Effect of filler particle size and morphology on force/work parameters for stickiness of unset resin-composites

Dental Materials

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1585-1592

  Kaleem, Muhammad ^a,b   Satterthwaite, Julian D ^a   Watts, David C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Filler morphology; Filler size; Resin composite; Rheology; Stickiness

Indexed keywords

BIS-GMA; COMPRESSIVE FORCES; CONSTANT SPEED; FILLER PARTICLES; FILLER VOLUME FRACTION; INTEGRATED AREAS; MATRIX; MAXIMUM VALUES; MULTI-MODAL; MULTIPLE PAIRS; RESIN-COMPOSITES; SIZE AND SHAPE; STICKINESS; TEMPERATURE INCREASE; TENSILE FORCES; TUKEY POST HOC TEST; UNCURED RESINS; UNIMODAL;

ELASTICITY; FILLERS; MORPHOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; PLASTICITY; PROBES; RESINS; RHEOLOGY; STAINLESS STEEL; VISCOSITY;

SIZE SEPARATION;

BARIUM BOROSILICATE; BARIUM DERIVATIVE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CAMPHOROQUINONE; GLASS; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLOXYPROPYLTRIMETHOXYSILANE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICATE; SILICON DIOXIDE; TERPENE; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANICS; PARTICLE SIZE; TEMPERATURE; TRANSDUCER;

ADHESIVENESS; BARIUM COMPOUNDS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL PHENOMENA; METHACRYLATES; PARTICLE SIZE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYURETHANES; RHEOLOGY; SILANES; SILICATES; SILICON DIOXIDE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TEMPERATURE; TERPENES; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 70350566109     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Köhler B., Rasmusson C.G., and Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 28 (2000) 111-116
2. Knobloch L.A., Kerby R.E., Seghi R., Berlin J.S., and Clelland N. Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials. J Prosthet Dent 88 (2002) 307-313
3. Collins C.J., Bryant R.W., and Hodge K.L.V. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 26 (1998) 311-317
4. Opdam N.J.M., Loomans B.A.C., Roeters F.J.M., and Bronkhorst E.M. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent 32 (2004) 379-383
5. Moszner N., and Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 26 (2001) 535-576
6. Bae J.M., Kim K.N., Hattori M., Hasegawa K., Yoshinari M., Kawada E., et al. Fatigue strengths of particulate filler composites reinforced with fibers. Dent Mater J 23 (2004) 166-174
7. Taylor D.F., Kalachandra S., Sankarapandian M., and McGrath J.E. Relationship between filler and matrix resin characteristics and the properties of uncured composite pastes. Biomaterials 19 (1998) 197-204
8. Silikas N., and Watts D.C. Rheology of urethane dimethacrylate and diluent formulations. Dent Mater 15 (1999) 257-261
9. Tavas M.A., and Watts D.C. The use of a cone and plate viscometer for determination of flow properties of unfilled resins and etching gels. J Oral Rehabil 16 (1989) 185-192
10. Kim S., Jang J., and Kim O. Rheological properties of fumed silica filled Bis-GMA dispersions. Polym Eng Sci 38 (1998) 1142-1148
11. Bayne S.C., Thompson J.Y., Swift Jr. E.J., Stamatiades P., and Wilkerson M.A. Characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc (1998) 129
12. Leinfelder K., and Prasad A. A new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth. Dent Today 17 (1998) 112-116
13. Leinfelder K.F., Radz G.M., and Nash R.W. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compendium Continuing Educ Dent (Jamesburg, N.J.: 1995) (1998) 19
14. Opdam N.J.M., Roeters J.J.M., Peters T.C.R.B., Burgersdijk R.C.W., and Kuijs R.H. Consistency of resin composites for posterior use. Dent Mater 12 (1996) 350-354
15. Ferracane J.L., Moser J.B., and Greener E.H. Rheology of composite restoratives. J Dent Res 60 (1981) 1678-1685
16. Al-Sharaa K.A., and Watts D.C. Stickiness prior to setting of some light cured resin-composites. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 182-187
17. Masouras K., Akhtar R., Watts D.C., and Silikas N. Effect of filler size and shape on local nanoindentation modulus of resin-composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19 (2008) 3561-3566
18. Kim K.-H., Ong J.L., and Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 87 (2002) 642-649
19. Rodrigues Jr. S.A., Scherrer S.S., Ferracane J.L., and Bona A.D. Microstructural characterization and fracture behavior of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite. Dent Mater 24 (2008) 1281-1288
20. Liu Y., Tan Y., Lei T., Xiang Q., Han Y., and Huang B. Effect of porous glass-ceramic fillers on mechanical properties of light-cured dental resin composites. Dent Mater 25 (2009) 709-715
21. Samuel S.P., Li S., Mukherjee I., Guo Y., Patel A.C., Baran G., et al. Mechanical properties of experimental dental composites containing a combination of mesoporous and nonporous spherical silica as fillers. Dent Mater 25 (2009) 296-301
22. Lee J.-H., Um C.-M., and Lee I.-b. Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in monomer and filler composition. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 515-526
23. Chuang H.K., Chiu C., and Paniagua R. Avery adhesive test yields more performance data than traditional probe. Adhesives Age 40 (1997) 18-23
24. Gay C., and Leibler L. Theory of tackiness. Phys Rev Lett 82 (1999) 936-939
25. Yamaguchi T., Morita H., and Doi M. Modeling on debonding dynamics of pressure-sensitive adhesives. Eur Phys J E 20 (2006) 7-17
26. Lee I.-B., Son H.-H., and Um C.-M. Rheologic properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 298-307