Application of multiple methods for aeroelastic uncertainty analysis

AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Danowsky, Brian P ^a   Chrstos, Jeffery R ^a   Klyde, David H ^a   Farhat, Charbel ^b   Brenner, Marty ^c  

^a SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY INC   (United States)

^b CMSoft Inc   (United States)

^c NASA DRYDEN FLIGHT RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROELASTIC MODELS; ANALYSIS APPROACH; ANALYTICAL PREDICTIONS; COMPUTATIONAL DEMANDS; COMPUTATIONAL TIME; ESSENTIAL DYNAMICS; FLIGHT TESTING; HIGH FIDELITY; HIGH-FIDELITY SIMULATIONS; INERTIAL FORCES; MONTE CARLO; MULTIPLE METHODS; NONLINEAR AEROELASTIC SIMULATIONS; REDUCED ORDER MODELS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; ROBUST STABILITY TECHNIQUES; STOCHASTIC SIMULATIONS; TRANSONIC REGIME;

AEROELASTICITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); MECHANICS; STOCHASTIC MODELS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 70350526721     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Zimmerman, N., and J. Weissenburger, "Prediction of Flutter Onset Speed Based on Flight Testing at Subcritical Speeds," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 1, No. 4, July-August 1964, pp. 190-202.
2. Yurkovich, R. N., Liu, D. D., and Chen, P. C., The State-of-the-Art of Unsteady Aerodynamics for High Performance Aircraft, AIAA Paper 2001-0428.
3. Geuzaine, P., Brown, G., Harris, C., and Farhat, C., Aeroelastic Dynamic Analysis of a Full F-16 Configuration for Various Flight Conditions, AIAA Journal 41, 2003, pp. 363-371.
4. Farhat, C., Geuzaine, P., and Brown, G., Application of a Three-Field Nonlinear Fluid-Structure Formulation to the Prediction of the Aeroelastic Parameters of an F-16 Fighter, Computers & Fluids 32, 2003, pp. 3-29.
5. Sussingham, C., DeJoannis, J., and Sansone, A., F-16 Aeroelastic Flight Testing: Impact on the Operational Fleet, June 9 2000.
6. Kuttenkeuler, J., A Finite Element Based Modal Method for Determination of Plate Stiffnesses Considering Uncertainties, J. of Composite Materials 33, 1999, pp. 695-711.
7. Kuttenkeuler, J. and Ringertz, U., Aeroelastic Tailoring Considering Uncertainties in Material Properties, Str. Optimization 15, 1998, pp. 157-162.
8. Lieu, T., C. Farhat and M. Lesoinne, Reduced-Order Fluid/Structure Modeling of a Complete Aircraft Configuration, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 195, pp. 5730-5742, 2006.
9. Anon., U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 1976, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, Oct. 1976.
10. th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001.
11. nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2002.
12. Lind, R. and M. J. Brenner, Robust Flutter Margin Analysis That Incorporates Flight Data, NASA/TP-1998-206543, March, 1998, pp. 12-13, 22.
13. Lind, R. and M. Brenner, Robust Aeroservoelastic Stability Analysis, Springer-Verlag London Limited, 1999.
14. Zhou, K., J. C. Doyle, and K. Glover, Robust and Optimal Control, Prentice Hall, NJ, 1996.
15. Zhou, K. and J. C. Doyle, Essentials of Robust Control, Prentice Hall, NJ, 1998.
16. Yates, E. Carson Jr., AGARD Standard Aeroelastic Configurations for Dynamic Response. Candidate Configuration I.-Wing 445.6, NASA-TM-100492, August, 1987.
17. Farhat, C., Parameterized Reduced-Order Structural and Aerodynamic Models of the AGARD Wing 445.6 for Real-time Non-deterministic Aeroelastic Analyses, Report 1, Purchase Order C100027/1379/DHK