The influence of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress

International Angiology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 325-333

  Georgakarakos, E ^a   Ioannou, C V ^a   Volanis, S ^b   Papaharilaou, Y ^b   Ekaterinaris, J ^c   Katsamouris, A N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^b INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Aortic aneurysm, abdominal; Aortic aneurysm, abdominal, complications; Thrombosis, complications

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AORTA WALL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; STUDENT T TEST; THROMBUS; WALL STRESS; ABDOMINAL AORTA; AORTOGRAPHY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; HEMODYNAMICS; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL; THROMBOSIS;

AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; STRESS, MECHANICAL; THROMBOSIS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70350519054     PISSN: 03929590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Kennedy FE. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:724-731
2. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech 2000;33:475-482
3. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA, Federle MP, Makaroun MS, Webster MW. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:760-769
4. Hua J. Simple geometric characteristics fail to reliably predict aortic aneurysm wall stresses. J Vasc Surg 2001;34:308-315 (Pubitemid 33661129)
5. Fillinger MF, Racusin J, Baker RK, Cronenwett JL, Teutelink A, Schermerhorn ML et al. Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: Implications for rupture risk. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:1243-1252 (Pubitemid 38952593)
6. Mower WR, Qyinones WJ, Gambir SS. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:602-608
7. Wang DHJ, Makaroun MS, Webster MW, Vorp DA. Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:598-604.
8. Pappu S, Dardik A, Tagare H, Gusberg RJ. Beyond fusiform and saccular: a novel quantitative tortuosity index may help classify aneurysm shape and predict aneurysm rupture potential. Ann Vasc Surg 2008;22:88-97.
9. Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Ballard DJ, Jordan WD, Blebea J et al. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA 2002;287:2968-2972 (Pubitemid 34620000)
10. Giordana S, Sherwin SJ, Peiro J, Doorly DJ, Papaharilaou Y, Caro CG et al. Automated classification of peripheral distal bypass geometries reconstructed from medical data. J Biomech 2005;38:47-62.
11. Di Martino E, Mantero S, Inzoli F, Melissano G, Astore D, Chiesa R. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the presence of endoluminal thrombus on: experimental characterization and structural static computational analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 1998;15:290-299 (Pubitemid 28205986)
12. Fillinger MF, Raghavan ML, Marra SP, Cronenwett JL, Kennedy FE. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:589-597
13. Venkatasubramaniam AK, Mehta T, Fagan MJ, Mylankal KJ, Kuhan G, Ray B. A comperative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004;28:128-176 (Pubitemid 38967271)
14. Truijers M, Pol JA, SchultzeKool LJ, van Sterkenburg SM, Fillinger MF, Blankensteijn JD. Wall stress analysis in small asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33:401-407 (Pubitemid 46336587)
15. Steinman DA, Vorp DA, Ethier CR. Computational modeling of arterial biomechanics: insights into pathogenesis and treatment of vascular disease. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:1118-1128
16. Vorp DA. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech 2007;40:1806-1812
17. Di Martino E, Vorp DA. Effect of variation in intraluminal thrombus constitutive properties on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:804-809
18. Zhi-Yong L, U-King-Im J, Tang TY, Soh E, Choon See T, Gillard JH. Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:928-935
19. Doyle BJ, Callanan A, McGloughlin TM. A comparison of modeling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomed EngOnline 2007;6:38.
20. Vande Geest JP, Di Martino ES, Bohra A, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA. A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment. Ann NY Acad Sci 2006;1085:11-21.
21. Raghavan ML, Webster MW, Vorp DA. Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: assessment using a new mathematical model. Ann Biomech Eng 1996;24:573-582 (Pubitemid 26304921)
22. Li Z, Kleinstreuer C. Effects of blood flow and vessel geometry on wall stress and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Med Eng Tech 2006;30:283-297 (Pubitemid 44410455)
23. Giannoglou G, Giannakoulas G, Soulis J, Chatzizisis Y, Perdikides T, Melas N et al. Predicting the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms by utilizing various geometrical parameters: revisiting the diameter criterion. Angiology 2006;57:487-494 (Pubitemid 44449048)
24. Kazi M, Thyberg J, Religa P, Roy J, Eriksson P, Hedin U et al. Influence of intraluminal thrombus on structural and cellular composition of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J Vasc Surg 2003;38:1283-1292 (Pubitemid 37517657)
25. Leung JH, Wright AR, Cheshire N, Crane J, Thom SA, Hughes AD et al. Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models. Biomeb Eng Online 2006;5:33. (Pubitemid 44027495)
26. Mower WR, Baraff LJ, Sneyd J. Stress distribution in vascular aneurysms: factors affecting risk of aneurysm rupture. J Surg Res 1993;55:155-161 (Pubitemid 23335791)
27. Scotti CM, Shkolnik AD, Muluk SC, Finol EA. Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effect of asymmetry and wall thickness. Biomed Eng Online 2005;4:64.
28. Di Martino E, Bohra A, VandeGeest JP, Gupta N, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:570-576 (Pubitemid 43332745)
29. Raghavan ML, Kratzberg J, de Tolosa EMC, Hanaoka MM, Walker P, da Silva ES. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 2006;39:3010-3016 (Pubitemid 44792106)
30. Wang DHJ, Makaroun MS, Webster MW, Vorp DA. Mechanical properties and microstructure of intraluminal thrombus from abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng 2001;123:536-539
31. van Dam EA, Dams SD, Peters GW, Rutten MC, Schurink GW, Buth J et al. Non-linear viscoelastic behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm thrombus. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2008;7:127-137
32. de Putter S, Wolters BJ, Rutten MC, Breeuwer M, Gerritsen FA, van de Vosse FN. Patient-specific initial wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms with a backward incremental method. J Biomech 2007;40:1081-1090
33. Lu J, Zhou X, Raghavan ML. Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: Demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 2007;40:693-696 (Pubitemid 46107440)
34. Speelman L, Bohra A, Bosboom EM, Schurink GW, van de Voose FN, Makaroun MS et al. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomed Eng 2007;129:105-109 (Pubitemid 46712841)