What do public values mean for Public action?: Putting public values in their plural place

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 602-618

  Davis, Paul ^a   West, Karen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Modeling; Plurality; Public values; Value framing regime; Values conflict

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350521538     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074008328499     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Accenture/National Trust. (2006). Demonstrating the public value of heritage. London: Accenture/ National Trust.
2. Balfour, D., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organisational commitment: A reconceptualization and empirical test of public-private differences. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 10, 23-40.
3. Bana e Costa, C.A. (2001). The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: Case study. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10, 111-125.
4. Baron, J., & Leschner, S. (2000). How serious are expressions of protected values? Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 1100-1118.
5. Beck Jørgensen, T. (2007). Public values, their nature, stability and change. The case of Denmark. Public Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 365-398.
6. Beck Jørgenson, T., & Bozeman, B. (2002). Public values lost? Comparing cases of contracting out from Denmark and the United States. Public Management Review, 4, 63-81.
7. Beck Jørgenson, T., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration and Society, 39, 354-381.
8. Ben Ahmed, W., & Yannou, B. (2003). Polysemy of values or conflict of interests: A multi-disciplinary analysis. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 16, 153-179.
9. Berg, A. (2001). The concept of value in public sector reform discourse. Concepts and Transformation, 6(1), 39-56.
10. Blaug, R., Horner L., & Lekhi, R. (2006). Public value, politics and public management: A literature review. London: The Work Foundation.
11. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Bozeman, B. (1987). All organizations are public. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Bozeman, B. (2002). Public-value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62, 145-161.
14. Bozeman, B., & Sarewitz, D. (2005). Public values and public values failure in U.S. science policy. Research Evaluation, 32(2), 119-229.
15. British Telecommunications plc. (2003). Just values: Beyond the business case for sustainable development. London: Author.
16. Brodtrick, O. (1999). Risk, innovation and values: Examining the tensions. Final report prepared for Risk Management Division, Comptrollership Branch, Treasury Board of Canada. Ottawa: Centre for Public Management.
17. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment. (n.d.). Healthy hospitals: Radical improvements in hospital design. London: Author.
18. DeCarufel, A. (1994). Organizational culture change for public sector managers. Optimum, 25(2), 16-24.
19. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-666.
20. Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology-The issue attention cycle. The Public Interest, 28, 38-50.
21. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management is dead-Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494.
22. English Heritage. (Eds.). (2006). Capturing the public value of heritage: The Proceedings of the London Conference, 25-26th January. Swindon, UK: Author.
23. Feeney, M. (2008). Public wars and private armies: Militaries, mercenaries, and public values. International Public Value Workshop, University of Copenhagen.
24. Grankvist, G., Lekedal, H., & Marmendal, M. (2007). Values and eco- and fair-trade labelled products. British Food Journal, 109(2), 169-181.
25. Haque, M.S. (2001). The diminishing publicness of public service under the current mode of governance. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 65-82.
26. Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J.A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-393.
27. Huzzard, T., & Östergren, K. (2002). When norms collide: Learning under organizational hypocrisy. British Journal of Management, 13, S47-S59.
28. Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value: An analytical framework for public service reform. London: Strategy Unit, UK Cabinet Office.
29. Kernaghan, K. (1994). The emerging public service culture: Values, ethics, and reforms. Canadian Public Administration, 37(4), 614-630.
30. Kernaghan, K. (2003). Integrating values into public service: The values statement as centerpiece. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 711-719.
31. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor network theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
33. Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of "muddling through." Public Administration Review, 19, 78-88.
34. Moore, M.H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Mower, M. (2001). Reputation assurance: The new challenge for local government. Management Services, 45(1), 16.
36. O'Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353-366.
37. Pollitt, C. (2000). Institutional amnesia: A paradox of the "information age"? Prometheus, 18(1), 5-16.
38. Provan, K., & Milward, B. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 1-33.
39. Rhodes, R.A.W., & Wanna, J. (2007). The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the platonic guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66, 406-421.
40. Rogers, J.D., & Kingsley, G. (2004). Denying public value: The role of the public sector in accounts of the development of the Internet. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 371-393.
41. Schall, E. (1997). Public sector succession: A strategic approach to sustaining innovation. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 4-10.
42. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Row, Peterson.
43. Simon, H.A. (1957). Administrative behaviour (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
44. Steenhausen, B., & van Eeton, M. (2008). Invisible trade-offs of public values: Inside Dutch railways. Public Money and Management, 28(3), 147-152.
45. Stewart, J. (1984). The role of information in public accountability. In A. Hopwood & C. Tomkins (Eds.), Issues in public sector accounting (pp. 13-15). Oxford, UK: Phillip Alan.
46. Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? American Review of Public Administration, 36, 41-57.
47. Stone, D. (2006). Reframing the racial disparities issue for state governments. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 31(1), 128-152.
48. Van Vuuren, M., Veldkamp, B.P., de Jong, M.D.T., & Seydel, E.R. (2008). Why work? Aligning foci and dimensions of commitment along the axes of the competing values framework. Personnel Review, 37(1), 47-65.
49. Vickers, R. (1973). Values, norms and policies. Policy Sciences, 4(1), 103-111.
50. Warren, M.E. (2002). Deliberative democracy. In A. Carter & G. Stokes (Eds.), Democratic theory today. Bristol, UK: Polity Press.
51. West, K., Scanlon, K., Thornley, A., & Rydin, Y. (2003). The Greater London Authority: Problems of strategy integration. Policy and Politics, 31(4), 479-496.