Individual differences on schedule-induced polydipsia: Differential effects of prefrontal cortex amphetamine infusion;Los efectos de la anfetamina administrada en el córtex prefrontal medial sobre las diferencias individuales en polidipsia inducida por programa

International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 261-272

  Grancha, Matilde López ^a   Crespo, Ginesa López ^b   Amate, María del Carmen Sánchez ^b   Cubos, Pilar Flores ^b  

^a CNS Research Department Bagneux   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Individual differences; Medial prefrontal cortex; Schedule induced polydipsia

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350520520     PISSN: 15777057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Altemus M, Glowa JR, Galliven E, Leong Y y Murphy DL (1996). Effects of serotonergic agents on food-restriction-induced hyperactivity. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 53, 123-131.
2. Aggleton JP, Neave N, Nagle S y Sahgal A (1995). A comparison of the effects of medial prefrontal, cingulate cortex, and cingulum bundle lesions on tests of spatial memory: Evidence of a double dissociation between frontal and cingulum bundle contributions. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 7270-7281.
3. Balleine BW y Dickinson A (1998). Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates. Neuropharmacology, 37, 407-419.
4. de Bruin J.P, Sánchez Santed F, Heinsbroek RP, Donker A y Postmes P (1994). A behavioural analysis of rats with damage to the medial prefrontal cortex using the Morris water maze: evidence for behavioural flexibility, but not for impaired spatial navigation. Brain Research, 652, 323-333.
5. Cardinal RN, Winstanley CA, Robbins TW y Everitt BJ (2004). Limbic corticostriatal systems and delayed reinforcement. Annual NY Academy of Science, 1021, 33-50.
6. Dantzer R, Terlouw C, Tazi A, Koolhaas JM, Bohus B, Koob GF y LeMoal M (1988). The propensity for schedule-induced polydipsia is related to differences in conditioned avoidance behavior in defense reactions in a defeat test. Physiology and Behavior, 43, 269-273.
7. De Carolis NA, Myracle A, Erbach J, Glowa J, Flores P y Riley AL (2003). Strain-dependent differences in schedule-induced polydipsia: An assessment in Lewis and Fischer rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 74, 755-763.
8. Dias R, Robbins TW y Roberts AC (1996). Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts. Nature, 380, 69-72.
9. Falk JL (1961). Production of polydipsia in normal rats by an intermitent food schedule. Science, 133, 195-196.
10. Falk JL (1971). The nature and determinants of adjunctive behavior. Physiology and Behavior, 6, 677-588.
11. Flores P y Pellón R (1995). Rate-dependency hypothesis and the rate-decreasing effects of damphetamine on schedule-induced drinking. Behavioural Pharmacology, 6, 16-23.
12. Flores P y Pellón R (1997). Effects of d-amphetamine on temporal distributions of schedule-induced polydipsia. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 57, 81-87.
13. Granon S, Passetti F, Thomas KL, Dalley JW, Everitt BJ y Robbins TW (2000). Enhanced and impaired attentional performance after infusion of D1 dopaminergic receptor agents into rat prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1208-1215.
14. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Juncos JL, Neil DB y Justice JB (1994). Individual differences in scheduleinduced and conditioned behaviors. Behavior & Brain Research, 60, 199-209.
15. Killeen PR, Hanson SJ y Osborne SR (1978). Arousal: Its genesis and manifestation as response rate. Psychological Review, 85, 571-581.
16. Koehl M, Lemaire V, Mayo W, Abrous DN, Maccari S, Piazza PV, Le-Moal M y Vallee M (2002). Individual vulnerability to substance abuse and affective disorders: role of early environmental influences. Neurotoxicology Research, 4, 281-96.
17. Kolb B (1984). Functions of the frontal cortex of the rat: a comparative review. Brain Research, 320, 65-98.
18. Koob GF, Riley SJ, Smith SC y Robbins TW (1978). Effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and olfactory tubercle on feeding, locomotor activity, and amphetamine anorexia in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 92, 917-927.
19. López Grancha M (2005). Mecanismos neuroconductuales de las diferencias individuales en la polidipsia inducida por programa. Tesis Doctoral, Departamento de Neurociencia y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Almería.
20. López Grancha M, López Crespo G, Venero C, Cañadas F, Sánchez Santed F, Sand, C y Flores P (2006). Differences in corticosterone level due to inter-food interval lenght: Implications for schedule-induced polydipsia. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 166-172.
21. Mittleman G, Castaneda E, Robinson TE y Valenstein ES (1986). The Propensity for nonregulatory ingestive behavior is related to differences in dopamine systems: behavioural and biochemical evidence. Behavioral Neuroscience, 100, 213-220.
22. Mittleman G, Van Brunt CL y Matthews DB (2003). Schedule-induced ethanol self-administration in DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice. Alcoholism Clinical & Experimental Research, 27, 1-8.
23. Mittleman G y Valenstein ES (1985). Individual differences in non-regulatory ingestive behavior and catecholamine systems. Brain Research, 348, 112-117.
24. Mittleman G, Whishaw IQ, Jones GH, Koch M y Robbins TW (1990). Cortical, hippocampal and striatal mediation of schedule-induced behaviors. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 399-409.
25. Myracle A, López Grancha M, Flores P, Glowa J y Riley, AL (2005). Differential effects of morphine and LICL on schedule-induced polydipsia. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 80, 195-202.
26. Pellón R y Blackman DE (1992). Effects of drugs on the temporal distribution of schedule-induced polydipsia in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 43, 689-696.
27. Piazza PV, Mittleman G, Deminiere JM, LeMoal M y Simon H (1993). Relationship between schedule-induced polydipsia and amphetamine intravenous self-administration. Individual differences and role of experience. Behavior & Brain Research, 55,185-193.
28. Robbins TW (2005). Chemistry of the mind: neurochemical modulation of prefrontal cortical function. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493, 140-146.
29. Robbins TW y Koob GF (1980). Selective disruption of displacement behavior by lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Nature, 285, 409-412.
30. Robbins TW, Roberts DCS y Koob GF (1983). Effects of d-amphetamine and apomorphine upon operant behavior and schedule-induced licking in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 224, 662-673.
31. Sanger DJ (1978). The effects of d-amphetamine and scopolamine on drinking induced by a multiple schedule. Psychopharmacology, 58, 311-315.
32. Stöhr T, Szuran T, Welzl H, Pliska V, Feldon J y Pryce CR (2000). Lewis/Fischer rat strain in endocrine and behavioural responses to environmental challenge. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 67, 809-819.
33. Wayner MJ (2002). Craving for alcohol in the rat: adjunctive behavior and the lateral hypothalamus. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 73, 27-43.
34. Williams AM y White JM (1984). The effects of amphetamine and scopolamine on adjunctive drinking and wheelrunning in rats. Psychopharmacology, 82, 360-367.