.
10. Lafferty, J.; McCallum, A.; and Pereira, F. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models, for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
11. Lawton, M., and Brody, E. 1969. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9(3): 179-186.
12. Liao, L.; Fox, D.; and Kautz, H. A. 2005. Location-based activity recognition using relational markov networks. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 773-778. Professional Book Center.
13. Liao, L.; Fox, D.; and Kautz, H. A. 2007. Extracting places and activities from GPS traces using hierarchical conditional random fields. International Journal of Robotics Research 26:119-134.
14. Limketkai, B.; Liao, L.; and Fox, D. 2007. CRF-Filters: Discriminative particle filters for sequential state estimation. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).
15. Liu, D. C, and Nocedal, J. 1989. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Mathematical Programming 45:503-528.
16. Mccallum, A.; Freitag, D.; and Pereira, F. 2000. Maximum entropy markov models for information extraction and segmentation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
17. Nguyen, N., and Guo, Y. 2007. Comparisons of sequence labeling algorithms and extensions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
18. Oliver, N.; Garg, A.; and Horvitz, E. 2004. Layered representations for learning and inferring office activity from multiple sensory channels. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 96(2): 163-180.
19. Patterson, D. J.; Liao, L.; Fox, D.; and Kautz, H. A. 2003. Inferring high-level behavior from low-level sensors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (Ubicomp), volume 2864 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 73-89. Springer.
20. Rogers, W.; Meyer, B.; Walker, N.; and Fisk, A. 1998. Functional limitations to daily living tasks in the aged: a focus group analysis. Human Factors 40(1): 111-125.
21. Shimosaka, M.; Mori, T.; and Sato, T. 2007. Robust action recognition and segmentation with multi-task conditional random fields. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).
22. Sminchisescu, C; Kanaujia, A.; and Metaxas, D. 2006. Conditional models for contextual human motion recognition. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 104(2):210-220.
23. Smyth, P.; Heckerman, D.; and Jordan, M. I. 1997. Probabilistic independence networks for hidden markov probability models. Neural Computation 9(2):227-269.
24. Tsochantaridis, I.; Joachims, T.; Hofmann, T.; and Altun, Y 2005. Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) 6:1453-1484.
25. Wilson, D. H., and Atkeson, C. G. 2005. Simultaneous tracking and activity recognition (STAR) using many anonymous, binary sensors. In Gellersen, H.-W.; Want, R.; and Schmidt, A., eds., Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive), volume 3468 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 62-79. Springer.
26. Wu, T.-y.; Lian, C.-c; and Hsu, J. Y.-j. 2007. Joint recognition of multiple concurrent activities using factorial conditional random fields. Technical Report WS-07-09, AAAI Workshop on Plan, Activity, Intent Recognition (PAIR).
27. Yen, C.-n. 2007. Utilizing heterogeneous sensors for everyday activity recognition. Master's thesis, National Taiwan University.