Test of English as a Foreign Language™: Internet-based Test (TOEFL iBT®)

Language Testing

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 621-631

  Alderson, J Charles ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350560423     PISSN: 02655322     EISSN: 14770946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0265532209346371     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Alderson, J.C. & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback. Language Testing, 13(3), 280-297.
2. Bejar, I., Douglas, D., Jamieson, J., Nissan, S., & Turner, J. (2000). TOEFL 2000 listening framework: A working paper. TOEFL Monograph Series, MA - 19. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3. Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (Eds) (2008). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York: Routledge.
4. Cohen, A.D. & Upton, T.A. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks. TOEFL Monograph Series, MS - 33. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
5. Ealta (2006). Guidelines for good practice. Available athttp://www.ealta.eu.org/guidelines.htm. Last accessed March 22, 2009.
6. Enright, M.K. & Quinlan, T. (2009). Complementing human judgment of essays written by English language learners with e-rater® scoring. Manuscript submitted for publication, Educational Testing Service.
7. ETS (2007). TOEFL iBT tips. How to prepare for the TOEFL iBT. Available athttp://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/TOEFL_Tips.pdf. Last accessed March 9, 2009.
8. ETS (2008a). 2008-09 TOEFL iBT Bulletin. Information and registration for Internet-based testing (iBT). Available athttp://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/toefl_ibt_bulletin_08_09.pdf.
9. ETS (2008b). Validity evidence supporting the interpretation and use of TOEFL iBT scores. Available athttp://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/TOEFL_iBT_Validity.pdf.
10. ETS (2008c). Reliability and comparability of TOEFL iBT scores. Availableathttp://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/TOEFL/pdf/TOEFL_iBT_Reliability.pdf.
11. Jamieson, J.M., Eignor, D., Grabe, W., & Kunnan, A.J. (2008). Frameworks for a new TOEFL. In Chapelleet al.(Eds), Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language (pp. 55-95). New York: Routledge.
12. Sawaki, Y., Stricker, L.J., & Oranje, A.H. (2009). Factor structure of the TOEFL Internet-based test. Language Testing, 26(1), 5-30.
13. Taylor, C. & Angelis, P. (2008). The evolution of the TOEFL. In Chapelleet al.(Eds), Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language (pp. 27-54). New York: Routledge.
14. Toulmin, S.E. (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Wall, D. & Horák, T. (2006) The impact of changes in the TOEFL examination on teaching and learning in Central and Eastern Europe: Phase 1, The baseline study. TOEFL Monograph Series, MS - 34. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
16. Wall, D. & Horák, T. (2008a). The impact of changes in the TOEFL examination on teaching and learning in Central and Eastern Europe: Phase 2, Coping with change. TOEFL iBT Research Report, TOEFLiBT-05. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
17. Wall, D. & Horák, T. (2008b). The impact of changes in the TOEFL examination on teaching and learning in a sample of countries in Europe: Phase 3, The role of the coursebook. Phase 4, Describing change. Manuscript submitted for publication, Lancaster University.
18. Zhang, Y. (2008). Repeater analyses for TOEFL iBT. Research Memorandum ETS RM-08-05. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.