Reduced-order fluid/structure modeling of a complete aircraft configuration

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 195, Issue 41-43, 2006, Pages 5730-5742

  Lieu, T ^a   Farhat, C ^a,b   Lesoinne, M ^c  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c University of Colorado   (United States)

Author keywords

Aeroelasticity; F 16; Flutter; POD; ROM

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DAMPING; FLIGHT SIMULATORS; FREQUENCIES; INTERPOLATION; VECTORS;

FLIGHT TEST DATA; FLUTTER; FULL-ORDER NONLINEAR SIMULATIONS; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION (POD) METHOD;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAMPING; FLIGHT SIMULATORS; FREQUENCIES; INTERPOLATION; VECTORS;

EID: 33745335814     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2005.08.026     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albano E., and Rodden W. A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distribution on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flow. AIAA J. 7 (1969) 279-285
2. Ashley H., and Zartarian G. Piston theory-a new aerodynamic tool for the aeroelastician. Journal of Aerospace Sciences 23 (1956) 1109-1118
3. R.N. Yurkovich, D.D. Liu, P.C. Chen, The state-of-the-art of unsteady aerodynamics for high performance aircraft, AIAA Paper 2001-0428.
4. Farhat C., Geuzaine P., and Brown G. Application of a three-field non-linear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter. Comput. Fluids 32 (2003) 3-29
5. Geuzaine P., Brown G., Harris C., and Farhat C. Aeroelastic dynamic analysis of a full F-16 configuration for various flight conditions. AIAA J. 41 (2003) 363-371
6. Farhat C., Geuzaine P., and Brown G. Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter. Computers and Fluids 32 1 (2003) 3-29
7. M. Sadeghi, F. Liu, Investigation of non-linear flutter by a coupled aerodynamics and structural dynamics method, AIAA Paper 2001-0573.
8. Liu F., Cai J., and Zhu Y. Calculation of wing flutter by a coupled fluid-structure method. J. Aircraft 38 2 (2001) 334-342
9. M.C. Romanowski, Reduced order unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic models using Karhunen-Loeve eigenmodes, in: 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 1996, pp. 7-13.
10. K. Willcox, J. Peraire, Balanced model reduction via the proper orthogonal decomposition, AIAA Paper 2001-2611.
11. Epureanu B.I. A parametric analysis of reduced order models of viscous flows in turbomachinery. J. Fluids Struct. 17 (2003) 971-982
12. K.C. Hall, J.P. Thomas, E.H. Dowell, Reduced-order modelling of unsteady small-disturbance flows using a frequency domain proper orthogonal decomposition technique, AIAA Paper 99-16520.
13. Hall K.C., Thomas J.P., and Dowell E.H. Proper orthogonal decomposition technique for transonic unsteady aerodynamic flows. AIAA J. 38 2 (2000) 1853-1862
14. T. Kim, J.E. Bussoletti, An optimal reduced-order aeroelastic modeling based on a response-based modal analysis of unsteady cfd models, AIAA Paper 2001-1525.
15. Thomas J.P., Dowell E.H., and Hall K.C. Three-dimensional transonic aeroelasticity using proper orthogonal decomposition-based reduced order models. J. Aircraft 40 3 (2003) 544-551
16. T. Lieu, M. Lesoinne, Parameter adaptation of reduced order models for three-dimensional flutter analysis, AIAA Paper 2004-0888.
17. Cizmas P.G.A., and Palacios A. Proper orthogonal decomposition of turbine rotor-stator interaction. J. Propulsion Power 19 2 (2003) 268-281
18. J.E. Spitler, Initial studies of low-order turbulence modeling of the wind turbine in-flow environment, AIAA Paper 2004-1004.
19. Karhunen K. Zur spektraltheorie stochastischer prozesse. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. 34 (1946)
20. Loeve M. Functions aléatoire de second ordere. CR Acad. Sci. Paris 220 (1945)
21. P.S. Beran, C.L. Pettit, Prediction of nonlinear panel response using proper orthogonal decomposition, AIAA Paper 2001-1292.
22. T. Lieu, Adaptation of reduced order models for applications in aeroelasticity, Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2004.
23. Farhat C., Lesoinne M., and Maman N. Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 21 (1995) 807-835
24. Farhat C., Lesoinne M., and LeTallec P. Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 157 (1998) 95-114
25. Lesoinne M., and Farhat C. Cfd-based aeroelastic eigensolver for the subsonic, transonic, and supersonic regimes. J. Aircraft 38 4 (2001) 628-635
26. Lesoinne M., Sarkis M., Hetmaniuk U., and Farhat C. A linearized method for the frequency analysis of three-dimensional fluid/structure interaction problems in all flow regimes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 190 (2001) 3121-3146
27. Lumley J.L. The structure of inhomogeneous turbulence. In: Yaglom A., and Tatarski V. (Eds). Atmospheric Turbulence and Wave Propagations (1967), Nauka, Moscow 166-178
28. Holmes P., Lumley J.L., and Berkooz G. Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry (1996), Cambridge University Press
29. P. Beran, Reduced-order modeling: new approaches for computational physics, AIAA Paper 2001-0853.
30. J. Taylor, Dynamics of large scale structures in turbulent shear layers, Ph.D. thesis, Clarkson University, 2001.
31. J. Taylor, M. Glauser, Towards practical flow sensing and control via pod and LSE based low-dimensional tools, in: 2002 ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, 2002, pp. 1-9.
32. R. Schmidt, M. Glauser, Improvements in low dimensional tools for flow-structure interaction problems: using global pod, AIAA Paper 2004-0889.
33. Björck Å., and Golub G.H. Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces. Math. Comput. 27 123 (1973) 579-594